a Research Scientist , Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute , Emeryville , CA , USA.
b Senior Scientist , Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute , Emeryville , CA , USA.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2017 Sep-Oct;49(4):352-361. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2017.1342154. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Recovery housing is a service delivery modality that simultaneously addresses the social support and housing needs of those in recovery from substance use disorders. This article describes a group of recovery homes in Texas (N = 10) representing a lesser-studied type of recovery housing, one which explicitly bridges treatment and peer support by providing a variety of recovery support services. All residents meet with a recovery coach, undergo regular drug screening, and have access to intensive outpatient treatment-a program that was developed specifically to support the needs of residents in the homes. Unlike the Oxford House model and California sober living houses, which are primarily financed through resident fees, these homes are supported through a mix of resident fees as well as private and public insurance. While adhering to some aspects of the social model of recovery, none of these homes would meet criteria to be considered a true social model program, largely because residents have a limited role in the governance of the homes. Residences like the ones in this study are not well-represented in the literature and more research is needed.
康复之家是一种服务提供模式,同时满足了那些正在从药物滥用障碍中康复的人的社会支持和住房需求。本文描述了德克萨斯州的一组康复之家(N=10),它们代表了一种研究较少的康复住房类型,这种住房通过提供各种康复支持服务,明确地将治疗和同伴支持联系起来。所有居民都与康复教练会面,接受定期药物筛查,并可以接受强化门诊治疗——这是一个专门为满足这些居民需求而设立的项目。与主要通过居民费用来资助的牛津屋模式和加利福尼亚州清醒生活屋不同,这些房屋的资金来源是居民费用、私人和公共保险的混合。尽管这些房屋都遵循了康复的社会模式的某些方面,但没有一个符合被认为是真正的社会模式项目的标准,主要是因为居民在房屋的管理中作用有限。像本研究中的这些住所并没有在文献中得到很好的体现,需要进行更多的研究。