文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

伴有精神分裂症的急性住院患者中共同决策的障碍和促进因素:一项随机对照试验干预组的定性研究结果。

Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia-Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised-controlled trial.

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Isar-Amper-Klinikum München Nord, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1737-1746. doi: 10.1111/hex.13313. Epub 2021 Jul 13.


DOI:10.1111/hex.13313
PMID:34258833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8483208/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The analysis is based on interviews with participants (patients and staff members) of the intervention group of the randomised-controlled SDM trial that demonstrated a significant improvement of SDM measures for patients with schizophrenia on acute psychiatric wards. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Interviews addressed treatment decisions made during the current inpatient stay. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 interviews were analysed and 131 treatment decisions were identified. According to the interviewees, SDM had taken place in 29% of the decisions, whereas 59% of the decisions were made without SDM. In 16%, a clear judgement could not be made. Barriers and facilitators of SDM were categorised into patient factors, clinician factors, setting factors and others. Clinicians mostly reported patient factors (e.g., symptoms) as barriers towards SDM, which were not mirrored on the patients' side. Facilitators included patient as well as clinician behaviour during consultations. CONCLUSION: Even in the context of a successful SDM intervention, the implementation of SDM for patients in the very acute stages of schizophrenia is often not possible. However, strong facilitators for SDM have also been identified, which should be used for further implementation of SDM. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: During the development of the study protocol, meetings with user representatives were held.

摘要

背景:共享决策(SDM)被认为是临床医生和患者之间沟通的一种有前途的模式。然而,在急性心理健康环境中,其实施仍不尽人意。

目的:本研究旨在探讨精神分裂症急性住院患者实施 SDM 的障碍和促进因素。

设计:进行了定性访谈研究。

设置和参与者:该分析基于随机对照 SDM 试验干预组参与者(患者和工作人员)的访谈,该试验表明,急性精神病病房的精神分裂症患者的 SDM 措施有显著改善。

主要研究变量:访谈涉及当前住院期间做出的治疗决策。使用定性内容分析对访谈进行分析。

结果:共分析了 40 次访谈,确定了 131 次治疗决策。根据受访者的说法,在 29%的决策中进行了 SDM,而 59%的决策没有进行 SDM。在 16%的决策中,无法做出明确的判断。SDM 的障碍和促进因素分为患者因素、临床医生因素、环境因素和其他因素。临床医生主要报告患者因素(例如症状)是 SDM 的障碍,但患者方面没有反映出来。促进因素包括患者和临床医生在咨询期间的行为。

结论:即使在成功的 SDM 干预背景下,精神分裂症患者在非常急性阶段实施 SDM 也往往是不可能的。然而,已经确定了强大的 SDM 促进因素,应将其用于进一步实施 SDM。

患者或公众的贡献:在研究方案的制定过程中,与用户代表举行了会议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c071/8483208/68a816751300/HEX-24-1737-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c071/8483208/e76178db3d89/HEX-24-1737-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c071/8483208/99216edfecf0/HEX-24-1737-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c071/8483208/68a816751300/HEX-24-1737-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c071/8483208/e76178db3d89/HEX-24-1737-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c071/8483208/99216edfecf0/HEX-24-1737-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c071/8483208/68a816751300/HEX-24-1737-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia-Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised-controlled trial.

Health Expect. 2021-10

[2]
Shared decision making PLUS - a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).

BMC Psychiatry. 2017-2-23

[3]
Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020-6-16

[4]
Evidence-based Shared-Decision-Making Assistant (SDM-assistant) for choosing antipsychotics: protocol of a cluster-randomized trial in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia.

BMC Psychiatry. 2022-6-17

[5]
Barriers and facilitators for shared decision-making in oncology inpatient practice: an explorative study of the healthcare providers' perspective.

Support Care Cancer. 2022-5

[6]
Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial.

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017-2

[7]
Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation.

BMJ Open. 2022-5-30

[8]
"We will be the ones bearing the consequences": A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospital-based maternity care.

Birth. 2024-9

[9]
Shared decision making, aggression, and coercion in inpatients with schizophrenia.

Eur Psychiatry. 2020-9-28

[10]
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019-9-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living with Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review.

Schizophr Bull. 2025-7-7

[2]
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living With Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review (Part 2-Designing SDM Interventions: Optimizing Design and Local Implementation).

Schizophr Bull. 2025-7-7

[3]
Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-2-21

[4]
Path Analysis of Health Literacy, Social Support, and Self-Efficacy on Decisional Conflict in Patients with Stable Schizophrenia.

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024-12-20

[5]
A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-9-27

[6]
How can we improve the care of patients with schizophrenia in the real-world? A population-based cohort study of 456,003 patients.

Mol Psychiatry. 2023-12

[7]
Evidence-based Shared-Decision-Making Assistant (SDM-assistant) for choosing antipsychotics: protocol of a cluster-randomized trial in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia.

BMC Psychiatry. 2022-6-17

[8]
Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation.

BMJ Open. 2022-5-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Shared decision-making and the nuances of clinical work: Concepts, barriers and opportunities for a dynamic model.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2021-8

[2]
Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020-6-16

[3]
Different forms of informal coercion in psychiatry: a qualitative study.

BMC Res Notes. 2019-12-2

[4]
Giving Patients Choices During Involuntary Admission: A New Intervention.

Front Psychiatry. 2019-7-4

[5]
Shared decision-making with involuntary hospital patients: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.

BJPsych Open. 2018-4-17

[6]
Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - a scoping review.

Implement Sci. 2018-3-9

[7]
Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis.

BMJ Open. 2017-6-23

[8]
Common sense alone is not enough.

World Psychiatry. 2017-6

[9]
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.

World Psychiatry. 2017-6

[10]
Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial.

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索