Frías Álvaro, Dickstein Daniel P, Merranko John, Gill Mary Kay, Goldstein Tina R, Goldstein Benjamin I, Hower Heather, Yen Shirley, Hafeman Danella M, Liao Fangzi, Diler Rasim, Axelson David, Strober Michael, Hunt Jeffrey I, Ryan Neal D, Keller Martin B, Birmaher Boris
Adult Outpatient Mental Health Center, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Spain.
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2017 Jun;19(4):273-284. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12510. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
There is substantial interest in delineating the course of cognitive functioning in bipolar (BP) youth. However, there are no longitudinal studies aimed at defining subgroups of BP youth based on their distinctive cognitive trajectories and their associated clinical variables.
Cognitive functioning was measured in 135 participants from the Course and Outcome of BP Youth (COBY) study using several subtests of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Youth were prospectively evaluated three times on average every 13.75 months over 2.5 years. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation (LIFE).
Latent class growth analysis identified three longitudinal patterns of cognitive functioning based on a general cognitive index: class 1, "persistently high" (N=21; 15.6%); class 2, "persistently moderate" (N=82; 60.74%); and class 3, "persistently low" (N=32; 23.7%). All classes showed normal cognitive functioning when compared with the CANTAB normative data. After adjustment for confounders, youth from class 3 had a significantly greater percentage of time with overall, manic, and depressive syndromal symptoms than youth in the other two classes. Also, after adjustment for confounders, youth from class 3 had significantly poorer global, academic, and social functioning than youth from class 1.
BP youth showed normal overall cognitive functioning that remained stable during the follow-up within each class. However, 24% of BP youth showed poorer cognitive functioning than the other BP youth. This subgroup had poorer mood course and functioning, and may benefit from cognitive remediation and early management with evidence-based pharmacological treatments.
明确双相情感障碍(BP)青少年的认知功能发展过程受到了广泛关注。然而,目前尚无纵向研究旨在根据其独特的认知轨迹及其相关临床变量来定义BP青少年的亚组。
在一项名为“BP青少年的病程与转归(COBY)”的研究中,使用剑桥神经心理测试自动成套系统(CANTAB)的几个子测试对135名参与者的认知功能进行了测量。在2.5年的时间里,这些青少年平均每13.75个月接受三次前瞻性评估。使用纵向间隔随访评估(LIFE)对临床和功能转归进行评估。
潜在类别增长分析基于一般认知指数确定了三种认知功能的纵向模式:第1类,“持续高水平”(N = 21;15.6%);第2类,“持续中等水平”(N = 82;60.74%);第3类,“持续低水平”(N = 32;23.7%)。与CANTAB常模数据相比,所有类别均显示认知功能正常。在对混杂因素进行调整后,第3类青少年出现总体、躁狂和抑郁综合征症状的时间百分比显著高于其他两类青少年。此外,在对混杂因素进行调整后,第3类青少年的整体、学业和社会功能明显比第1类青少年差。
BP青少年的总体认知功能正常,且在随访期间各亚组内保持稳定。然而,24%的BP青少年的认知功能比其他BP青少年差。这一亚组的情绪病程和功能较差,可能受益于认知康复以及基于循证药理学治疗的早期管理。