• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟淋巴结清扫延迟超过 3 个月预示着阴茎癌患者无复发生存率更差。

Delay to Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Greater than 3 Months Predicts Poorer Recurrence-Free Survival for Patients with Penile Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1346-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.076. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.076
PMID:28652123
Abstract

PURPOSE

To our knowledge it is unknown whether concomitant inguinal lymph node dissection at the time of penectomy improves outcomes in patients with penile cancer. We analyzed predictors of regional recurrence as well as disease specific survival based on time of inguinal lymph node dissection. We also determined an optimal time to perform inguinal lymph node dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 84 consecutive patients with available nodal pathology findings. Recurrence-free and disease specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Optimal time to inguinal lymph node dissection was assessed by ROC curves and used for dichotomization. Cox proportional HRs were used to identify predictors of regional recurrence after inguinal lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 47 (56%) and 37 patients (44%) presented with cN0 and cN+ disease, respectively, during a median followup of 21 months. A cutoff point of 3 months to perform inguinal lymph node dissection was used to dichotomize the cohort into early vs delayed groups. Early dissection in 51 men demonstrated 5-year recurrence-free survival of 77% vs 37.8% in 33 who underwent delayed dissection. Positive node disease (HR 23.2, 95% CI 2.98-181.2) and early inguinal lymph node dissection (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.21-0.98) were predictors of regional recurrence. Five-year disease specific survival was 64.1% and 39.5% in the early and late dissection groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Three months appears to be an optimal window for performing inguinal lymph node dissection. While prospective trials are needed to define the role of upfront groin dissection, our results may help delineate patterns of referral and timing of inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer.

摘要

目的

据我们所知,阴茎癌患者行阴茎切除术时同时进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫是否能改善预后尚不清楚。我们分析了基于腹股沟淋巴结清扫时间的局部复发和疾病特异性生存的预测因素。我们还确定了进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫的最佳时间。

材料和方法

我们回顾了 84 例连续患者的记录,这些患者有可供分析的淋巴结病理结果。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计无复发生存率和疾病特异性生存率。通过 ROC 曲线评估腹股沟淋巴结清扫的最佳时间,并用于二分类。使用 Cox 比例 HR 来确定腹股沟淋巴结清扫后局部复发的预测因素。

结果

在中位随访 21 个月期间,共有 47 例(56%)和 37 例(44%)患者分别表现为 cN0 和 cN+疾病。将 3 个月的时间作为进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫的时间点来将队列分为早期和延迟组。51 例早期行腹股沟淋巴结清扫的患者 5 年无复发生存率为 77%,而 33 例延迟行腹股沟淋巴结清扫的患者为 37.8%。阳性淋巴结疾病(HR 23.2,95%CI 2.98-181.2)和早期腹股沟淋巴结清扫(HR 0.48,95%CI 0.21-0.98)是局部复发的预测因素。5 年疾病特异性生存率分别为早期和晚期组的 64.1%和 39.5%。

结论

3 个月似乎是进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫的最佳时间窗口。虽然需要前瞻性试验来确定 upfront groin dissection 的作用,但我们的结果可能有助于描绘阴茎癌患者腹股沟淋巴结清扫的转诊模式和时间安排。

相似文献

1
Delay to Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Greater than 3 Months Predicts Poorer Recurrence-Free Survival for Patients with Penile Cancer.腹股沟淋巴结清扫延迟超过 3 个月预示着阴茎癌患者无复发生存率更差。
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1346-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.076. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Concomitant vs Staged Therapeutic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Node Positive Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does It Make a Difference?同期与分期治疗腹股沟淋巴结在临床淋巴结阳性阴茎鳞状细胞癌中的作用:有区别吗?
J Urol. 2023 Mar;209(3):557-564. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003099. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗具有淋巴结侵犯高风险的阴茎癌的长期随访。
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.025.
4
Clinical Outcomes in Clinical N0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis According to Nodal Management: Early, Delayed or Selective (following Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy) Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection.根据淋巴结管理情况,阴茎临床 N0 鳞状细胞癌的临床结局:早期、延迟或选择性(继动态前哨淋巴结活检后)腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。
J Urol. 2021 Aug;206(2):354-363. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001775. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
5
Salvage surgical resection for isolated locally recurrent inguinal lymph node metastasis of penile cancer: international study collaboration.挽救性手术切除治疗阴茎癌孤立性局部复发性腹股沟淋巴结转移:国际研究协作。
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):760-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2563. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
6
Patterns of Recurrence following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: Optimizing Surveillance Strategies.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后阴茎癌复发模式:优化监测策略。
J Urol. 2021 Oct;206(4):960-969. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001790. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Surgical templates for inguinal lymph node dissection in cN0 penile cancer: A comparative study.cN0期阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的手术模板:一项比较研究。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Sep;41(9):393.e9-393.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
8
Factors associated with regional recurrence after lymph node dissection for penile squamous cell carcinoma.阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴结清扫术后区域复发的相关因素。
BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):591-597. doi: 10.1111/bju.13686. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
9
Lymph node density predicts recurrence and death after inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.淋巴结密度可预测阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后的复发及死亡情况。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Jan;58(1):20-26. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.20. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的阴茎鳞癌患者的预后价值。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):1085-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Management of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Penile Cancer: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges.阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的微创管理:最新进展与尚存挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;16(17):2935. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172935.
2
Regional lymph node mapping in patients with penile cancer undergoing radical inguinal lymph node dissection - a retrospective cohort study.根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌患者的区域淋巴结定位——一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2865-2873. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001160.
3
Epidemiological study of penile cancer in a northeastern state - Brazil.
巴西东北部一州阴茎癌的流行病学研究。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Nov 13;50:e20233586. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233586-en. eCollection 2023.
4
Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Skin Cancer Based on Clinical Studies.基于临床研究的前哨淋巴结活检在皮肤癌中的作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 22;15(13):3291. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133291.
5
The Goal of Achieving High-Quality Surgical First-Line Therapy in Patients with Penile Cancer Is Important; However, Some Collective Efforts Are Still Required in Order to Reach It. Comment on Brassetti et al. Combined Reporting of Surgical Quality and Cancer Control after Surgical Treatment for Penile Tumors with Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: The Achievement. 2023, , 1882-1892.实现阴茎癌高质量一线手术治疗的目标很重要;然而,要实现这一目标,仍需共同努力。评 Brassetti 等人的《腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后阴茎肿瘤手术质量和癌症控制的联合报告:成就》。2023 年,,1882-1892 页。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 19;30(4):4269-4274. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040325.
6
Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing.高危cN0期阴茎癌的预防性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:最佳手术时机
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 21;13:1069284. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1069284. eCollection 2023.
7
Impact of COVID-19 on Uro-Oncological Patients: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.2019冠状病毒病对泌尿肿瘤患者的影响:文献综述
Microorganisms. 2023 Jan 10;11(1):176. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010176.
8
Triaging urological surgeries to cope with the coronavirus-19 pandemic.对泌尿外科手术进行分类,以应对新冠疫情。
Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):131-140. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000956.
9
The Evolving Clinical Management of Genitourinary Cancers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间泌尿生殖系统癌症不断发展的临床管理
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 27;11:734963. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.734963. eCollection 2021.
10
Management of urologic cancers during the pandemic and potential impact of treatment deferrals on outcomes.在大流行期间管理泌尿系统癌症以及治疗延迟对结果的潜在影响。
Urol Oncol. 2021 May;39(5):258-267. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 28.