Suppr超能文献

评估医学生在整个课程中关于共同决策的知识和态度:一项国际在线调查及利益相关者分析方案

Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis.

作者信息

Durand Marie-Anne, Yen Renata, Barr Paul J, Cochran Nan, Aarts Johanna, Légaré France, Reed Malcolm, James O'Malley A, Scalia Peter, Painchaud Guérard Geneviève, Elwyn Glyn

机构信息

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e015945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015945.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shared decision making (SDM) is a goal of modern medicine; however, it is not currently embedded in routine care. Barriers include clinicians’ attitudes, lack of knowledge and training and time constraints. Our goal is to support the development and delivery of a robust SDM curriculum in medical education. Our objective is to assess undergraduate medical students’ knowledge of and attitudes towards SDM in four countries.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The first phase of the study involves a web-based cross-sectional survey of undergraduate medical students from all years in selected schools across the United States (US), Canada and undergraduate and graduate students in the Netherlands. In the United Kingdom (UK), the survey will be circulated to all medical schools through the UK Medical School Council. We will sample students equally in all years of training and assess attitudes towards SDM, knowledge of SDM and participation in related training. Medical students of ages 18 years and older in the four countries will be eligible. The second phase of the study will involve semistructured interviews with a subset of students from phase 1 and a convenience sample of medical school curriculum experts or stakeholders. Data will be analysed using multivariable analysis in phase 1 and thematic content analysis in phase 2. Method, data source and investigator triangulation will be performed. Online survey data will be reported according to the Checklist for Reporting the Results of Internet E-Surveys. We will use the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research for all qualitative data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved for dissemination in the US, the Netherlands, Canada and the UK. The study is voluntary with an informed consent process. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will help inform the inclusion of SDM-specific curriculum in medical education worldwide.

摘要

引言

共同决策(SDM)是现代医学的一个目标;然而,它目前尚未融入常规医疗中。障碍包括临床医生的态度、知识和培训的缺乏以及时间限制。我们的目标是支持在医学教育中开发和提供一个完善的SDM课程。我们的目的是评估四个国家本科医学生对SDM的知识和态度。

方法与分析

研究的第一阶段包括对美国、加拿大选定学校各年级的本科医学生以及荷兰的本科和研究生进行基于网络的横断面调查。在英国,该调查将通过英国医学院理事会分发给所有医学院校。我们将在所有培训年份中对学生进行均等抽样,并评估对SDM的态度、SDM知识以及参与相关培训的情况。四个国家年龄在18岁及以上的医学生将符合条件。研究的第二阶段将包括对第一阶段的部分学生进行半结构化访谈,以及对医学院课程专家或利益相关者进行便利抽样访谈。第一阶段将使用多变量分析,第二阶段将使用主题内容分析来分析数据。将进行方法、数据来源和研究者的三角互证。在线调查数据将根据互联网电子调查结果报告清单进行报告。我们将对所有定性数据使用定性研究报告的统一标准。

伦理与传播

该研究已获批准在美国、荷兰、加拿大和英国进行传播。该研究为自愿参与,有知情同意程序。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并将有助于为全球医学教育中纳入特定的SDM课程提供信息。

相似文献

9
Structured reflection on shared decision making.结构化反思共享决策
Clin Teach. 2021 Feb;18(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/tct.13233. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The use of triangulation in qualitative research.三角互证法在定性研究中的应用。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
4
Twelve myths about shared decision making.关于共同决策的十二个误区。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验