• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心、双盲、随机对照试验:doktormitSDM 培训模块在支持共同决策方面的疗效。

Efficacy of the doktormitSDM training module in supporting shared decision making - Results from a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; MSH Medical School Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Medical Psychology and Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Institute of Medical Psychology and Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Neuroimmunology and Clinical MS Research (INiMS), University of Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2331-2338. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.022
PMID:28647064
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Training to improve physicians' shared decision making (SDM) competencies with proven effectiveness and efficiency is rare. This study evaluated the brief in situ training module 'doktormitSDM'.

METHODS

In a multicenter RCT, each physician recorded four consultations, each of which included a diagnostic or treatment decision (N=152 consultations from seven medical specialties). The doktormitSDM training module included two video-based individual coaching sessions (15min) at the physicians' workplaces, supplemented by a manual and a video tutorial. Primary endpoint was the compound measure SDMmass (based on the MAPPIN'SDM system) which incorporates patient and observer perceptions of involvement and doctor-patient concordance on perceived involvement.

RESULTS

SDMmass increased significantly in the intervention group compared to the controls (effect size 0.58; p=0.05; t-test). This effect tended to persist at follow-up (effect size 0.63; p=0.06). Patients' perceived involvement increased accordingly (effect sizes 0.9/.58; p=0.01/.07).

CONCLUSION

The doktormitSDM training module is effective and efficient at improving SDM competencies. This is the first SDM training to be evaluated with a compound measure simultaneously considering doctor, patient and observer ratings.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Owing to its very brief form and its reference to the doctors' own consultation videos, the doktormitSDM training module meets clinicians' needs and time constraints.

摘要

目的

提高医生共享决策(SDM)能力的培训很少具有经过证实的有效性和效率。本研究评估了简短的现场培训模块“doktormitSDM”。

方法

在一项多中心 RCT 中,每位医生记录了四个咨询,每个咨询都包含诊断或治疗决策(来自七个医学专业的 152 个咨询)。doktormitSDM 培训模块包括在医生工作场所进行的两次基于视频的个人辅导课程(每次 15 分钟),并辅以手册和视频教程。主要终点是 SDMmass 的复合测量(基于 MAPPIN'SDM 系统),该测量包含患者和观察者对参与的感知以及医患双方对感知参与的一致性。

结果

与对照组相比,干预组的 SDMmass 显著增加(效应大小 0.58;p=0.05;t 检验)。这种效果在随访时趋于持续(效应大小 0.63;p=0.06)。患者的感知参与也相应增加(效应大小分别为 0.9/0.58;p=0.01/0.07)。

结论

doktormitSDM 培训模块在提高 SDM 能力方面是有效和高效的。这是第一个使用复合措施同时考虑医生、患者和观察者评分的 SDM 培训。

实践意义

由于其非常简短的形式和对医生自己咨询视频的参考,doktormitSDM 培训模块满足了临床医生的需求和时间限制。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of the doktormitSDM training module in supporting shared decision making - Results from a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial.多中心、双盲、随机对照试验:doktormitSDM 培训模块在支持共同决策方面的疗效。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2331-2338. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions-Preliminary testing of a newly developed module.对医生进行简短的现场培训,让他们参与患者的医疗决策——新开发模块的初步测试。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1254-1263. doi: 10.1111/hex.12565. Epub 2017 May 18.
3
Investigating a training supporting Shared Decision Making (IT'S SDM 2011): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.调查一项支持共享决策制定的培训(IT'S SDM 2011):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Oct 26;12:232. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-232.
4
Development of PRIDe: a tool to assess physicians' preference of role in clinical decision making.PRIDe 工具的开发:评估医生在临床决策中角色偏好的工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
5
Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.实现参与:一项关于全科医疗中共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验的过程结果
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):337-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401.
6
Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肿瘤学家技能培训和患者沟通辅助工具对姑息性系统治疗决策共享的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e578-e588. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0453. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation.探索医患双方对于会诊中风险沟通和共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):198-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00235.x.
8
Evaluation of a shared decision-making communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma: a mixed methods study using simulated patients.评估一种用于治疗哮喘患者的医患沟通技能培训方案对医生的效果:一项使用模拟患者的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4445-y.
9
Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.基于患者的结局,来自一项在全科医疗中开展的关于共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验。
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):347-54. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh402.
10
Implementation of shared decision-making in oncology: development and pilot study of a nurse-led decision-coaching programme for women with ductal carcinoma in situ.肿瘤学中共享决策的实施:一项护士主导的决策辅导方案在导管原位癌女性中的开发和试点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0548-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making in Physical Therapist Care for People With Shoulder Problems: An Observer-Based Analysis of Audio-Recorded Consultations.物理治疗师对肩部问题患者的共同决策:基于观察的录音会诊分析
Phys Ther. 2025 Jun 2;105(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf047.
2
Development and preliminary evaluation of a decision coach training module for nurses in Norway.挪威护士决策指导培训模块的开发与初步评估
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 10;24(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02569-6.
3
Measuring healthcare professionals' perceptions of their ability to adopt shared decision making: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the IcanSDM questionnaire.
测量医疗保健专业人员对采用共享决策能力的看法:丹麦版 IcanSDM 问卷的翻译及心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02747-1.
4
Feasibility and acceptability of the ShareD dEciSIon making for patients with kidney failuRE to improve end-of-life care intervention: A pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial.为改善肾衰竭患者临终关怀而开展的共享决策干预的可行性与可接受性:一项多中心随机对照试验试点研究
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Aug 5;7:100231. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100231. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.
6
Inclusion of person-centred care in UK postgraduate medical education curricula: Interviews and documentary analysis.将以患者为中心的护理纳入英国研究生医学教育课程:访谈与文献分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04730-2.
7
The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation.共享决策制定的六个步骤:将理论与实践、测量及实施相联系。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):75-78. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289.
8
Effects of a shared decision making intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: the DICO study.多慢性病老年患者共享决策干预效果研究(DICO 研究)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Mar 1;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02099-2.
9
Effects and Working Mechanisms of a Multilevel Implementation Program for Applying Shared Decision-Making while Discussing Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer.多层面实施计划对乳腺癌系统治疗中应用共享决策的效果及作用机制
Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 23;30(1):236-249. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010019.
10
Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.个体反馈与辅导对肿瘤护理中共同决策咨询的有效性:一项随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 6;11(4):e35543. doi: 10.2196/35543.