• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在难治性感染性休克中,同时使用血管加压素和氢化可的松治疗对短期血流动力学效应和血管加压药需求的影响。

Concomitant vasopressin and hydrocortisone therapy on short-term hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements in refractory septic shock.

机构信息

Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, Department of Pharmacy, 1111 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 E. Montview Blvd. V20-1227, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.016
PMID:28647651
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term hemodynamic effects as well as vasopressor requirements with concomitant vasopressin (AVP) and hydrocortisone (HCT) compared to either agent alone in refractory septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, cohort study conducted in adult septic shock patients. Patients received continuous infusion AVP at 0.04units/min and/or HCT 200-300mg intravenous daily in divided doses for refractory septic shock. Refractory septic shock was defined as systolic or mean blood pressure (MAP) of <90mmHg or <70mmHg, respectively, despite fluid resuscitation and requiring norepinephrine.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were evaluated. The rate of achieving a "response" (norepinephrine dose reduction by ≥50% without any decrease in MAP) at 4h from baseline was significantly higher in patients receiving concomitant AVP/HCT (88.5%) compared to HCT alone (62.3%) or AVP alone (72.9%) (p=0.0005). The AVP/HCT group had higher "response" rates over the HCT and AVP monotherapy groups at 12 (p=0.052) and 24h (p=0.036). Multivariate regression showed combination therapy to be independently associated with response at 4h.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant AVP and HCT was associated with an immediate, additive catecholamine-sparing effect over either agent alone in patients with refractory septic shock.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估与单一药物治疗相比,同时使用血管加压素(AVP)和氢化可的松(HCT)治疗难治性感染性休克的短期血流动力学效应和血管加压药需求。

材料和方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了成年感染性休克患者。患者接受持续静脉输注 AVP(0.04 单位/分钟)和/或 HCT(每日 200-300mg,分剂量静脉给药)治疗难治性感染性休克。难治性感染性休克定义为尽管进行了液体复苏,但仍存在收缩压或平均血压(MAP)<90mmHg 或分别<70mmHg,且需要去甲肾上腺素治疗。

结果

共评估了 300 例患者。与单独使用 HCT(62.3%)或 AVP(72.9%)相比,同时使用 AVP/HCT 的患者在基线 4 小时时达到“反应”(去甲肾上腺素剂量减少≥50%,而 MAP 无下降)的比例显著更高(88.5%)(p=0.0005)。与 HCT 和 AVP 单药治疗组相比,AVP/HCT 组在 12 小时(p=0.052)和 24 小时(p=0.036)时的“反应”率更高。多变量回归显示,联合治疗与 4 小时时的反应独立相关。

结论

在难治性感染性休克患者中,同时使用 AVP 和 HCT 可立即产生协同的儿茶酚胺节约作用,优于单一药物治疗。

相似文献

1
Concomitant vasopressin and hydrocortisone therapy on short-term hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements in refractory septic shock.在难治性感染性休克中,同时使用血管加压素和氢化可的松治疗对短期血流动力学效应和血管加压药需求的影响。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
2
The effects of vasopressin on systemic hemodynamics in catecholamine-resistant septic and postcardiotomy shock: a retrospective analysis.血管加压素对儿茶酚胺抵抗性脓毒症和心脏术后休克患者全身血流动力学的影响:一项回顾性分析
Anesth Analg. 2001 Jul;93(1):7-13. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200107000-00003.
3
Effect of Body Weight on Hemodynamic Response in Patients Receiving Fixed-Dose Vasopressin for Septic Shock.体重对接受固定剂量血管加压素治疗感染性休克患者血流动力学反应的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;50(10):816-23. doi: 10.1177/1060028016656384. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
Effects of continuous vasopressin infusion in patients with septic shock.持续输注血管加压素对感染性休克患者的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1117-22. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D513. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
5
Beneficial effects of short-term vasopressin infusion during severe septic shock.严重脓毒症休克期间短期输注血管加压素的有益作用。
Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):576-82. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00011.
6
Influence of Timing and Catecholamine Requirements on Vasopressin Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients with Septic Shock.危重症脓毒性休克患者血管加压素反应性的时机和儿茶酚胺需求的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1512-1519. doi: 10.1177/08850666221081836. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
7
Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock (TERLIVAP): a randomized, controlled pilot study.连续特利加压素与血管加压素输注治疗感染性休克(TERLIVAP):一项随机对照的初步研究。
Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R130. doi: 10.1186/cc7990. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
8
Hemodynamic Response to Vasopressin Dosage of 0.03 Units/Min vs. 0.04 Units/Min in Patients With Septic Shock.血管加压素剂量为 0.03 单位/分钟与 0.04 单位/分钟对感染性休克患者血流动力学反应的比较。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):92-99. doi: 10.1177/0885066620977181. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
Evaluation of Vasopressin for Septic Shock in Patients on Chronic Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors.慢性肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗的脓毒性休克患者使用血管加压素的评估
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):e1226-e1232. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002729.
10
Hypotension Risk Based on Vasoactive Agent Discontinuation Order in Patients in the Recovery Phase of Septic Shock.基于血管活性药物停用医嘱的脓毒性休克复苏期患者低血压风险
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Mar;38(3):319-326. doi: 10.1002/phar.2082. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemodynamic effects of adjunct arginine vasopressin to norepinephrine in septic shock: insights from a prospective multicenter registry study.脓毒性休克中精氨酸血管加压素辅助去甲肾上腺素的血流动力学效应:一项前瞻性多中心注册研究的见解
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01472-w.