Sandhu Alexander T, Heidenreich Paul A, Bhattacharya Jay, Bundorf M Kate
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Center for Health Policy and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1175-1182. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2432.
Noninvasive testing and coronary angiography are used to evaluate patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, but their effects on outcomes are uncertain.
To determine whether cardiovascular testing-noninvasive imaging or coronary angiography-is associated with changes in the rates of coronary revascularization or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) admission in patients who present to the ED with chest pain without initial findings of ischemia.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort analysis used weekday (Monday-Thursday) vs weekend (Friday-Sunday) presentation as an instrument to adjust for unobserved case-mix variation (selection bias) between 2011 and 2012. National claims data (Truven MarketScan) was used. The data included a total of 926 633 privately insured patients ages 18 to 64 years who presented to the ED with chest pain without initial diagnosis consistent with acute ischemia.
Noninvasive testing or coronary angiography within 2 days or 30 days of presentation.
The primary end points were coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) and AMI admission at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days. The secondary end points were coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting in those who underwent angiography.
The patients were ages 18 to 64 years with an average age of 44.4 years. A total of 536 197 patients (57.9%) were women. Patients who received testing (224 973) had increased risk at baseline and had greater risk of AMI admission than those who did not receive testing (701 660) (0.35% vs 0.14% at 30 days). Weekday patients (571 988) had similar baseline comorbidities to weekend patients (354 645) but were more likely to receive testing. After risk factor adjustment, testing within 30 days was associated with a significant increase in coronary angiography (36.5 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 21.0-52.0) and revascularization (22.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 10.6-35.0) at 1 year but no significant change in AMI admissions (7.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, -1.4 to 17.0). Testing within 2 days was also associated with a significant increase in coronary revascularization but no difference in AMI admissions.
Cardiac testing in patients with chest pain was associated with increased downstream testing and treatment without a reduction in AMI admissions, suggesting that routine testing may not be warranted. Further research into whether specific high-risk subgroups benefit from testing is needed.
无创检测和冠状动脉造影用于评估因胸痛就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者,但它们对预后的影响尚不确定。
确定心血管检测——无创成像或冠状动脉造影——是否与因胸痛就诊于ED且初始无缺血表现的患者冠状动脉血运重建率或急性心肌梗死(AMI)入院率的变化相关。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列分析使用工作日(周一至周四)与周末(周五至周日)就诊作为一种手段,以调整2011年至2012年间未观察到的病例组合差异(选择偏倚)。使用了全国索赔数据(Truven MarketScan)。数据包括总共926633名年龄在18至64岁之间的私人保险患者,他们因胸痛就诊于ED且初始诊断与急性缺血不一致。
就诊后2天或30天内进行无创检测或冠状动脉造影。
主要终点是7天、30天、180天和365天时的冠状动脉血运重建(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术)和AMI入院。次要终点是接受血管造影的患者中的冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉旁路移植术。
患者年龄在18至64岁之间,平均年龄为44.4岁。共有536197名患者(57.9%)为女性。接受检测的患者(224973名)在基线时风险增加,且AMI入院风险高于未接受检测的患者(701660名)(30天时为0.35%对0.14%)。工作日就诊的患者(571988名)与周末就诊的患者(354645名)基线合并症相似,但更有可能接受检测。在调整风险因素后,30天内进行检测与1年时冠状动脉造影(每1000名接受检测的患者中有36.5例;95%CI,21.0 - 52.0)和血运重建(每1000名接受检测的患者中有22.8例;95%CI,10.6 - 35.0)显著增加相关,但AMI入院无显著变化(每1000名接受检测的患者中有7.8例;95%CI, - 1.4至17.0)。2天内进行检测也与冠状动脉血运重建显著增加相关,但AMI入院无差异。
胸痛患者的心脏检测与下游检测和治疗增加相关,但AMI入院率未降低,这表明常规检测可能不必要。需要进一步研究特定高危亚组是否从检测中获益。