Cerejo Sofia A, Teixeira-Neto Francisco J, Garofalo Natache A, Rodrigues Jéssica C, Celeita-Rodríguez Nathalia, Lagos-Carvajal Angie P
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2017 Jul;27(4):409-418. doi: 10.1111/vec.12623. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
To compare the performance of 2 species-specific oscillometric blood pressure (OBP) monitors (petMAP and petMAP ) with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats.
Prospective, experimental study.
Veterinary teaching hospital.
Eight adult cats (3.2-5.5 kg).
During isoflurane anesthesia, OBP cuffs were placed on the thoracic limb and on the base of the tail while invasive blood pressure (IBP) was recorded from a dorsal pedal artery. End-tidal isoflurane concentrations, with or without intravenous dopamine (n = 8), norepinephrine (n = 1), or phenylephrine (n = 1) were adjusted to change invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 40 to 100 mm Hg. Data were analyzed by the Bland-Altman method and 4-quadrant plots.
Mean biases and limits of agreement (LOA: ± 1.96 SD) (mm Hg) recorded between the petMAP (thoracic limb) and IBP for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and MAP were 4.2 ± 28.5, -6.1 ± 13.2, and -1.9 ± 14.6, respectively; mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) recorded with the tail cuff were 7.2 ± 31.3 (SAP), -6.1 ± 11.6 (DAP), and -1.1 ± 11.7 (MAP). Mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) between petMAP (thoracic limb) and IBP were 7.7 ± 27.0 (SAP), -4.3 ± 11.5 (DAP), 0.2 ± 13.0 (MAP); values recorded with the tail cuff were 10.9 ± 29.6 (SAP), -4.4 ± 11.7 (DAP), and -0.1 ± 12.1 (MAP). Concordance rates after excluding arterial pressure changes ≤ 5 mm Hg was ≥ 93% for both devices.
Although both OBP monitors provide unacceptable SAP estimations, MAP values derived from both monitors and DAP measured by the petMAP result in acceptable agreement with the reference method according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (mean bias ≤ 5 mm Hg with LOA ≤ ± 16 mm Hg). Both monitors provide acceptable trending ability for SAP, DAP, and MAP.
比较2种特定物种的示波法血压(OBP)监测仪(宠物MAP和宠物MAP)与麻醉猫直接血压测量的性能。
前瞻性实验研究。
兽医教学医院。
8只成年猫(3.2 - 5.5千克)。
在异氟烷麻醉期间,将OBP袖带置于胸肢和尾根部,同时从背侧足背动脉记录有创血压(IBP)。调整呼气末异氟烷浓度,无论有无静脉注射多巴胺(n = 8)、去甲肾上腺素(n = 1)或去氧肾上腺素(n = 1),使有创平均动脉压(MAP)在40至100毫米汞柱之间变化。采用Bland - Altman方法和四象限图分析数据。
宠物MAP(胸肢)与IBP之间记录的收缩压(SAP)、舒张压(DAP)和MAP的平均偏差和一致性界限(LOA:±1.96 SD)(毫米汞柱)分别为4.2±28.5、 - 6.1±13.2和 - 1.9±14.6;尾袖带记录的平均偏差和LOA(毫米汞柱)分别为7.2±31.3(SAP)、 - 6.1±11.6(DAP)和 - 1.1±11.7(MAP)。宠物MAP(胸肢)与IBP之间的平均偏差和LOA(毫米汞柱)分别为7.7±27.0(SAP)、 - 4.3±11.5(DAP)、0.2±13.0(MAP);尾袖带记录的值分别为10.9±29.6(SAP)、 - 4.4±11.7(DAP)和 - 0.1±12.1(MAP)。排除动脉压变化≤5毫米汞柱后,两种设备的一致性率均≥93%。
尽管两种OBP监测仪对SAP的估计均不可接受,但根据医疗仪器促进协会的标准(平均偏差≤5毫米汞柱,LOA≤±16毫米汞柱),两种监测仪得出的MAP值和宠物MAP测量的DAP值与参考方法的一致性可接受。两种监测仪对SAP、DAP和MAP均具有可接受的趋势监测能力。