• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation.

作者信息

Clayman Marla L, Scheibler Fülöp, Rüffer Jens Ulrich, Wehkamp Kai, Geiger Friedemann

机构信息

CHOIR, VA Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research Bedford Campus, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):75-78. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289
PMID:37673467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10982624/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5404/10982624/96ffc8e6ffd0/bmjebm-2023-112289f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5404/10982624/c4d438e34658/bmjebm-2023-112289f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5404/10982624/96ffc8e6ffd0/bmjebm-2023-112289f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5404/10982624/c4d438e34658/bmjebm-2023-112289f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5404/10982624/96ffc8e6ffd0/bmjebm-2023-112289f02.jpg

相似文献

1
The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation.共享决策制定的六个步骤：将理论与实践、测量及实施相联系。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):75-78. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289.
2
The paradox of using SDM for de-implementation of low-value care in the clinical encounter.在临床诊疗中使用共享决策制定（SDM）来减少低价值医疗服务的矛盾之处。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):14-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112201.
3
Contextualizing decisions: Stepping out of the SDM track.情境化决策：走出共享决策制定的轨道。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):815-816. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.024.
4
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评估癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案：一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.
5
Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.共同决策：概念、证据与实践。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
6
Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - a scoping review.影响共享决策实施的组织和系统层面的特征及应对策略：范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 9;13(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0731-z.
7
Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany.迈向以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策的德国模式。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Ready for SDM- evaluation of an interprofessional training module in shared decision making - A cluster randomized trial.准备进行共享决策中跨专业培训模块的SDM评估——一项整群随机试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2307-2314. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
9
Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.探索医疗服务提供者对决策辅助工具分发及共同决策的反应：来自两个专业领域的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Comparison of the CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 questionnaires to appreciate the patient-reported level of shared decision-making.比较 CollaboRATE 和 SDM-Q-9 问卷，以了解患者报告的共享决策水平。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2475-2479. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision making - a review of its evaluation, efficacy, and applicability in asthma.共同决策——对其在哮喘中的评估、疗效及适用性的综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 12;12:1639805. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1639805. eCollection 2025.
2
Response process validity of the 9-item shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a cognitive interview study with patients with cancer.在一项针对癌症患者的认知访谈研究中，9项共同决策问卷（SDM-Q-9）的反应过程效度。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 3;15(1):15479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99640-2.
3
"It's within your own power": shared decision-making to support transitions to buprenorphine.

本文引用的文献

1
Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.患者与临床医生在预防保健决策中的协作和共同决策，以及美国预防服务工作组的建议。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 22;327(12):1171-1176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.3267.
2
The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0.国际患者决策辅助工具标准（IPDAS）协作组织：证据更新2.0
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):729-733. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211035681. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
3
The effect of a scalable online training module for shared decision making based on flawed video examples - a randomized controlled trial.
“这掌握在你自己手中”：支持向丁丙诺啡过渡的共同决策。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 7;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00555-0.
4
Experiences and Perceptions of People With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers of Shared Decision-Making in Palliative Cancer Care.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者对姑息性癌症护理中共同决策的体验与认知。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4976-4988. doi: 10.1111/jan.16705. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
"Developing the tool SDM:KOMPASS. Supporting shared decision making implementation processes".开发工具 SDM:KOMPASS，支持共享决策制定实施过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0312990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312990. eCollection 2024.
6
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响：一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.
基于有缺陷视频示例的可扩展在线共享决策培训模块的效果 - 一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1568-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital.让共同决策（SDM）成为现实：德国北部一家大学医院大规模长期实施SDM项目的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575.
5
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.共同决策模型的关键组成部分：一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763.
6
A conceptual framework for patient-directed knowledge tools to support patient-centred care: Results from an evidence-informed consensus meeting.面向患者的知识工具支持以患者为中心的护理的概念框架：基于循证共识会议的结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Oct;102(10):1898-1904. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 4.
7
Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers: A cluster randomized controlled trial.护士主导的以患者为中心的决策咨询在乳腺保健中心对乳腺原位癌女性的应用：一项集群随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 May;93:141-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
Designing Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Dissemination and Sustainment: Can Implementation Science Help Translate Shared Decision Making Into Routine Practice?设计用于传播和维持的共享决策干预措施：实施科学能否助力将共享决策转化为常规实践？
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Dec 7;3(2):2381468318808503. doi: 10.1177/2381468318808503. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
9
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
10
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评估癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案：一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.