Houshmand Behzad, Janbakhsh Noushin, Khalilian Fatemeh, Talebi Ardakani Mohammad Reza
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Spring;8(2):88-94. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.16. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Diode laser irradiation has recently shown promising results for treatment of gingival pigmentation. This study sought to compare the efficacy of 2 diode laser irradiation protocols for treatment of gingival pigmentations, namely the conventional method and the sieve method. In this split-mouth clinical trial, 15 patients with gingival pigmentation were selected and their pigmentation intensity was determined using Dummett's oral pigmentation index (DOPI) in different dental regions. Diode laser (980 nm wavelength and 2 W power) was irradiated through a stipple pattern (sieve method) and conventionally in the other side of the mouth. Level of pain and satisfaction with the outcome (both patient and periodontist) were measured using a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) for both methods. Patients were followed up at 2 weeks, one month and 3 months. Pigmentation levels were compared using repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA). The difference in level of pain and satisfaction between the 2 groups was analyzed by sample t test and general estimate equation model. No significant differences were found regarding the reduction of pigmentation scores and pain and scores between the 2 groups. The difference in satisfaction with the results at the three time points was significant in both conventional and sieve methods in patients ( = 0.001) and periodontists ( = 0.015). Diode laser irradiation in both methods successfully eliminated gingival pigmentations. The sieve method was comparable to conventional technique, offering no additional advantage.
二极管激光照射最近在治疗牙龈色素沉着方面显示出了有前景的结果。本研究旨在比较两种二极管激光照射方案治疗牙龈色素沉着的疗效,即传统方法和筛网法。在这项双侧对照临床试验中,选择了15名牙龈色素沉着患者,并使用达米特口腔色素沉着指数(DOPI)在不同牙区确定其色素沉着强度。二极管激光(波长980nm,功率2W)通过点纹模式(筛网法)进行照射,在口腔另一侧采用传统方法照射。使用0-10视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量两种方法的疼痛程度和对结果的满意度(患者和牙周病医生)。在2周、1个月和3个月时对患者进行随访。使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)比较色素沉着水平。通过样本t检验和一般估计方程模型分析两组之间疼痛程度和满意度的差异。两组在色素沉着评分降低以及疼痛和评分方面均未发现显著差异。在患者(P = 0.001)和牙周病医生(P = 0.015)中,传统方法和筛网法在三个时间点对结果的满意度差异均具有统计学意义。两种方法的二极管激光照射均成功消除了牙龈色素沉着。筛网法与传统技术相当,没有额外优势。