• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Electronic Reminders, Financial Incentives, and Social Support on Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: The HeartStrong Randomized Clinical Trial.电子提醒、经济激励和社会支持对心肌梗死后结局的影响:HeartStrong随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1093-1101. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2449.
2
Effect of Patient Financial Incentives on Statin Adherence and Lipid Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者经济激励对他汀类药物依从性和血脂控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19429.
3
The Habit Formation trial of behavioral economic interventions to improve statin use and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease: Rationale, design and methodologies.行为经济学干预措施养成习惯试验,以提高他汀类药物的使用并降低心血管疾病风险:原理、设计和方法学。
Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;16(4):399-409. doi: 10.1177/1740774519846852. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Association of a P2Y12 Inhibitor Copayment Reduction Intervention With Persistence and Adherence With Other Secondary Prevention Medications: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ARTEMIS Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.P2Y12 抑制剂共付额降低干预与其他二级预防药物的持续性和依从性的关联:ARTEMIS 集群随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;5(1):38-46. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4408.
5
Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.对医生、患者或双方的经济激励对血脂水平的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 10;314(18):1926-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.14850.
6
Interventions supporting long term adherence and decreasing cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction (ISLAND): pragmatic randomised controlled trial.干预措施支持心肌梗死后长期坚持并减少心血管事件(ISLAND):实用随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 10;369:m1731. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1731.
7
Partners and Alerts in Medication Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.药物依从性的伴侣和提醒:一项随机临床试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1536-1542. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4389-7. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Using a tailored health information technology- driven intervention to improve health literacy and medication adherence in a Pakistani population with vascular disease (Talking Rx) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.采用定制的健康信息技术驱动干预措施提高巴基斯坦血管疾病患者的健康素养和药物依从性(Talking Rx)——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 5;17(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1244-1.
9
Association of β-Blockers With Functional Outcomes, Death, and Rehospitalization in Older Nursing Home Residents After Acute Myocardial Infarction.β受体阻滞剂与老年疗养院居民急性心肌梗死后功能结局、死亡及再住院的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):254-262. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7701.
10
Full coverage for preventive medications after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后的预防性药物全覆盖。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 1;365(22):2088-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1107913. Epub 2011 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic Health Record Interventions to Reduce Risk of Hospital Readmissions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康记录干预措施以降低医院再入院风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521785. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21785.
2
Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence to statins in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.二级心血管预防中衡量他汀类药物依从性的方法和有效性指标:一项系统评价
Syst Rev. 2025 May 15;14(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02853-9.
3
Nudging Health Behavior Change Among Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: A Scoping Review.推动居家心脏康复患者的健康行为改变:一项范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Mar 19;18:1639-1653. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S515523. eCollection 2025.
4
Leveraging Habits to Improve Adherence to Gout Medications: A Qualitative Study.利用习惯提高痛风药物依从性:一项定性研究。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024 Oct;6(10):625-633. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11706. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
5
Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Improving Medication Adherence Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康干预措施在提高心血管疾病患者药物依从性方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 15;26:e58013. doi: 10.2196/58013.
6
Using mobile health to expedite access to specialty care for youth presenting to the emergency department with concussion at highest risk of developing persisting symptoms: a protocol paper for a non-randomised hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.利用移动医疗加速高危创伤性脑损伤青少年患者获得专科医疗服务:一项非随机混合实施有效性试验的方案研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 19;14(6):e082644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082644.
7
Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring With Social Support for Patients With Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.远程血压监测联合社会支持用于高血压患者:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2413515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13515.
8
The impact of using reinforcement learning to personalize communication on medication adherence: findings from the REINFORCE trial.使用强化学习实现个性化沟通对药物依从性的影响:REINFORCE试验的结果
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 19;7(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01028-5.
9
Effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation programs on medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏康复计划对心血管疾病患者药物依从性的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Dec 12;20:200229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200229. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Optimising the implementation of digital-supported interventions for the secondary prevention of heart disease: a systematic review using the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework.优化数字支持干预措施在心脏病二级预防中的实施:使用 RE-AIM 规划和评估框架进行的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 4;23(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10361-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated Reminders and Physician Notification to Promote Immunosuppression Adherence Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Trial.自动化提醒和医生通知以促进肾移植受者免疫抑制药物依从性:一项随机试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Mar;69(3):400-409. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
2
Statin non-adherence and residual cardiovascular risk: There is need for substantial improvement.他汀类药物治疗依从性不佳与心血管残留风险:仍需大幅改善。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 15;225:184-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.075. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Rationale and design of a randomized trial of automated hovering for post-myocardial infarction patients: The HeartStrong program.心肌梗死后患者自动悬停随机试验的原理与设计:心脏强化计划
Am Heart J. 2016 Sep;179:166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
Treatment, Outcomes, and Adherence to Medication Regimens Among Dual Medicare-Medicaid-Eligible Adults With Myocardial Infarction.双重符合医疗保险-医疗补助资格的成年人心肌梗死的治疗、结果和药物治疗方案的依从性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;1(7):787-794. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2724.
5
Statin non-adherence: clinical consequences and proposed solutions.他汀类药物治疗依从性不佳:临床后果及建议解决方案
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 21;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8215.1. eCollection 2016.
6
Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.再入院、观察和医院再入院率降低计划。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1543-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1513024. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
7
Framing Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Overweight and Obese Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.设定经济激励措施以增加超重和肥胖成年人的身体活动:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):385-94. doi: 10.7326/M15-1635. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.对医生、患者或双方的经济激励对血脂水平的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 10;314(18):1926-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.14850.
9
Making the RCT more useful for innovation with evidence-based evolutionary testing.基于循证进化测试的 RCT 更有利于创新。
Healthc (Amst). 2013 Jun;1(1-2):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 9.
10
Randomized trial of four financial-incentive programs for smoking cessation.四项戒烟经济激励方案的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2108-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414293. Epub 2015 May 13.

电子提醒、经济激励和社会支持对心肌梗死后结局的影响:HeartStrong随机临床试验

Effect of Electronic Reminders, Financial Incentives, and Social Support on Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: The HeartStrong Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Volpp Kevin G, Troxel Andrea B, Mehta Shivan J, Norton Laurie, Zhu Jingsan, Lim Raymond, Wang Wenli, Marcus Noora, Terwiesch Christian, Caldarella Kristen, Levin Tova, Relish Mike, Negin Nathan, Smith-McLallen Aaron, Snyder Richard, Spettell Claire M, Drachman Brian, Kolansky Daniel, Asch David A

机构信息

Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1093-1101. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2449.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2449
PMID:28654972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710431/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Adherence to medications prescribed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is low. Wireless technology and behavioral economic approaches have shown promise in improving health behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a system of medication reminders using financial incentives and social support delays subsequent vascular events in patients following AMI compared with usual care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two-arm, randomized clinical trial with a 12-month intervention conducted from 2013 through 2016. Investigators were blinded to study group, but participants were not. Design was a health plan-intermediated intervention for members of several health plans. We recruited 1509 participants from 7179 contacted AMI survivors (insured with 5 large US insurers nationally or with Medicare fee-for-service at the University of Pennsylvania Health System). Patients aged 18 to 80 years were eligible if currently prescribed at least 2 of 4 study medications (statin, aspirin, β-blocker, antiplatelet agent), and were hospital inpatients for 1 to 180 days and discharged home with a principal diagnosis of AMI.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to an intervention using electronic pill bottles combined with lottery incentives and social support for medication adherence (1003 patients), or to usual care (506 patients).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome was time to first vascular rehospitalization or death. Secondary outcomes were time to first all-cause rehospitalization, total number of repeated hospitalizations, medication adherence, and total medical costs.

RESULTS

A total of 35.5% of participants were female (n = 536); mean (SD) age was 61.0 (10.3) years. There were no statistically significant differences between study arms in time to first rehospitalization for a vascular event or death (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.52; P = .84), time to first all-cause rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.09; P = .27), or total number of repeated hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.48; P = .79). Mean (SD) medication adherence did not differ between control (0.42 [0.39]) and intervention (0.46 [0.39]) (difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.09; P = .10). Mean (SD) medical costs in 12 months following enrollment did not differ between control ($29 811 [$74 850]) and intervention ($24 038 [$66 915]) (difference, -$5773; 95% CI, -$13 682 to $2137; P = .15).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A compound intervention integrating wireless pill bottles, lottery-based incentives, and social support did not significantly improve medication adherence or vascular readmission outcomes for AMI survivors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01800201.

摘要

重要性

急性心肌梗死(AMI)后患者对所开药物的依从性较低。无线技术和行为经济学方法在改善健康行为方面已显示出前景。

目的

确定与常规护理相比,使用经济激励和社会支持的药物提醒系统是否能延迟AMI患者随后发生的血管事件。

设计、设置和参与者:双臂随机临床试验,于2013年至2016年进行了为期12个月的干预。研究人员对研究组不知情,但参与者知情。设计为针对几个健康计划成员的健康计划介导干预。我们从7179名被联系的AMI幸存者中招募了1509名参与者(在美国全国5家大型保险公司投保或在宾夕法尼亚大学医疗系统参加医疗保险按服务收费)。年龄在18至80岁之间的患者,如果目前正在服用4种研究药物(他汀类药物、阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、抗血小板药物)中的至少2种,并且住院1至180天且出院时主要诊断为AMI,则符合条件。

干预措施

患者按2:1随机分组,一组采用电子药瓶结合彩票激励和社会支持以促进药物依从性的干预措施(1003名患者),另一组接受常规护理(506名患者)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是首次血管再住院或死亡的时间。次要结局是首次全因再住院的时间、重复住院的总数、药物依从性和总医疗费用。

结果

共有35.5%的参与者为女性(n = 536);平均(标准差)年龄为61.0(10.3)岁。在首次因血管事件再住院或死亡的时间(风险比,1.04;95%置信区间,0.71至1.52;P = 0.84)、首次全因再住院的时间(风险比,0.89;95%置信区间,0.73至1.09;P = 0.27)或重复住院的总数(风险比,0.94;95%置信区间,0.60至1.48;P = 0.79)方面,研究组之间无统计学显著差异。对照组(0.42 [0.39])和干预组(0.46 [0.39])的平均(标准差)药物依从性无差异(差异,0.04;95%置信区间,-0.01至0.09;P = 0.10)。入组后12个月的平均(标准差)医疗费用在对照组(29811美元[74850美元])和干预组(24038美元[66915美元])之间无差异(差异,-5773美元;95%置信区间,-13682美元至2137美元;P = 0.15)。

结论及相关性

综合无线药瓶、基于彩票的激励措施和社会支持的复合干预措施,并未显著改善AMI幸存者的药物依从性或血管再入院结局。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01800201。