• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.
2
Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program.通过“分享关爱”计划大规模实施共同决策的可持续性。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1037447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447. eCollection 2022.
3
Comprehensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in a Neuromedical Center Using the SHARE TO CARE Program.在神经医学中心通过“共享关爱”计划全面实施共同决策
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 13;17:131-139. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S388432. eCollection 2023.
4
Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital.让共同决策(SDM)成为现实:德国北部一家大学医院大规模长期实施SDM项目的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575.
5
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
6
7
Effects of a shared decision-making implementation programme on patient-centred communication in oncology-Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.共享决策实施计划对肿瘤患者中心沟通的影响——一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14030. doi: 10.1111/hex.14030.
8
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评价癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
Implement Sci. 2021 Dec 29;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01174-4.
9
Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany.迈向以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策的德国模式。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Protocol for a pre-implementation and post-implementation study on shared decision-making in the surgical treatment of women with early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌女性手术治疗中共同决策的实施前与实施后研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 31;5(3):e007698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007698.

引用本文的文献

1
Sufficiency health-wise: sustainable paths towards planetary and public health.健康充足:通往地球与公众健康的可持续路径。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 19;12:1497657. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1497657. eCollection 2024.
2
Fostering Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Health Care Professionals in Clinical Practice Guidelines: Protocol for a Project to Develop and Test a Tool for Guideline Developers.在临床实践指南中促进患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的共享决策:为指南制定者开发和测试工具的项目的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 4;13:e57611. doi: 10.2196/57611.
3
Effects of a shared decision-making implementation programme on patient-centred communication in oncology-Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.共享决策实施计划对肿瘤患者中心沟通的影响——一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14030. doi: 10.1111/hex.14030.

本文引用的文献

1
The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation.共享决策制定的六个步骤:将理论与实践、测量及实施相联系。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):75-78. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289.
2
Major influencing factors on routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: qualitative process evaluation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.影响癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的主要因素:一项递进式整群随机试验的定性过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09778-w.
3
Metro Mapping: development of an innovative methodology to co-design care paths to support shared decision making in oncology.地铁式规划:开发一种创新方法以共同设计护理路径,支持肿瘤学中的共同决策。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):291-294. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112168. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
Caring without boundaries: delimiting shared decision-making.关怀无界:界定共同决策。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):226-227. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112184. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
5
The limits of shared decision making.共同决策的局限性。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):218-221. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112089. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program.通过“分享关爱”计划大规模实施共同决策的可持续性。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1037447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447. eCollection 2022.
7
Shared decision-making as a method of care.共同决策作为一种护理方法。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):213-217. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112068. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
8
Editorial: 20 years after the start of international Shared Decision-Making activities: Is it time to celebrate? Probably… .社论:国际共同决策活动开展20年后:是时候庆祝了吗?或许吧……
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 31.
9
New status report from Norway: Implementation of patient involvement in Norwegian health care.挪威的新现状报告:患者参与挪威医疗保健的实施情况。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.021. Epub 2022 May 23.
10
A scattered landscape: assessment of the evidence base for 71 patient decision aids developed in a hospital setting.分散的景观:对 71 种在医院环境中开发的患者决策辅助工具的证据基础的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01777-x.

德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。

Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.

机构信息

National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Köln, Germany

Department of Paediatrics I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462
PMID:37890982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10982630/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the SHARE TO CARE (S2C) programme, a complex intervention designed for hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making (SDM).

DESIGN

Pre-post study.

SETTING

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel Campus.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthcare professionals as well as inpatients and outpatients from 22 departments of the Kiel Campus of UKSH.

INTERVENTIONS

The S2C programme is a comprehensive implementation strategy including four core modules: (1) physician training, (2) SDM support training for and support by nurses as decision coaches, (3) patient activation and (4) evidence-based patient decision aid development and integration into patient pathways. After full implementation, departments received the S2C certificate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In this paper, we report on the feasibility and effectiveness outcomes of the implementation. Feasibility was judged by the degree of implementation of the four modules of the programme. Outcome measures for effectiveness are patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The primary outcome measure for effectiveness is the Patient Decision Making subscale of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS). Pre-post comparisons were done using t-tests.

RESULTS

The implementation of the four components of the S2C programme was able to be completed in 18 of the 22 included departments within the time frame of the study. After completion of implementation, PICS showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between the means compared with baseline. This difference corresponds to a small to medium yet clinically meaningful positive effect (Hedges' g=0.2). Consistent with this, the secondary PREMs (Preparation for Decision Making and collaboRATE) also showed statistically significant, clinically meaningful positive effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The hospital-wide implementation of SDM with the S2C-programme proved to be feasible and effective within the time frame of the project. The German Federal Joint Committee has recommended to make the Kiel model of SDM a national standard of care.

摘要

目的

评估 SHARE TO CARE(S2C)计划的可行性和有效性,该计划是为在全院范围内实施共享决策(SDM)而设计的复杂干预措施。

设计

前后研究。

地点

石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因大学医院(UKSH),基尔校区。

参与者

来自 UKSH 基尔校区 22 个科室的医疗保健专业人员以及住院患者和门诊患者。

干预措施

S2C 计划是一项全面的实施策略,包括四个核心模块:(1)医生培训,(2)护士作为决策教练的 SDM 支持培训和支持,(3)患者激活,(4)基于证据的患者决策辅助工具的开发和整合到患者路径中。全面实施后,科室将获得 S2C 证书。

主要结果测量

在本文中,我们报告了实施的可行性和有效性结果。可行性通过方案四个模块的实施程度来判断。有效性的结果测量是患者报告的体验测量(PREMs)。有效性的主要结果测量是参与护理量表(PICS)的患者决策子量表。使用 t 检验进行前后比较。

结果

在研究时间框架内,22 个纳入科室中有 18 个完成了 S2C 计划四个组成部分的实施。实施完成后,与基线相比,PICS 的平均值显示出统计学上的显著差异(p<0.01)。这一差异对应于小到中等但具有临床意义的积极影响(Hedges'g=0.2)。与此一致的是,次要 PREMs(决策准备和 collaboRATE)也显示出具有统计学意义和临床意义的积极效果。

结论

在项目时间框架内,通过 S2C 计划在全院范围内实施 SDM 被证明是可行且有效的。德国联邦联合委员会已建议将基尔 SDM 模式作为国家护理标准。