Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Isar-Amper-Klinikum München Nord, Munich, Germany.
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1737-1746. doi: 10.1111/hex.13313. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The analysis is based on interviews with participants (patients and staff members) of the intervention group of the randomised-controlled SDM trial that demonstrated a significant improvement of SDM measures for patients with schizophrenia on acute psychiatric wards. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Interviews addressed treatment decisions made during the current inpatient stay. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 interviews were analysed and 131 treatment decisions were identified. According to the interviewees, SDM had taken place in 29% of the decisions, whereas 59% of the decisions were made without SDM. In 16%, a clear judgement could not be made. Barriers and facilitators of SDM were categorised into patient factors, clinician factors, setting factors and others. Clinicians mostly reported patient factors (e.g., symptoms) as barriers towards SDM, which were not mirrored on the patients' side. Facilitators included patient as well as clinician behaviour during consultations. CONCLUSION: Even in the context of a successful SDM intervention, the implementation of SDM for patients in the very acute stages of schizophrenia is often not possible. However, strong facilitators for SDM have also been identified, which should be used for further implementation of SDM. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: During the development of the study protocol, meetings with user representatives were held.
背景:共享决策(SDM)被认为是临床医生和患者之间沟通的一种有前途的模式。然而,在急性心理健康环境中,其实施仍不尽人意。
目的:本研究旨在探讨精神分裂症急性住院患者实施 SDM 的障碍和促进因素。
设计:进行了定性访谈研究。
设置和参与者:该分析基于随机对照 SDM 试验干预组参与者(患者和工作人员)的访谈,该试验表明,急性精神病病房的精神分裂症患者的 SDM 措施有显著改善。
主要研究变量:访谈涉及当前住院期间做出的治疗决策。使用定性内容分析对访谈进行分析。
结果:共分析了 40 次访谈,确定了 131 次治疗决策。根据受访者的说法,在 29%的决策中进行了 SDM,而 59%的决策没有进行 SDM。在 16%的决策中,无法做出明确的判断。SDM 的障碍和促进因素分为患者因素、临床医生因素、环境因素和其他因素。临床医生主要报告患者因素(例如症状)是 SDM 的障碍,但患者方面没有反映出来。促进因素包括患者和临床医生在咨询期间的行为。
结论:即使在成功的 SDM 干预背景下,精神分裂症患者在非常急性阶段实施 SDM 也往往是不可能的。然而,已经确定了强大的 SDM 促进因素,应将其用于进一步实施 SDM。
患者或公众的贡献:在研究方案的制定过程中,与用户代表举行了会议。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017-2
Eur Psychiatry. 2020-9-28
J Med Internet Res. 2025-2-21
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024-12-20
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-9-27
BMC Res Notes. 2019-12-2
Front Psychiatry. 2019-7-4
World Psychiatry. 2017-6
World Psychiatry. 2017-6
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017-2