Vinuela-Navarro Valldeflors, Erichsen Jonathan T, Williams Cathy, Woodhouse J Margaret
School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jul;37(4):531-541. doi: 10.1111/opo.12392.
Previous studies have reported that eye movements differ between good/average and poor readers. However, these studies have been limited to investigating eye movements during reading related tasks, and thus, the differences found could arise from deficits in higher cognitive processes involved in reading rather than oculomotor performance. The purpose of the study is to determine the extent to which eye movements in children with delayed reading skills are different to those obtained from children with good/average reading skills in non-reading related tasks.
After a screening optometric assessment, eye movement recordings were obtained from 120 children without delayed reading skills and 43 children with delayed reading skills (4 to 11 years) using a Tobii TX300 eye tracker. Cartoon characters were presented horizontally from -20° to +20° in steps of 5° to study saccades. An animated stimulus in the centre of the screen was presented for 8 seconds to study fixation stability. Saccadic main sequences, and the number and amplitude of the saccades during fixation were obtained for each participant. Children with delayed reading skills (n = 43) were unmasked after data collection was completed. Medians and quartiles were calculated for each eye movement parameter for children without (n = 120) and with (n = 43) delayed reading skills.
Independent t-tests with Bonferroni correction showed no significant differences in any of the saccadic main sequence parameters (Slope, Intercept, A, n and Q ratio) between children without and with delayed reading (p > 0.01). Similarly, no significant differences were found in the number of saccades and their amplitude during the fixation task between the two groups (p > 0.05). Further, none of the gross optometric parameters assessed (visual acuity, refractive error, ocular alignment, convergence, stereopsis and accommodation accuracy) were found to be associated with delayed reading skills (p > 0.05).
Eye movements in children with delayed reading skills are quantitatively similar to those found in children without delayed reading skills. These findings suggest that, in these children, delayed reading skills are not associated with eye movements and further question interventions targeted at improving eye movement control.
以往研究报道,阅读能力良好/中等和较差的读者之间眼球运动存在差异。然而,这些研究仅限于调查阅读相关任务期间的眼球运动,因此,所发现的差异可能源于阅读中涉及的高级认知过程缺陷,而非眼动表现。本研究的目的是确定阅读技能延迟儿童的眼球运动与阅读技能良好/中等儿童在非阅读相关任务中的眼球运动存在差异的程度。
在进行验光筛查评估后,使用Tobii TX300眼动追踪仪对120名无阅读技能延迟的儿童和43名阅读技能延迟的儿童(4至11岁)进行眼球运动记录。以5°步长从-20°至+20°水平呈现卡通人物,以研究扫视。在屏幕中心呈现一个动画刺激8秒,以研究注视稳定性。为每位参与者获取扫视主序列以及注视期间扫视的数量和幅度。在数据收集完成后,对阅读技能延迟的儿童(n = 43)进行身份识别。计算无阅读技能延迟(n = 120)和有阅读技能延迟(n = 43)儿童的每个眼球运动参数的中位数和四分位数。
采用Bonferroni校正的独立t检验显示,无阅读技能延迟和有阅读技能延迟的儿童在任何扫视主序列参数(斜率、截距、A、n和Q比率)上均无显著差异(p > 0.01)。同样,两组在注视任务期间的扫视数量及其幅度上也未发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。此外,所评估的任何总体验光参数(视力、屈光不正、眼位、集合、立体视和调节准确性)均未发现与阅读技能延迟相关(p > 0.05)。
阅读技能延迟儿童的眼球运动在数量上与无阅读技能延迟儿童的眼球运动相似。这些发现表明,对于这些儿童,阅读技能延迟与眼球运动无关,并进一步质疑旨在改善眼球运动控制的干预措施。