Suppr超能文献

双腿与单腿负重X线摄影在确定膝关节对线中的比较。

Comparison of Double and Single Leg Weight-Bearing Radiography in Determining Knee Alignment.

作者信息

Yazdanpanah Omid, Mobarakeh Mahmood Karimi, Nakhaei Masoud, Baneshi Mohammad R

机构信息

Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 May;5(3):174-180.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knee malalignment is an important modifiable cause of osteoarthritis (OA). Surgical therapeutic procedures depend on proper knee alignment assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare knee alignment parameters between double and single leg weight-bearing radiographs and to evaluate the reproducibility of inter- and intra-observer measurements.

METHODS

One hundred eight patients (59 male and 49 female) with knee deformity visited at Kerman Knee Clinic were selected. Full limb anteroposterior (AP) Radiographs were taken for each participant in double and single leg weight-bearing positions. Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKAA), Medial-Proximal-Tibial Angle (MPTA), Lateral-Distal-Femoral Angle (LDFA) and Joint-Line-Convergence Angle (JLCA) measured. Images stored on PC were examined by three observers to assess inter and intra observer reproducibility. Data analysis was done by SPSS software.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 48.4 (±6.84) years, mean BMI was 26.55 (±1.94) Kg/m2. The mean HKAA and JLCA were significantly different between double and single leg weight-bearing radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test showed high (0.99) inter-reproducibility between three observers in all cases, except one (ICC=0.92). Intra-observer reproducibility indicated a strong correlation between the observer's measurements at different times (ICC > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

HKAA and JLCA were affected by the patient's position. Observer and time interval had no effect on either of HKAA, MPTA, LDFA, and JLCA. Also the measurement of knee alignment parameters was not dependent on observer's experience. In conclusion single leg weight-bearing radiography is more representative of knee alignment and is inter and intra-observer reproducible.

摘要

背景

膝关节力线不正(膝内翻或膝外翻)是骨关节炎(OA)一个重要的可改变病因。手术治疗程序取决于正确的膝关节力线评估。本研究的目的是比较双腿和单腿负重X线片之间的膝关节力线参数,并评估观察者间和观察者内测量的可重复性。

方法

选取在克尔曼膝关节诊所就诊的108例膝关节畸形患者(59例男性和49例女性)。为每位参与者在双腿和单腿负重位拍摄全下肢前后位(AP)X线片。测量髋-膝-踝角(HKAA)、内侧近端胫骨角(MPTA)、外侧远端股骨角(LDFA)和关节线汇聚角(JLCA)。由三名观察者检查存储在个人电脑上的图像,以评估观察者间和观察者内的可重复性。采用SPSS软件进行数据分析。

结果

患者的平均年龄为48.4(±6.84)岁,平均体重指数为26.55(±1.94)kg/m²。双腿和单腿负重X线片之间的平均HKAA和JLCA有显著差异。组内相关系数(ICC)测试显示,除1例(ICC = 0.92)外,三名观察者在所有情况下的观察者间可重复性都很高(0.99)。观察者内可重复性表明观察者在不同时间的测量之间有很强的相关性(ICC > 0.99)。

结论

HKAA和JLCA受患者体位影响。观察者和时间间隔对HKAA、MPTA、LDFA和JLCA均无影响。此外,膝关节力线参数的测量不依赖于观察者的经验。总之,单腿负重X线摄影更能代表膝关节力线,且在观察者间和观察者内具有可重复性。

相似文献

10
Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee.膝内翻和膝外翻的骨形态类型。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Mar;137(3):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2626-x. Epub 2017 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

5
Automated Radiographic Measurements of Knee Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎的自动放射学测量。
Cartilage. 2023 Dec;14(4):413-423. doi: 10.1177/19476035231166126. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
8
Visual Inspection for Lower Limb Malalignment Diagnosis Is Unreliable.下肢对线不良的视诊诊断不可靠。
Cartilage. 2022 Dec;13(4):59-65. doi: 10.1177/19476035221113952. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验