US-guided core-needle biopsy versus US-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspicious cervical lymph nodes for staging workup of non-head and neck malignancies: A propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare US-guided core-needle biopsy (USCNB) and US-guided fine-needle aspiration (USFNA) of suspicious cervical lymph nodes for staging workup of malignancies in locations other than the head and neck using propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 108 patients who underwent USFNA and 1058 who underwent USCNB for suspicious cervical lymph nodes detected by imaging modalities during the staging workup for malignancies located in regions other than the head and neck. The primary outcome was defined as the inconclusive results. To evaluate the procedures according to the outcome, we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and a 1:1 PSM of USCNB and USFNA.

RESULTS

There was no complication for both USFNA and USCNB. The inconclusive results were 6.5% (7/108) for USFNA and 1.6% (17/1058) for USCNB. A significantly lower rate of the inconclusive results in USCNB than in USFNA before matching was maintained after a 1:1 PSM of 103 patients from each group (before PSM, odds ratio (OR) = 4.489, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.803-11.177], P = 0.001; after PSM, OR = 1.060, 95%CI [1.013-1.109], P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Because USCNB can reduce inconclusive results compared to USFNA, it could be more helpful for staging workup of malignancies in locations other than the head and neck in patients with suspicious cervical lymph nodes.