Graneheim Ulla H, Lindgren Britt-Marie, Lundman Berit
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Health Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Sep;56:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
This discussion paper is aimed to map content analysis in the qualitative paradigm and explore common methodological challenges. We discuss phenomenological descriptions of manifest content and hermeneutical interpretations of latent content. We demonstrate inductive, deductive, and abductive approaches to qualitative content analysis, and elaborate on the level of abstraction and degree of interpretation used in constructing categories, descriptive themes, and themes of meaning. With increased abstraction and interpretation comes an increased challenge to demonstrate the credibility and authenticity of the analysis. A key issue is to show the logic in how categories and themes are abstracted, interpreted, and connected to the aim and to each other. Qualitative content analysis is an autonomous method and can be used at varying levels of abstraction and interpretation.
本讨论文件旨在梳理定性范式中的内容分析，并探讨常见的方法学挑战。我们讨论了显性内容的现象学描述和隐性内容的诠释学解释。我们展示了定性内容分析的归纳、演绎和溯因方法，并详细阐述了在构建类别、描述性主题和意义主题时所使用的抽象层次和解释程度。随着抽象和解释程度的增加，证明分析的可信度和真实性面临的挑战也在增加。一个关键问题是要展示类别和主题是如何被抽象、解释并与目标以及彼此之间建立联系的逻辑。定性内容分析是一种自主的方法，可用于不同的抽象和解释层次。
