Tschöpe Carsten, Van Linthout Sophie, Kherad Behrouz
Department of Cardiology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Berliner Zentrum für Regenerative Therapien (BCRT), Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):70. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0874-6.
The current definition of heart failure is mainly based on an inappropriate measure of cardiac function, i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The initial sole entity, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF <40%), was complemented by the addition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%) and most recently, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, LVEF 40-49%). Initially, HFpEF was believed to be a purely left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Pathophysiological concepts of HFpEF have changed considerably during the last years. In addition to intrinsic cardiac mechanisms, the heart failure pathogenesis is increasingly considered as driven by non-cardiac systemic processes including metabolic disorders, ischemic conditions, and pro-inflammatory/pro-fibrotic or immunological alterations. Presentation and pathophysiology of HFpEF is heterogeneous, and its management remains a challenge since evidence of therapeutic benefits is scarce. Up to now, there are no therapies improving survival in patients with HFpEF.
Several results from clinical and preclinical interventions targeting non-cardiac mechanisms or non-pharmacological interventions including new anti-diabetic or anti-inflammatory drugs, mitochondrial-targeted anti-oxidants, anti-fibrotic strategies, microRNases incl. antagomirs, cell therapeutic options, and high-density lipoprotein-raising strategies are promising and under further investigation. This review addresses mechanisms and available data of current best clinical practice and novel approaches towards HFpEF.
目前心力衰竭的定义主要基于对心脏功能的不恰当测量指标,即左心室射血分数(LVEF)。最初唯一的类型是射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF,LVEF<40%),随后补充了射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF,LVEF≥50%),最近又增加了射血分数中间范围的心力衰竭(HFmrEF,LVEF 40-49%)。最初,HFpEF被认为是单纯的左心室舒张功能障碍。在过去几年中,HFpEF的病理生理概念发生了很大变化。除了心脏内在机制外,心力衰竭的发病机制越来越多地被认为是由非心脏系统性过程驱动的,包括代谢紊乱、缺血状态以及促炎/促纤维化或免疫改变。HFpEF的临床表现和病理生理学具有异质性,由于治疗获益的证据稀少,其管理仍然是一项挑战。到目前为止,尚无改善HFpEF患者生存率的治疗方法。
针对非心脏机制的临床和临床前干预或非药物干预的多项结果,包括新型抗糖尿病或抗炎药物、线粒体靶向抗氧化剂、抗纤维化策略、包括抗miR在内的微小核糖核酸酶、细胞治疗选择以及提高高密度脂蛋白的策略,都很有前景,正在进一步研究中。本综述探讨了HFpEF当前最佳临床实践的机制和现有数据以及新方法。