• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Longitudinal cognitive trajectories and associated clinical variables in youth with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍青少年的纵向认知轨迹及相关临床变量
Bipolar Disord. 2017 Jun;19(4):273-284. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12510. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Psychosocial functioning among bipolar youth.双相情感障碍青少年的心理社会功能
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
3
Clinical course of children and adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorders.双相谱系障碍儿童及青少年的临床病程
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;63(2):175-83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.175.
4
Predictors of longitudinal psychosocial functioning in bipolar youth transitioning to adults.双相青少年向成人过渡期间纵向心理社会功能的预测因素。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:578-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.108. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
Clinical and cognitive factors affecting psychosocial functioning in remitted patients with bipolar disorder.影响双相情感障碍缓解期患者心理社会功能的临床和认知因素。
Psychiatriki. 2016 Jul-Sep;27(3):182-191. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.182.
6
Cognitive flexibility and performance in children and adolescents with threshold and sub-threshold bipolar disorder.阈限及亚阈限双相情感障碍儿童和青少年的认知灵活性与表现
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;25(6):625-38. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0769-2. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Longitudinal trajectories and associated baseline predictors in youths with bipolar spectrum disorders.双相情感障碍谱系障碍青少年的纵向轨迹及相关基线预测因素
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;171(9):990-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13121577.
8
Longitudinal trajectories of mood symptoms and global functioning in youth at high risk for bipolar disorder.青少年双相情感障碍高危人群情绪症状和整体功能的纵向轨迹。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Four-year longitudinal course of children and adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorders: the Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) study.双相谱系障碍儿童和青少年的四年纵向病程:双相青少年的病程与转归(COBY)研究
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;166(7):795-804. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101569. Epub 2009 May 15.
10
Psychosocial disability in the course of bipolar I and II disorders: a prospective, comparative, longitudinal study.双相I型和II型障碍病程中的社会心理残疾:一项前瞻性、比较性、纵向研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1322-30. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1322.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and Opportunities in Using Cognitive Screeners for Adolescents and Young Adults With Bipolar Disorder.对双相情感障碍青少年及青年使用认知筛查工具的挑战与机遇
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2025 Apr;23(2):125-132. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20240045. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning in bipolar disorder: findings from the BIPLONG study.双相情感障碍中的认知能力与心理社会功能:BIPLONG研究的结果
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 20;19:1479648. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1479648. eCollection 2025.
3
Neurodevelopment as an alternative to neuroprogression to explain cognitive functioning in bipolar disorder.神经发育作为神经进展的替代机制来解释双相情感障碍中的认知功能。
Psychol Med. 2024 Dec 16;54(16):1-6. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724003210.
4
Identity state-dependent self-relevance and emotional intensity ratings of words in dissociative identity disorder: A controlled longitudinal study.身份状态相关的自我相关性和分离性身份障碍患者对词语的情绪强度评定:一项对照纵向研究。
Brain Behav. 2023 Oct;13(10):e3208. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3208. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Can circadian rhythm predict changes in neurocognitive functioning in bipolar disorder: protocol of a 12-month longitudinal cohort study based on research domain criteria.基于研究领域标准的 12 个月纵向队列研究:生物钟节律能否预测双相障碍患者神经认知功能的变化?研究方案。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2240422. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2240422.
6
Cognitive profiles in bipolar I disorder and associated risk factors: Using Wechsler adult intelligence scale-IV.双相I型障碍的认知概况及相关危险因素:使用韦氏成人智力量表第四版
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:951043. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951043. eCollection 2022.
7
Association of Lithium and Second-Generation Antipsychotics with Neurocognition in Youth with Bipolar Disorder.锂剂和第二代抗精神病药与双相情感障碍青少年神经认知的相关性。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2022 Feb;32(1):61-69. doi: 10.1089/cap.2021.0093. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
8
The Greater Houston Area Bipolar Registry-Clinical and Neurobiological Trajectories of Children and Adolescents With Bipolar Disorders and High-Risk Unaffected Offspring.大休斯顿地区双相情感障碍登记处——双相情感障碍儿童和青少年以及高风险未患病后代的临床和神经生物学轨迹
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 4;12:671840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.671840. eCollection 2021.
9
What Do We Know about the Long-Term Course of Early Onset Bipolar Disorder? A Review of the Current Evidence.我们对早发性双相情感障碍的长期病程了解多少?当前证据综述。
Brain Sci. 2021 Mar 8;11(3):341. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11030341.
10
Longitudinal course of depressive symptom severity among youths with bipolar disorders: Moderating influences of sustained attention and history of child maltreatment.双相障碍青少年抑郁症状严重程度的纵向病程:持续注意力和儿童期虐待史的调节影响。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:261-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.078. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The dysregulated brain: consequences of spatial and temporal brain complexity for bipolar disorder pathophysiology and diagnosis.失调的大脑:时空大脑复杂性对双相障碍病理生理学和诊断的影响。
Bipolar Disord. 2016 Dec;18(8):696-701. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12454. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
2
Areas of controversy in neuroprogression in bipolar disorder.双相障碍神经进展中的争议领域。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Aug;134(2):91-103. doi: 10.1111/acps.12581. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
3
Ten-year updated meta-analysis of the clinical characteristics of pediatric mania and hypomania.儿童躁狂症和轻躁狂症临床特征的十年更新荟萃分析
Bipolar Disord. 2016 Feb;18(1):19-32. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12358. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
4
Cognitive flexibility and performance in children and adolescents with threshold and sub-threshold bipolar disorder.阈限及亚阈限双相情感障碍儿童和青少年的认知灵活性与表现
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;25(6):625-38. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0769-2. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
5
Neuroprogression and Cognitive Functioning in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.双相情感障碍中的神经进展与认知功能:一项系统综述
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Sep;17(9):75. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0605-x.
6
Smaller than expected cognitive deficits in schizophrenia patients from the population-representative ABC catchment cohort.来自具有人群代表性的ABC流域队列研究中的精神分裂症患者认知缺陷比预期的要小。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Aug;266(5):423-31. doi: 10.1007/s00406-015-0625-x. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
7
Cognitive remediation: potential novel brain-based treatment for bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.认知康复:儿童和青少年双相情感障碍潜在的新型脑基治疗方法。
CNS Spectr. 2015 Aug;20(4):382-90. doi: 10.1017/S109285291500036X.
8
Facial emotion recognition in childhood-onset bipolar I disorder: an evaluation of developmental differences between youths and adults.儿童期起病的双相 I 型障碍中的面部情绪识别:青少年与成年人发育差异的评估
Bipolar Disord. 2015 Aug;17(5):471-85. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12312. Epub 2015 May 8.
9
The trajectory of neuropsychological dysfunctions in bipolar disorders: a critical examination of a hypothesis.双相障碍神经心理学功能障碍的轨迹:对一个假设的批判性检验。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr 1;175:396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Two-year follow-up of treated adolescents with early-onset bipolar disorder: Changes in neurocognition.双相障碍早发青少年经治疗后的两年随访:神经认知的变化。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.041. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

双相情感障碍青少年的纵向认知轨迹及相关临床变量

Longitudinal cognitive trajectories and associated clinical variables in youth with bipolar disorder.

作者信息

Frías Álvaro, Dickstein Daniel P, Merranko John, Gill Mary Kay, Goldstein Tina R, Goldstein Benjamin I, Hower Heather, Yen Shirley, Hafeman Danella M, Liao Fangzi, Diler Rasim, Axelson David, Strober Michael, Hunt Jeffrey I, Ryan Neal D, Keller Martin B, Birmaher Boris

机构信息

Adult Outpatient Mental Health Center, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Spain.

Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2017 Jun;19(4):273-284. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12510. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1111/bdi.12510
PMID:28653799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5517342/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is substantial interest in delineating the course of cognitive functioning in bipolar (BP) youth. However, there are no longitudinal studies aimed at defining subgroups of BP youth based on their distinctive cognitive trajectories and their associated clinical variables.

METHOD

Cognitive functioning was measured in 135 participants from the Course and Outcome of BP Youth (COBY) study using several subtests of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Youth were prospectively evaluated three times on average every 13.75 months over 2.5 years. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation (LIFE).

RESULTS

Latent class growth analysis identified three longitudinal patterns of cognitive functioning based on a general cognitive index: class 1, "persistently high" (N=21; 15.6%); class 2, "persistently moderate" (N=82; 60.74%); and class 3, "persistently low" (N=32; 23.7%). All classes showed normal cognitive functioning when compared with the CANTAB normative data. After adjustment for confounders, youth from class 3 had a significantly greater percentage of time with overall, manic, and depressive syndromal symptoms than youth in the other two classes. Also, after adjustment for confounders, youth from class 3 had significantly poorer global, academic, and social functioning than youth from class 1.

CONCLUSIONS

BP youth showed normal overall cognitive functioning that remained stable during the follow-up within each class. However, 24% of BP youth showed poorer cognitive functioning than the other BP youth. This subgroup had poorer mood course and functioning, and may benefit from cognitive remediation and early management with evidence-based pharmacological treatments.

摘要

目的

明确双相情感障碍(BP)青少年的认知功能发展过程受到了广泛关注。然而,目前尚无纵向研究旨在根据其独特的认知轨迹及其相关临床变量来定义BP青少年的亚组。

方法

在一项名为“BP青少年的病程与转归(COBY)”的研究中,使用剑桥神经心理测试自动成套系统(CANTAB)的几个子测试对135名参与者的认知功能进行了测量。在2.5年的时间里,这些青少年平均每13.75个月接受三次前瞻性评估。使用纵向间隔随访评估(LIFE)对临床和功能转归进行评估。

结果

潜在类别增长分析基于一般认知指数确定了三种认知功能的纵向模式:第1类,“持续高水平”(N = 21;15.6%);第2类,“持续中等水平”(N = 82;60.74%);第3类,“持续低水平”(N = 32;23.7%)。与CANTAB常模数据相比,所有类别均显示认知功能正常。在对混杂因素进行调整后,第3类青少年出现总体、躁狂和抑郁综合征症状的时间百分比显著高于其他两类青少年。此外,在对混杂因素进行调整后,第3类青少年的整体、学业和社会功能明显比第1类青少年差。

结论

BP青少年的总体认知功能正常,且在随访期间各亚组内保持稳定。然而,24%的BP青少年的认知功能比其他BP青少年差。这一亚组的情绪病程和功能较差,可能受益于认知康复以及基于循证药理学治疗的早期管理。