1Haliburton,Kawartha,Pine Ridge District Health Unit,200 Rose Glen Road,Port Hope,ON,Canada,L1A 3V6.
2Middlesex-London Health Unit,London,ON,Canada.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2406-2415. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001276. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
An absence of food literacy measurement tools makes it challenging for nutrition practitioners to assess the impact of food literacy on healthy diets and to evaluate the outcomes of food literacy interventions. The objective of the present scoping review was to identify the attributes of food literacy.
A scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted and attributes of food literacy identified. Subjects included in the search were high-risk groups. Eligible articles were limited to research from Canada, USA, the UK, Australia and New Zealand.
The search identified nineteen peer-reviewed and thirty grey literature sources. Fifteen identified food literacy attributes were organized into five categories. Food and Nutrition Knowledge informs decisions about intake and distinguishing between 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' foods. Food Skills focuses on techniques of food purchasing, preparation, handling and storage. Self-Efficacy and Confidence represent one's capacity to perform successfully in specific situations. Ecologic refers to beyond self and the interaction of macro- and microsystems with food decisions and behaviours. Food Decisions reflects the application of knowledge, information and skills to make food choices. These interdependent attributes are depicted in a proposed conceptual model.
The lack of evaluated tools inhibits the ability to assess and monitor food literacy; tailor, target and evaluate programmes; identify gaps in programming; engage in advocacy; and allocate resources. The present scoping review provides the foundation for the development of a food literacy measurement tool to address these gaps.
由于缺乏食物素养测量工具,营养从业者难以评估食物素养对健康饮食的影响,也难以评估食物素养干预的结果。本研究旨在确定食物素养的属性。
对同行评议和灰色文献进行了范围界定审查,并确定了食物素养的属性。纳入研究的对象是高危人群。搜索中纳入的合格文章仅限于来自加拿大、美国、英国、澳大利亚和新西兰的研究。
搜索确定了 19 篇同行评议和 30 篇灰色文献来源。15 个确定的食物素养属性被组织成五个类别。食物和营养知识指导关于摄入量的决策,并区分“健康”和“不健康”的食物。食品技能侧重于食品采购、准备、处理和储存的技术。自我效能和信心代表一个人在特定情况下成功执行的能力。生态指的是超越自我以及宏观和微观系统与食物决策和行为的相互作用。食物决策反映了知识、信息和技能在做出食物选择时的应用。这些相互依存的属性在一个提出的概念模型中得到了描绘。
缺乏经过评估的工具会阻碍评估和监测食物素养、调整、针对和评估方案、识别方案中的差距、参与宣传和分配资源的能力。本范围界定审查为开发食物素养测量工具提供了基础,以解决这些差距。