Jehangir Naz, Yu Caroline Yizhu, Song Jeehey, Shariati Mohammad Ali, Binder Steven, Beyer Jill, Santini Veronica, Poston Kathleen, Liao Yaping Joyce
Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0191005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191005. eCollection 2018.
Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) is characterized by degeneration of dopaminergic and other neurons, leading to motor and non-motor deficits. Abnormal eye movements in PD, including fixations, saccades, and convergence, are well described. However, saccadic reading, which requires serial and alternating saccades and fixations, is not well studied, despite its obvious impact on the quality of life. In this study, we assessed saccadic reading using variations of the King-Devick (KD) test, a rapid single digit number naming test, as a way to assess the ability to make serial left-to-right ocular motor movements necessary for reading. We recruited 42 treated PD patients and 80 age-matched controls and compared their reading times with a variety of measures, including age, duration of disease, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25), and Montreal Cognitive assessment (MoCA) test. The subjects performed 4 trials of reading 120 single digit numbers aloud as fast as possible without making errors. In each trial, they read 3 pages (KD1, KD2, and KD3), and each page contained 40 numbers per page in 8 lines with 5 numbers/line. We found that PD patients read about 20% slower than controls on all tests (KD1, 2, and 3 tests) (p < 0.02), and both groups read irregularly spaced numbers slower than regularly spaced numbers. Having lines between numbers to guide reading (KD1 tests) did not impact reading time in both PD and controls, but increased visual crowding as a result of decreased spacing between numbers (KD3 tests) was associated with significantly slower reading times in both PD and control groups. Our study revealed that saccadic reading is slower in PD, but controls and PD patients are both impacted by visuospatial planning challenges posed by increased visual crowding and irregularity of number spacing. Reading time did not correlate with UPDRS or MoCA scores in PD patients but significantly correlated with age, duration of disease, and VFQ-25 scores. The presence of convergence insufficiency did not significantly correlate with reading time in PD patients, although on average there was slower reading time in those with convergence insufficiency by 8 s (p = 0.2613). We propose that a simple reading task using 120 single-digit numbers can be used as a screening tool in the clinical setting to assess functional ocular motor difficulties in Parkinson's disease that can have a profound impact on quality of life.
特发性帕金森病(PD)的特征是多巴胺能神经元和其他神经元变性,导致运动和非运动功能缺损。PD患者的异常眼动,包括注视、扫视和集合,已有详细描述。然而,尽管扫视阅读对生活质量有明显影响,但由于其需要连续和交替的扫视与注视,目前尚未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们使用King-Devick(KD)测试的变体(一种快速的一位数数字命名测试)来评估扫视阅读,以此作为评估阅读所需的从左到右连续眼球运动能力的一种方法。我们招募了42名接受治疗的PD患者和80名年龄匹配的对照者,并将他们的阅读时间与多种指标进行比较,这些指标包括年龄、病程、统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)、美国国立眼科研究所25项视觉功能问卷25(VFQ-25)以及蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测试。受试者进行4次试验,尽可能快且无误地大声读出120个一位数数字。在每次试验中,他们阅读3页(KD1、KD2和KD3),每页包含40个数字,分8行排列,每行5个数字。我们发现,在所有测试(KD1、2和3测试)中,PD患者的阅读速度比对照者慢约20%(p < 0.02),并且两组阅读不规则间隔数字的速度都比规则间隔数字慢。数字之间有行来引导阅读(KD1测试)对PD患者和对照者的阅读时间均无影响,但由于数字间距减小导致视觉拥挤增加(KD3测试),这与PD组和对照组的阅读时间显著减慢相关。我们的研究表明,PD患者的扫视阅读较慢,但对照者和PD患者都会受到视觉拥挤增加和数字间距不规则所带来的视觉空间规划挑战的影响。PD患者的阅读时间与UPDRS或MoCA评分无关,但与年龄、病程和VFQ-25评分显著相关。集合不足的存在与PD患者的阅读时间无显著相关性,尽管平均而言,存在集合不足的患者阅读时间慢8秒(p = 0.2613)。我们建议,在临床环境中,使用120个一位数数字的简单阅读任务可作为一种筛查工具,以评估帕金森病中可能对生活质量产生深远影响的功能性眼球运动困难。