• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用多种统计信息从 EEG 数据中同时去除眼动和肌肉伪影。

Simultaneous ocular and muscle artifact removal from EEG data by exploiting diverse statistics.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, China.

Department of Microelectronics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2017 Sep 1;88:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.06.013
PMID:28658649
Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings are frequently contaminated by both ocular and muscle artifacts. These are normally dealt with separately, by employing blind source separation (BSS) techniques relying on either second-order or higher-order statistics (SOS & HOS respectively). When HOS-based methods are used, it is usually in the setting of assuming artifacts are statistically independent to the EEG. When SOS-based methods are used, it is assumed that artifacts have autocorrelation characteristics distinct from the EEG. In reality, ocular and muscle artifacts do not completely follow the assumptions of strict temporal independence to the EEG nor completely unique autocorrelation characteristics, suggesting that exploiting HOS or SOS alone may be insufficient to remove these artifacts. Here we employ a novel BSS technique, independent vector analysis (IVA), to jointly employ HOS and SOS simultaneously to remove ocular and muscle artifacts. Numerical simulations and application to real EEG recordings were used to explore the utility of the IVA approach. IVA was superior in isolating both ocular and muscle artifacts, especially for raw EEG data with low signal-to-noise ratio, and also integrated usually separate SOS and HOS steps into a single unified step.

摘要

脑电图(EEG)记录经常受到眼动和肌肉伪迹的干扰。这些通常通过使用基于二阶或更高阶统计量(SOS 和 HOS 分别)的盲源分离(BSS)技术分别处理。当使用基于 HOS 的方法时,通常假设伪迹与 EEG 在统计上是独立的。当使用基于 SOS 的方法时,假设伪迹具有与 EEG 不同的自相关特征。实际上,眼动和肌肉伪迹并不完全遵循与 EEG 严格时间独立的假设,也不完全具有独特的自相关特征,这表明单独利用 HOS 或 SOS 可能不足以去除这些伪迹。在这里,我们采用一种新的 BSS 技术,独立向量分析(IVA),同时利用 HOS 和 SOS 来去除眼动和肌肉伪迹。数值模拟和对真实 EEG 记录的应用用于探索 IVA 方法的实用性。IVA 在分离眼动和肌肉伪迹方面表现出色,尤其是对于信噪比低的原始 EEG 数据,并且还将通常分开的 SOS 和 HOS 步骤集成到单个统一步骤中。

相似文献

1
Simultaneous ocular and muscle artifact removal from EEG data by exploiting diverse statistics.利用多种统计信息从 EEG 数据中同时去除眼动和肌肉伪影。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Sep 1;88:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
2
A comparative study of automatic techniques for ocular artifact reduction in spontaneous EEG signals based on clinical target variables: a simulation case.基于临床目标变量的自发脑电图信号中眼动伪迹减少自动技术的比较研究:一个模拟案例。
Comput Biol Med. 2008 Mar;38(3):348-60. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.12.001. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
3
Removing muscle and eye artifacts using blind source separation techniques in ictal EEG source imaging.在发作期脑电图源成像中使用盲源分离技术去除肌肉和眼部伪迹。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;120(7):1262-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
4
A robust adaptive denoising framework for real-time artifact removal in scalp EEG measurements.一种用于头皮脑电图测量中实时去除伪迹的强大自适应去噪框架。
J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr;13(2):026013. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026013. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
5
Removing muscle artifacts from EEG data of people with cognitive impairment using high order statistic methods.使用高阶统计方法从认知障碍患者的脑电图数据中去除肌肉伪迹。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22 Suppl:165-173.
6
On the blind source separation of human electroencephalogram by approximate joint diagonalization of second order statistics.基于二阶统计量近似联合对角化的脑电信号盲源分离方法
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;119(12):2677-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
7
[Eliminating artifacts of EEG data based on independent component analysis].基于独立成分分析的脑电图数据伪迹消除
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Sep;20(3):479-83.
8
Improving the interpretation of ictal scalp EEG: BSS-CCA algorithm for muscle artifact removal.改善发作期头皮脑电图的解读:用于去除肌肉伪迹的BSS-CCA算法
Epilepsia. 2007 May;48(5):950-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01031.x. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
9
A multi-step blind source separation approach for the attenuation of artifacts in mobile high-density electroencephalography data.一种用于减轻移动高密度脑电图数据中伪影的多步盲源分离方法。
J Neural Eng. 2021 Dec 28;18(6). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac4084.
10
Surrogate-Based Artifact Removal From Single-Channel EEG.基于代理的单通道 EEG 伪迹去除。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Mar;26(3):540-550. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2794184.

引用本文的文献

1
EEG artifact removal using sub-space decomposition, nonlinear dynamics, stationary wavelet transform and machine learning algorithms.使用子空间分解、非线性动力学、平稳小波变换和机器学习算法去除脑电图伪迹
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 24;13:910368. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.910368. eCollection 2022.
2
Remove Artifacts from a Single-Channel EEG Based on VMD and SOBI.基于 VMD 和 SOBI 去除单通道 EEG 中的伪迹。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 4;22(17):6698. doi: 10.3390/s22176698.
3
Backward Walking Induces Significantly Larger Upper-Mu-Rhythm Suppression Effects Than Forward Walking Does.
倒走比正走引起的大脑上中央区 Mu 节律抑制效应更大。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;20(24):7250. doi: 10.3390/s20247250.
4
Current Status, Challenges, and Possible Solutions of EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface: A Comprehensive Review.基于脑电图的脑机接口的现状、挑战及可能的解决方案:综述
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Jun 3;14:25. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00025. eCollection 2020.
5
An Unsupervised Method for Artefact Removal in EEG Signals.一种 EEG 信号伪迹去除的无监督方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 18;19(10):2302. doi: 10.3390/s19102302.
6
Removal of Artifacts from EEG Signals: A Review.脑电信号去伪迹:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 26;19(5):987. doi: 10.3390/s19050987.
7
Combining EEG signal processing with supervised methods for Alzheimer's patients classification.将 EEG 信号处理与监督方法相结合,对阿尔茨海默病患者进行分类。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 May 31;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0613-y.