• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发 10 项家庭食物互动评估问卷(FIA-Q10)。

Development of the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10).

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5790 University Ave, Room 225, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada.

QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Nov 28;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01671-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-024-01671-x
PMID:39609806
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11603983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public health nutrition recommendations and clinical dietary interventions emphasize eating healthy food at home, implicitly requiring household foodwork. Household foodwork is defined as the physical and mental tasks a household does for eating meals and snacks. Because no tools exist to measure it, how much time people spend doing household foodwork and the foodwork barriers they experience remain unknown. The objective of the present research was to develop the first stand-alone household foodwork assessment tool.

METHODS

Through informal interviews with partners with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers, a literature review, a stakeholder meeting of advisors, and a two-round electronic Delphi process including face/content validation by expert panelists (n = 21), we developed the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10). An optional accompanying module was developed to collect self-identified demographic data to provide context for understanding how social-structural positionality factors may interact to influence foodwork.

RESULTS

The FIA-Q10 assesses the domains of household composition, frequency of eating at home, special diets within a household, foodwork stress intensity, foodwork barriers, desired supports related to foodwork, and time use for foodwork. The FIA-Q10 measures time use for four subdomains of foodwork among individuals and their households: (1) planning, (2) getting, (3) preparing/cooking, and (4) cleaning up food. In the second Delphi round, the FIA-Q10 scored 95% for language appropriateness, 67% for visual appropriateness, 95% for relevance, 95% for representativeness, and 95% for distribution. Suggested improvements were implemented. All Delphi panelists (100%) reported they would consider using the FIA-Q10.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIA-Q10's development is the first step towards a standardized assessment of foodwork, enabling examination of challenges in foodwork that may impact nutrition and nutrition equity. Future research will focus on FIA-Q10 validation in multiple populations.

摘要

背景

公共卫生营养建议和临床饮食干预强调在家中食用健康食品,这隐含地要求家庭进行食物相关工作。家庭食物相关工作是指家庭为了用餐和吃零食而进行的体力和脑力劳动。由于没有工具来衡量它,人们花费多少时间进行家庭食物相关工作以及他们所经历的食物相关工作障碍仍然未知。本研究的目的是开发第一个独立的家庭食物相关工作评估工具。

方法

通过与有生活经验的伴侣、临床医生和研究人员进行非正式访谈、文献回顾、顾问利益相关者会议以及两轮包括专家小组成员进行的面对面/内容验证的电子 Delphi 流程(n=21),我们开发了 10 个问题的家庭食物相关工作互动评估问卷(FIA-Q10)。还开发了一个可选的配套模块,用于收集自我识别的人口统计学数据,以提供理解社会结构性定位因素如何相互作用以影响食物相关工作的背景信息。

结果

FIA-Q10 评估了家庭构成、在家中用餐的频率、家庭中的特殊饮食、食物相关工作压力强度、食物相关工作障碍、与食物相关工作相关的期望支持以及食物相关工作时间利用等领域。FIA-Q10 测量个人及其家庭中食物相关工作的四个子领域的时间利用:(1)计划,(2)获取,(3)准备/烹饪,以及(4)清理食物。在第二轮 Delphi 中,FIA-Q10 在语言适宜性方面得分为 95%,在视觉适宜性方面得分为 67%,在相关性方面得分为 95%,在代表性方面得分为 95%,在分布方面得分为 95%。实施了改进建议。所有 Delphi 小组成员(100%)表示他们将考虑使用 FIA-Q10。

结论

FIA-Q10 的开发是对食物相关工作进行标准化评估的第一步,使我们能够检查可能影响营养和营养公平的食物相关工作挑战。未来的研究将集中在 FIA-Q10 在多个人群中的验证。

相似文献

1
Development of the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10).开发 10 项家庭食物互动评估问卷(FIA-Q10)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Nov 28;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01671-x.
2
How Does Time Use Differ between Individuals Who Do More versus Less Foodwork? A Compositional Data Analysis of Time Use in the United Kingdom Time Use Survey 2014-2015.多做家务和少做家务的人在时间利用上有何不同?基于 2014-2015 年英国时间利用调查的时间利用构成数据分析。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 30;12(8):2280. doi: 10.3390/nu12082280.
3
The association between fathers' childhood meal preparation experiences and current cooking skills in preparing healthy meals for children and foodwork involvement in Japan: a cross-sectional study.日本父亲童年时期的膳食准备经历与当前为孩子准备健康膳食的烹饪技能及食品工作参与度之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Glob Health Promot. 2024 Dec 9:17579759241298263. doi: 10.1177/17579759241298263.
4
Who's cooking tonight? A time-use study of coupled adults in Toronto, Canada.今晚谁做饭?加拿大多伦多成年伴侣的时间利用研究。
Time Soc. 2022 Nov;31(4):480-507. doi: 10.1177/0961463X221100696. Epub 2022 May 21.
5
A healthful home food environment: Is it possible amidst household chaos and parental stress?一个健康的家庭食品环境:在家庭混乱和父母压力下,这有可能实现吗?
Appetite. 2019 Nov 1;142:104391. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104391. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
A qualitative study exploring the dietary gatekeeper's food literacy and barriers to healthy eating in the home environment.一项探索家庭环境中饮食把关人食物素养及健康饮食障碍的定性研究。
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 2:292-300. doi: 10.1002/hpja.398. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Foodwork in the United Kingdom from 1983 to 2014: A compositional data analysis of repeat cross-sectional time use surveys.英国 1983 年至 2014 年的食物工作:重复横断面时间使用调查的成分数据分析。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105694. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105694. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
9
Prevalence and patterns of cooking dinner at home in the USA: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008.美国在家做晚餐的流行情况及模式:2007 - 2008年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)
Public Health Nutr. 2014 May;17(5):1022-30. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002589. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
10
Sociodemographic characteristics and frequency of consuming home-cooked meals and meals from out-of-home sources: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study.社会人口学特征与在家就餐和外出就餐频率:基于人群的横断面分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(12):2255-2266. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000812. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews.比较性定量环境系统评价中纳入研究的偏倚风险评估原则与框架。
Environ Evid. 2022;11. doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
Screening for poverty and related social determinants to improve knowledge of and links to resources (SPARK): development and cognitive testing of a tool for primary care.筛查贫困和相关社会决定因素以增强对资源的了解和联系(SPARK):初级保健工具的开发和认知测试。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 25;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02173-8.
3
Institutionalizing Community-engaged Translational Science in an Academic Institution: A Community Stakeholder-Driven Process.将社区参与式转化科学体制化于学术机构中:一个由社区利益相关者驱动的过程。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):485-493.
4
Diversity in patient and public involvement in healthcare research and education-Realising the potential.患者和公众参与医疗保健研究和教育的多样性——挖掘潜力。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13896. doi: 10.1111/hex.13896. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
5
Reducing Dietary Acid With Fruit and Vegetables Versus Oral Alkali in People With Chronic Kidney Disease (ReDACKD): A Clinical Research Protocol.慢性肾脏病患者通过水果和蔬菜与口服碱减少膳食酸摄入(ReDACKD):一项临床研究方案
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Aug 7;10:20543581231190180. doi: 10.1177/20543581231190180. eCollection 2023.
6
Feasibility and implementation of a grocery shopping intervention for adults diagnosed with or at-risk for type 2 diabetes.为诊断患有 2 型糖尿病或有患 2 型糖尿病风险的成年人实施杂货购物干预的可行性和实施情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Oct;26(10):2118-2129. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001453. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
7
Intersectionality, health equity, and EDI: What's the difference for health researchers?交叉性、健康公平和 EDI:对健康研究人员有何不同?
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Dec 19;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01795-1.
8
Foodwork in the United Kingdom from 1983 to 2014: A compositional data analysis of repeat cross-sectional time use surveys.英国 1983 年至 2014 年的食物工作:重复横断面时间使用调查的成分数据分析。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105694. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105694. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
9
Barriers and facilitators to participant adherence of dietary recommendations within comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a systematic review.综合心脏康复计划中参与者遵循饮食建议的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(15):4823-4839. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002962. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
10
Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods.定量研究中的交叉性:对其理论与方法的出现及应用的系统综述
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Apr 16;14:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798. eCollection 2021 Jun.