Medical Biology Section, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Innate Immun. 2017;9(6):546-560. doi: 10.1159/000477211. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
Sepsis is a severe systemic inflammatory response to infection. Endothelial activation and dysfunction play a critical role in the pathophysiology of sepsis and represent an important therapeutic target to reduce sepsis mortality. Interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) was recently identified as a downstream target of TNF-α-mediated signal transduction in endothelial cells. The aim of this study was to explore the importance of IRF-1 as a regulator of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced endothelial proinflammatory activation. We found that renal IRF-1 was upregulated by LPS in vivo as well as in LPS-stimulated endothelial cells in vitro. Furthermore, we identified intracellular retinoic acid inducible gene-I (RIG-I) as a regulator of LPS-mediated IRF-1 induction. IRF-1 depletion specifically resulted in diminished induction of VCAM-1 in response to LPS, but not of E-selectin or ICAM-1, which was independent of NFκB signaling. When both IRF-1 and the RIG-I adapter protein mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) were absent, VCAM-1 induction was not additionally inhibited, suggesting that MAVS and IRF-1 reside in the same signaling pathway. Surprisingly, E-selectin and IL-6 induction were no longer inhibited by MAVS knockdown when IRF-1 was also absent, revealing a redundant endothelial activation pathway. In summary, we report an IRF-1-mediated proinflammatory signaling pathway that specifically regulates LPS-mediated VCAM-1 expression, independent of NFκB.
败血症是一种严重的全身炎症反应性感染。内皮细胞激活和功能障碍在败血症的病理生理学中起着关键作用,是降低败血症死亡率的重要治疗靶点。干扰素调节因子 1(IRF-1)最近被确定为内皮细胞中 TNF-α 介导的信号转导的下游靶标。本研究旨在探讨 IRF-1 作为调节脂多糖(LPS)诱导的内皮前炎性激活的重要性。我们发现,LPS 在体内以及在 LPS 刺激的内皮细胞中均可上调肾 IRF-1。此外,我们确定细胞内视黄酸诱导基因-I(RIG-I)是 LPS 介导的 IRF-1 诱导的调节剂。IRF-1 耗竭特异性导致 LPS 诱导的 VCAM-1 诱导减少,但不影响 E-选择素或 ICAM-1,这与 NFκB 信号无关。当 IRF-1 和 RIG-I 衔接蛋白线粒体抗病毒信号(MAVS)都不存在时,VCAM-1 的诱导不会被进一步抑制,这表明 MAVS 和 IRF-1 位于相同的信号通路中。令人惊讶的是,当 IRF-1 也不存在时,MAVS 敲低不再抑制 E-选择素和 IL-6 的诱导,这表明存在一个冗余的内皮激活途径。总之,我们报告了一个由 IRF-1 介导的促炎信号通路,该通路可特异性调节 LPS 介导的 VCAM-1 表达,与 NFκB 无关。