• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背景下的康复: sober living houses 与康复的生态。

Recovery in context: Sober living houses and the ecology of recovery.

机构信息

Alcohol Research Group at the Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA.

Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies at the Public Health Institute, California, USA.

出版信息

J Community Psychol. 2020 Nov;48(8):2589-2607. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22447. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1002/jcop.22447
PMID:32939779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7809921/
Abstract

Sober living houses (SLHs) are an increasingly common element of the recovery support services landscape, yet little is known about their neighborhood context. This study describes neighborhoods in which SLHs are located and examines differences by house characteristics. SLHs in Los Angeles County (N = 297) were geocoded and linked with U.S. Census, alcohol outlet, recovery resources, and accessibility data. Regression analyses tested differences by house characteristics. Co-ed houses were in neighborhoods that were less ethnically diverse and farther away from recovery resources. Larger house capacity was associated with increased density of off-premise alcohol outlets but also increased proximity to treatment. Higher fees were associated with lower neighborhood disadvantage and off-premise alcohol outlet density but the greater distance from treatment programs and other recovery resources. House characteristics are associated with neighborhood factors that both support recovery and place residents at risk.

摘要

sober living houses (SLHs) 是康复支持服务领域越来越常见的元素,但对于它们的邻里环境却知之甚少。本研究描述了 SLHs 所在的邻里环境,并考察了房屋特征的差异。洛杉矶县的 SLHs(N=297)进行了地理编码,并与美国人口普查、酒精销售点、康复资源和可达性数据进行了链接。回归分析测试了房屋特征的差异。男女同校的房屋所在的邻里环境种族多样性较少,离康复资源也较远。较大的房屋容量与非现场酒精销售点的密度增加有关,但也与治疗的接近程度有关。较高的费用与较低的邻里劣势和非现场酒精销售点密度有关,但与治疗项目和其他康复资源的距离较远。房屋特征与既支持康复又使居民面临风险的邻里因素有关。

相似文献

1
Recovery in context: Sober living houses and the ecology of recovery.背景下的康复: sober living houses 与康复的生态。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Nov;48(8):2589-2607. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22447. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Distribution and Neighborhood Correlates of Sober Living House Locations in Los Angeles.洛杉矶清醒生活之家位置的分布及其邻里关联因素
Am J Community Psychol. 2016 Sep;58(1-2):89-99. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12084. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
Do neighborhood characteristics of sober living houses impact recovery outcomes? A multilevel analysis of observational data from Los Angeles County. sober living 之家的邻里特征是否会影响康复效果?来自洛杉矶县的观测数据的多层次分析。
Health Place. 2023 Jan;79:102951. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102951. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
4
Cannabis use and alcohol and drug outcomes in a longitudinal sample of sober living house residents in California.加利福尼亚州 sober living house 居民的纵向样本中,大麻使用与酒精和药物使用后果。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Oct;165:209454. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209454. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Sober living house characteristics: A multilevel analyses of factors associated with improved outcomes. sober living house 特征:与改善结果相关因素的多层次分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Mar;98:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
6
Resident and house manager perceptions of social environments in sober living houses: Associations with length of stay.康复之家居民和管理员对社会环境的看法:与居住时间的关系。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;49(7):2959-2971. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22620. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes.戒酒戒毒康复所:18 个月的结果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38(4):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
8
Multilevel Effects of Environmental and Neighborhood Factors on Sober Living House Resident 12-Month Outcomes.环境和邻里因素对戒酒互助会居民 12 个月结果的多层次影响。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Nov;84(6):832-841. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00307. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
A clean and sober place to live: philosophy, structure, and purported therapeutic factors in sober living houses.一个干净且清醒的居住场所:戒酒康复之家的理念、结构及所谓的治疗因素。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2008 Jun;40(2):153-9. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2008.10400625.
10
A model for sober housing during outpatient treatment.门诊治疗期间的清醒生活住房模式。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2009 Jun;41(2):153-61. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2009.10399908.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Utilization of Recovery Residences among People Attending an Intensive Outpatient Program for Co-occurring Disorders.参加共病障碍强化门诊项目的人群在康复住所使用方面的差异。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2.
2
Factors Associated with Recovery Housing Availability for Individuals Involved in the Carceral System.与涉及监禁系统的个人可获得康复住房相关的因素。
J Drug Issues. 2024 Oct 10. doi: 10.1177/00220426241288728.
3
Recovery housing and on-the-ground research priorities: a scoping study through the lens of community based participatory research.

本文引用的文献

1
Beneficial effects of motivational interviewing case management: A latent class analysis of recovery capital among sober living residents with criminal justice involvement.动机性访谈个案管理的有益效果:有刑事司法涉入的清醒生活居民康复资本的潜在类别分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jul 1;200:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 May 15.
2
Enabling or Engaging? The Role of Recovery Support Services in Addiction Recovery.助力还是参与?康复支持服务在成瘾康复中的作用。
Alcohol Treat Q. 2010;28(4):391-416. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2010.511057. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
3
Sober living house characteristics: A multilevel analyses of factors associated with improved outcomes.
康复住房与实地研究重点:基于社区参与式研究视角的范围界定研究
Front Public Health. 2025 May 22;13:1554344. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1554344. eCollection 2025.
4
Whole Person Recovery from Substance Use Disorder: A Call for Research Examining a Dynamic Behavioral Ecological Model of Contexts Supportive of Recovery.物质使用障碍的全人康复:呼吁开展研究,审视支持康复的动态行为生态模型。
Addict Res Theory. 2025;33(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2024.2329580. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
5
Community characteristics and substance-free activity and service access predict membership in alcohol use disorder risk profiles.社区特征、无物质活动及服务获取情况可预测酒精使用障碍风险概况中的成员身份。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2025 May;39(3):227-237. doi: 10.1037/adb0001048. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
A qualitative investigation into the effectiveness of a housing navigator program linking justice-involved clients with recovery housing.一项关于住房导航计划有效性的定性研究,该计划将涉及司法程序的客户与康复住房联系起来。
Health Justice. 2024 Sep 14;12(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00293-6.
7
Mapping COVID vulnerability in relation to drug and alcohol recovery residence availability across the United States.绘制美国各地与毒品和酒精康复住所供应相关的 COVID 脆弱性地图。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):2266. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17048-x.
8
Multilevel Effects of Environmental and Neighborhood Factors on Sober Living House Resident 12-Month Outcomes.环境和邻里因素对戒酒互助会居民 12 个月结果的多层次影响。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Nov;84(6):832-841. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00307. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
Do neighborhood characteristics of sober living houses impact recovery outcomes? A multilevel analysis of observational data from Los Angeles County. sober living 之家的邻里特征是否会影响康复效果?来自洛杉矶县的观测数据的多层次分析。
Health Place. 2023 Jan;79:102951. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102951. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
10
Measuring Architecture in Recovery Homes: Recovery Home Architecture Scale.康复之家的测量:康复之家建筑规模量表。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(1):103-110. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2148484. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
sober living house 特征:与改善结果相关因素的多层次分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Mar;98:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
4
Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) for Persons on Probation or Parole Entering Sober Living Houses.针对缓刑或假释人员进入戒酒康复之家的动机性访谈式个案管理(MICM)
Crim Justice Behav. 2018;45(11):1634-1659. doi: 10.1177/0093854818784099. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
5
Recovery Housing: Evolving Models to Address Resident Needs.康复之家:不断演变的模式以满足居民需求。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2017 Sep-Oct;49(4):352-361. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2017.1342154. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Remission from substance use disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.物质使用障碍的缓解:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Nov 1;168:293-306. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.625. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outpatient Substance Use Disorder Treatment Episode Completion for Different Substances.不同物质门诊物质使用障碍治疗疗程完成情况中的种族和族裔差异
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Apr;63:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
Relating off-premises alcohol outlet density to intentional and unintentional injuries.将店外酒精销售点密度与故意伤害和意外伤害联系起来。
Addiction. 2016 Jan;111(1):56-64. doi: 10.1111/add.13098. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
A critical component of the continuum of care for substance use disorders: recovery homes in Philadelphia.物质使用障碍连续护理的一个关键组成部分:费城的康复之家。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2015 Jan-Mar;47(1):80-90. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2014.976726.
10
Elements that define recovery: the experiential perspective.定义康复的要素:体验视角。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Nov;75(6):999-1010. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.999.