Suppr超能文献

三种不同玻璃体腔内治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿方式的比较。

A comparison of three different intravitreal treatment modalities of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

作者信息

Kaldırım Havva Erdogan, Yazgan Serpil

机构信息

Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Bulent Ecevit University, Medical Faculty, Department of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1549-1558. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0618-z. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, dexamethasone implant and aflibercept for the management of macular edema (ME) related to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

This retrospective and comparative study included 62 eyes of 62 patients with BRVO and ME. Patients received one of the following treatments: 0.5 mg ranibizumab (group 1, n = 22), 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant (group 2, n = 20) and 2 mg aflibercept (group 3, n = 20). The 6-month treatment protocol in groups 1 and 3 consisted of 3-dose loading treatment for the first 3 months and followed by repeat injections based on clinical necessity. Group 2 received only single dose of 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant for 6 months. Visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), serous retinal detachment (SRD) height and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were done at baseline and first 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline, the groups did not differ in age, gender, duration of ME, VA, CMT, IOP and SRD height (p > 0.05). Mean number of injections per eye within six months were 3.64 ± 0.49 (range 3-4) in group 1, only 1 in group 2 and 3.35 ± 0.49 (range 3-4) in group 3.VA was significantly better in group 2 in first 3 months but it became the worst among three groups in sixth month. CMT did not differ between groups in first 3 months, but it was significantly higher in group 2 at sixth month. SRD height was significantly lower in group 2 in first 3 months, but there was no difference between the groups at the end of the sixth month. IOP was significantly higher in group 2 in third and sixth months.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of ME associated with BRVO, dexamethasone implant appears to be more advantageous in terms of VA and SRD height for the first 3 months. However, at the end of the sixth month of treatment, anti-VEGF drugs were more efficient in maintaining the increased visual acuity and reduced CMT. A dexamethasone implant may be the first treatment option in BRVO cases with high SRD.

摘要

目的

比较玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗、地塞米松植入剂和阿柏西普治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)相关黄斑水肿(ME)的疗效。

方法

这项回顾性比较研究纳入了62例患有BRVO和ME的患者的62只眼。患者接受以下治疗之一:0.5毫克雷珠单抗(第1组,n = 22)、0.7毫克地塞米松植入剂(第2组,n = 20)和2毫克阿柏西普(第3组,n = 20)。第1组和第3组的6个月治疗方案包括前3个月的3剂负荷治疗,然后根据临床需要重复注射。第2组仅接受单剂量0.7毫克地塞米松植入剂治疗6个月。在基线和随访的前6个月测量视力(VA)、中心黄斑厚度(CMT)、浆液性视网膜脱离(SRD)高度和眼压(IOP)。

结果

在基线时,三组在年龄、性别、ME持续时间、VA、CMT、IOP和SRD高度方面无差异(p>0.05)。第1组每只眼在6个月内的平均注射次数为3.64±0.49(范围3 - 4),第2组仅为1次,第3组为3.35±0.49(范围3 - 4)。第2组在最初3个月的VA明显更好,但在第6个月时成为三组中最差的。在最初3个月,各组之间的CMT无差异,但在第6个月时第2组显著更高。第2组在最初3个月的SRD高度明显更低,但在第6个月末各组之间没有差异。第2组在第3个月和第6个月的IOP显著更高。

结论

在治疗与BRVO相关的ME时,地塞米松植入剂在最初3个月在VA和SRD高度方面似乎更具优势。然而,在治疗的第6个月末,抗VEGF药物在维持视力提高和CMT降低方面更有效。地塞米松植入剂可能是SRD较高的BRVO病例的首选治疗方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验