• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在慢性呼吸机病房中选择性停止维持生命的机械通气。

Elective discontinuation of life-sustaining mechanical ventilation on a chronic ventilator unit.

作者信息

Ankrom M, Zelesnick L, Barofsky I, Georas S, Finucane T E, Greenough W B

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Nov;49(11):1549-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911252.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911252.x
PMID:11890598
Abstract

Withdrawal of medical interventions has become common in the hospital for patients with terminal disease. Despite the widespread feeling that medical interventions may be futile in certain patients, many patients, families, and medical staff find withdrawal of care difficult and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation to be the most disturbing secondary to the close proximity of withdrawal and death. Presented is a 6-year retrospective review of elective withdrawal of life-sustaining mechanical ventilation on a chronic ventilator unit (CVU) in an academic nursing home. Of the 98 patients admitted to the 19-bed CVU during this period, only 13 underwent terminal weaning (TW). Statistically, these 13 patients did not differ significantly in age, gender, race, route of nutrition, decisional capacity, or length of stay on the unit compared with the 85 patients who were not terminally weaned (t-test P > .05). Stepwise logistic regression found that patients who were more alert at admission were more likely to have participated in TW (chi2 = 5.22, coefficient for alertness P < .036). The decision to terminate mechanical ventilation was made by patients in eight cases and by family in five cases. The first step in the process leading to TW was a discussion with the patient and family about plan of care, including the patient's desires for attempted resuscitation, rehospitalization, advance directives, and family contacts. Plan of care was reviewed informally in a weekly multidisciplinary round and formally, to address each patient's care plan, in a multidisciplinary family meeting on a regular basis. The second step was to address TW when brought up by the patient, family, or medical staff. A request for TW by a patient or surrogate was referred to the medical staff, who screened the patient for depression or other remediable symptoms. The third step was to refer the patient and family to another formal meeting to discuss the request for TW and, if needed, in the case of multiple family members, to allow questions to be answered and consensus to be formed. Additional meetings were scheduled as needed. The next step occurred once a consensus was reached to proceed with TW; a date and time was set to reconvene the patient, family, and anyone else who wanted to be present at the TW. The TW process began when a peripheral intravenous catheter was placed and the patient was premedicated with low doses of morphine sulfate and a benzodiazepine. After premedication, the patient was removed from the ventilator. The physician, nurse, family, and physician assistant remained at the bedside and additional morphine or benzodiazepine was given, as needed, for symptom management. Death from TW occurred in all patients, at times ranging from 2 minutes to 10.5 hours (average 6.2 hours). A mean total dose of 115 mg morphine and 14 mg diazepam was given for symptom control. There was no correlation between dose of these medications and duration of survival off the ventilator.

摘要

对于晚期疾病患者,在医院撤回医疗干预措施已变得很常见。尽管人们普遍认为在某些患者中医疗干预可能是徒劳的,但许多患者、家属和医护人员发现停止治疗很困难,而撤掉机械通气是最令人不安的,因为撤机与死亡时间很接近。本文呈现了对一所学术性疗养院慢性呼吸机病房(CVU)中择期撤掉维持生命的机械通气的6年回顾性研究。在此期间,98名患者入住了这个有19张床位的CVU,只有13名患者接受了终末期撤机(TW)。从统计学上看,与85名未接受终末期撤机的患者相比,这13名患者在年龄、性别、种族、营养途径、决策能力或在该病房的住院时间上没有显著差异(t检验P>.05)。逐步逻辑回归分析发现,入院时更清醒的患者更有可能参与终末期撤机(卡方=5.22,清醒程度系数P<.036)。终止机械通气的决定在8例中由患者做出,5例由家属做出。导致终末期撤机过程的第一步是与患者及家属讨论护理计划,包括患者对尝试复苏、再次住院、预先指示和家属联系人的意愿。护理计划在每周的多学科查房中进行非正式审查,并在定期的多学科家庭会议上正式审查,以处理每位患者的护理计划。第二步是当患者、家属或医护人员提出终末期撤机时进行处理。患者或代理人提出的终末期撤机请求会提交给医护人员,医护人员会对患者进行抑郁症或其他可治疗症状的筛查。第三步是将患者和家属转介到另一次正式会议,讨论终末期撤机请求,如有必要,对于有多名家庭成员的情况,允许回答问题并达成共识。根据需要安排额外的会议。下一步是在达成继续进行终末期撤机的共识后进行;确定一个日期和时间,重新召集患者、家属以及任何想在终末期撤机时在场的人。当置入外周静脉导管并给患者预先使用低剂量硫酸吗啡和苯二氮䓬类药物后,终末期撤机过程开始。预先用药后,将患者从呼吸机上撤下。医生、护士、家属和医师助理留在床边,根据需要给予额外的吗啡或苯二氮䓬类药物以进行症状管理。所有患者均因终末期撤机死亡,时间从2分钟到10.5小时不等(平均6.2小时)。为控制症状平均总共给予了115毫克吗啡和14毫克地西泮。这些药物的剂量与撤机后的生存时间之间没有相关性。

相似文献

1
Elective discontinuation of life-sustaining mechanical ventilation on a chronic ventilator unit.在慢性呼吸机病房中选择性停止维持生命的机械通气。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Nov;49(11):1549-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911252.x.
2
Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房中,因预期患者死亡而撤机。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 18;349(12):1123-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030083.
3
[Withdrawing respiratory support in patients in intensive care].[在重症监护患者中撤除呼吸支持]
Cas Lek Cesk. 2003;142(7):398-402; discussion 402-3.
4
Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospital: an empirical study.大学医院中放弃维持生命治疗的过程:一项实证研究。
Crit Care Med. 1992 May;20(5):570-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199205000-00005.
5
Determinants of Receiving Palliative Care and Ventilator Withdrawal Among Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.长期机械通气患者接受姑息治疗和撤机的决定因素。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):1625-1634. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002569.
6
Comparison of terminal extubation and terminal weaning as mechanical ventilation withdrawal in ICU patients.比较 ICU 患者机械通气撤机中终末拔管与终末脱机。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Apr;83(4):375-382. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11468-3. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation: ethical principles and guidelines for terminal weaning.机械通气的撤离:终末期撤机的伦理原则与指南
Am J Crit Care. 1993 May;2(3):217-23.
8
Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of terminally ill patients undergoing withdrawal of mechanical ventilation.终末期患者行机械通气撤机的临床特征和生存结局。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Sep;117(9):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
Evaluation of a standardized order form for the withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房生命支持撤除标准化医嘱单的评估
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1141-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000125509.34805.0c.
10
Life-Sustaining Treatment Status at the Time of Death in a Japanese Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.日本儿科重症监护病房死亡时的生命维持治疗状态
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 May;35(5):767-771. doi: 10.1177/1049909117743474. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Care of the Patient Nearing the End of Life in the Neurointensive Care Unit.神经重症监护病房临近生命终末期患者的护理。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec;41(3):749-759. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02064-5. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Long-term mechanical ventilation and transitions in care: A narrative review.长期机械通气与护理的转变:叙事性综述。
Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231176301. doi: 10.1177/14799731231176301.
3
End-of-Life Decisions of Intracranial Hemorrhage Patients Successfully Weaned From Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.
成功撤机延长机械通气颅内出血患者的临终决策。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Nov;39(11):1342-1349. doi: 10.1177/10499091221074636. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Incidence and Risk Model Development for Severe Tachypnea Following Terminal Extubation.终端拔管后严重呼吸急促的发生率和风险模型建立。
Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1456-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Existential decision-making in a fatal progressive disease: how much do legal and medical frameworks matter?致命性进行性疾病中的存在主义决策:法律和医疗框架的重要性有多大?
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 28;16(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0252-6.
6
Deciding in the dark: advance directives and continuation of treatment in chronic critical illness.在黑暗中做决定:慢性危重病中的预立医疗指示与治疗延续
Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):919-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819613ce.
7
[Elective termination of respiratory therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis].[肌萎缩侧索硬化症中呼吸治疗的选择性终止]
Nervenarzt. 2008 Jun;79(6):684-90. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2439-9.