• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阻断式和随机练习计划对获得性言语失用症声音产生治疗结果的影响:一项分组调查的结果

Effects of Blocked and Random Practice Schedule on Outcomes of Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Results of a Group Investigation.

作者信息

Wambaugh Julie L, Nessler Christina, Wright Sandra, Mauszycki Shannon C, DeLong Catharine, Berggren Kiera, Bailey Dallin J

机构信息

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, UtahUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City.

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Utah.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 22;60(6S):1739-1751. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0249.

DOI:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0249
PMID:28655045
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects of schedule of practice (i.e., blocked vs. random) on outcomes of Sound Production Treatment (SPT; Wambaugh, Kalinyak-Fliszar, West, & Doyle, 1998) for speakers with chronic acquired apraxia of speech and aphasia.

METHOD

A combination of group and single-case experimental designs was used. Twenty participants each received SPT administered with randomized stimuli presentation (SPT-R) and SPT applied with blocked stimuli presentation (SPT-B). Treatment effects were examined with respect to accuracy of articulation as measured in treated and untreated experimental words produced during probes.

RESULTS

All participants demonstrated improved articulation of treated items with both practice schedules. Effect sizes were calculated to estimate magnitude of change for treated and untreated items by treatment condition. No significant differences were found for SPT-R and SPT-B relative to effect size. Percent change over the highest baseline performance was also calculated to provide a clinically relevant indication of improvement. Change scores associated with SPT-R were significantly higher than those for SPT-B for treated items but not untreated items.

CONCLUSION

SPT can result in improved articulation regardless of schedule of practice. However, SPT-R may result in greater gains for treated items.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5116831.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较练习安排(即集中练习与随机练习)对患有慢性获得性言语失用症和失语症的患者进行语音产生治疗(SPT;Wambaugh、Kalinyak-Fliszar、West和Doyle,1998)的效果。

方法

采用组间和单病例实验设计相结合的方法。20名参与者分别接受了随机刺激呈现的SPT(SPT-R)和集中刺激呈现的SPT(SPT-B)。通过在探测过程中产生的已治疗和未治疗实验单词中测量的发音准确性来检查治疗效果。

结果

所有参与者在两种练习安排下,已治疗项目的发音均有改善。计算效应量以估计按治疗条件划分的已治疗和未治疗项目的变化幅度。在效应量方面,SPT-R和SPT-B没有显著差异。还计算了相对于最高基线表现的百分比变化,以提供临床上相关的改善指标。对于已治疗项目,与SPT-R相关的变化分数显著高于SPT-B,但未治疗项目并非如此。

结论

无论练习安排如何,SPT都可导致发音改善。然而,SPT-R可能会使已治疗项目获得更大的进步。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5116831 。

相似文献

1
Effects of Blocked and Random Practice Schedule on Outcomes of Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Results of a Group Investigation.阻断式和随机练习计划对获得性言语失用症声音产生治疗结果的影响:一项分组调查的结果
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 22;60(6S):1739-1751. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0249.
2
Sound production treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Effects of blocked and random practice on multisyllabic word production.后天性言语失用症的发声治疗:分组练习和随机练习对多音节词发声的影响。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Oct;18(5):450-64. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1101161. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
Effects of Treatment Intensity on Outcomes in Acquired Apraxia of Speech.治疗强度对获得性运动性言语失用症结局的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):306-322. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0188.
4
Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: An Examination of Dosage in Relation to Probe Performance.获得性言语失用症的发声治疗:对探针表现相关剂量的考察。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Feb 11;30(1S):425-440. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00110. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule.获得性言语失用症的治疗:治疗强度和练习时间表的检查。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Feb;22(1):84-102. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0025). Epub 2012 Oct 15.
6
Sound production treatment: effects of blocked and random practice.发声治疗:阻塞式练习与随机练习的效果
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 May;23(2):S225-45. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0072.
7
Combined Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech Treatment (CAAST): effects of a novel therapy.联合失语症与言语失用症治疗(CAAST):一种新型疗法的效果
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2191-207. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-14-0004.
8
Further Study of the Effects of Treatment Intensity on Outcomes of Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Does Dose Frequency Matter?治疗强度对获得性言语失用症发声治疗效果的进一步研究:剂量频率重要吗?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):263-285. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00005. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
9
A Comparison of Sound Production Treatment and Metrical Pacing Therapy for Apraxia of Speech: A Single-Case Experimental Design.言语失用症的发声治疗与韵律节奏疗法比较:单病例实验设计
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2493-2511. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00302. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
10
The Outcomes of Remote Administration of Combined Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech Treatment: A Single-Subject Experimental Design Study.远程联合失语症和言语失用症治疗的效果:一项单病例实验设计研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2402-2417. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00297. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproducibility in Small- Treatment Research: A Tutorial Using Examples From Aphasiology.小样本治疗研究中的可重复性:以失语症为例的教程。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jun 20;66(6):1908-1927. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00333. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.一项比较针对命名障碍的分组治疗与随机治疗的随机交叉单病例系列研究。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023 Jun;33(5):821-848. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2050411. Epub 2022 Mar 14.