Suppr超能文献

长期机械通气患者接受姑息治疗和撤机的决定因素。

Determinants of Receiving Palliative Care and Ventilator Withdrawal Among Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.

作者信息

Chen Yang-Ching, Fan Hsien-Yu, Curtis J Randall, Lee Oscar Kuang-Sheng, Liu Chih-Kuang, Huang Sheng-Jean

机构信息

1Department of Family Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, ZhongXing Branch, Taipei, Taiwan. 2School of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 4Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 5Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 6Department of Medicine and Graduate Institute of Business Administration, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan. 7Surgical Department, Medical College, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):1625-1634. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002569.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Increasing numbers of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation generates a tremendous strain on healthcare systems. Patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation suffer from long-term poor quality of life. However, no study has ever explored the willingness to receive palliative care or terminal withdrawal and the factors influencing willingness.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Five different hospitals of Taipei City Hospital system.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with ventilatory support for more than 60 days.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified the family members of 145 consecutive patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation in five hospitals of Taipei City Hospital system and enrolled family members for 106 patients (73.1%). We collected information from patient families' regarding concepts (knowledge, attitude, and experiences) of palliative care, caregiver burden, family function, patient quality of life, and physician-family communications. From the medical record, we obtained duration of hospitalization, consciousness level, disease severity, medical cost, and the presence of do-not-resuscitate orders. The vast majority of family members agreed with the concept of palliative care (90.4%) with 17.3% of the family members agreeing to ventilator withdrawal currently and 67.5% terminally in anticipation of death. Approximately half of the family members regretted having chosen prolonged mechanical ventilation (56.7%). Reduced patient quality of life and increased family understanding of palliative care significantly associated with increased caregiver willingness to endorse palliative care and withdraw life-sustaining agents in anticipation of death. Longer duration of ventilator usage and hospitalization was associated with increased feelings of regret about choosing prolonged mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

During prolonged mechanical ventilation, physicians should thoroughly discuss its benefits and burdens. Families should be given the opportunity to discuss the circumstances under which they might request the implementation of palliative care or withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in order to avoid prolonging the dying process.

摘要

目的

接受长期机械通气的患者数量不断增加,给医疗系统带来了巨大压力。长期机械通气的患者长期生活质量较差。然而,尚无研究探讨过患者接受姑息治疗或临终撤机的意愿以及影响意愿的因素。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

台北市立医院系统的五家不同医院。

患者

接受通气支持超过60天的成年患者。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

我们确定了台北市立医院系统五家医院中145例连续接受长期机械通气患者的家属,并纳入了106例患者的家属(73.1%)。我们从患者家属那里收集了有关姑息治疗的概念(知识、态度和经验)、照顾者负担、家庭功能、患者生活质量以及医生与家属沟通方面的信息。从病历中,我们获取了住院时间、意识水平、疾病严重程度、医疗费用以及是否有不进行心肺复苏的医嘱。绝大多数家属认同姑息治疗的概念(90.4%),其中17.3%的家属目前同意撤机,67.5%的家属在预期患者死亡时同意临终撤机。大约一半的家属后悔选择了长期机械通气(56.7%)。患者生活质量下降以及家属对姑息治疗的理解增加,与照顾者更愿意认可姑息治疗并在预期患者死亡时撤掉维持生命的措施显著相关。机械通气和住院时间越长,对选择长期机械通气的后悔感越强。

结论

在长期机械通气期间,医生应充分讨论其益处和负担。应给予家属机会,讨论他们可能要求实施姑息治疗或撤掉机械通气的情况,以避免延长临终过程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验