Suppr超能文献

卧位姿势对健康年轻受试者动态肺功能参数的影响。

Effect of Recumbent Body Positions on Dynamic Lung Function Parameters in Healthy Young Subjects.

作者信息

Pal Arvind Kumar, Tiwari Sunita, Verma Dileep Kumar

机构信息

Junior Resident, Department of Physiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Professor, Department of Physiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):CC08-CC10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25202.9828. Epub 2017 May 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The change in body position can alter pulmonary functions parameters, therefore it is important to understand the physiological basis of these alteration. Ideally, spirometry is done in sitting position until the subject is unable to do so. Hospitalized patients often assume recumbent body positions irrespective of underlying pathology. Hence, need arises to find out best recumbent body positions for the benefit of these patients to make breathing comfortable for them.

AIM

The aim of this study was to find out whether the change from the supine position to crook lying and Fowler's position (45° dorsal elevation) causes change in spirometric parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present work was carried out at Department of Physiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow. A total 131 apparently healthy individuals were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Lung function was assessed using a PC-based spirometer according to American Thoracic Society guideline in the supine, crook lying and Fowler's position (45° dorsal elevation).

RESULTS

The study consisted of 131 subjects (male 66%, female 34%), with mean age of 20.15±2.71 years and BMI 21.20±3.28 Kg/m. Repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni test was used to compare the mean values between each body position. Compared with the other two positions, Fowler's position showed significantly (p<0.05) higher values for FVC, FEV, PEF, FEF.

CONCLUSION

Recumbent body position influences spirometric parameters in young healthy subjects. We demonstrated that spirometric values are higher in the Fowler's position than in the supine or crook lying position. The results of this study will help in the selection of the best alternative position for the spirometry in bed ridden patients.

摘要

引言

身体姿势的改变会改变肺功能参数,因此了解这些改变的生理基础很重要。理想情况下,肺活量测定应在坐姿下进行,直到受试者无法保持该姿势。住院患者通常无论潜在病情如何都会采取卧位。因此,有必要找出对这些患者有益的最佳卧位,以使他们呼吸舒适。

目的

本研究的目的是确定从仰卧位变为屈膝卧位和福勒氏位(背部抬高45°)是否会导致肺活量测定参数发生变化。

材料与方法

本研究在勒克瑙乔治国王医科大学的生理学系进行。共有131名看似健康的个体参与了这项横断面研究。根据美国胸科学会指南,使用基于电脑的肺活量计在仰卧位、屈膝卧位和福勒氏位(背部抬高45°)评估肺功能。

结果

该研究包括131名受试者(男性占66%,女性占34%),平均年龄为20.15±2.71岁,体重指数为21.20±3.28kg/m²。采用重复测量方差分析及事后邦费罗尼检验来比较每个体位之间的平均值。与其他两个体位相比,福勒氏位的用力肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)、呼气峰值流速(PEF)、用力呼气流量(FEF)值显著更高(p<0.05)。

结论

卧位会影响年轻健康受试者的肺活量测定参数。我们证明,福勒氏位的肺活量测定值高于仰卧位或屈膝卧位。本研究结果将有助于为卧床患者选择肺活量测定的最佳替代体位。

相似文献

1
Effect of Recumbent Body Positions on Dynamic Lung Function Parameters in Healthy Young Subjects.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):CC08-CC10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25202.9828. Epub 2017 May 1.
2
Differences in blood pressure by body position (supine, Fowler's, and sitting) in hypertensive subjects.
Am J Hypertens. 2011 Oct;24(10):1073-9. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.106. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
The effect of body position on pulmonary function: a systematic review.
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0723-4.
8
A Comparative Study of 2-Hour Interface Pressure in Different Angles of Laterally Inclined, Supine, and Fowler's Position.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 23;18(19):9992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18199992.
10
Effect of Different Positions on FVC and FEV1 Measurements of Asthmatic Patients.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Apr;26(4):591-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.591. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
[Influence of different body positions in vital capacity in patients on postoperative upper abdominal].
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):217-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
2
Effect of Different Positions on FVC and FEV1 Measurements of Asthmatic Patients.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Apr;26(4):591-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.591. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
5
Peak expiratory flow in bed? A comparison of 3 positions.
Respir Care. 2013 Mar;58(3):494-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01843.
7
Standardisation of spirometry.
Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.
8
[Spirometric values of obese and non-obese subjects on orthostatic, sitting and supine positions].
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2004 Apr-Jun;50(2):142-7. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302004000200028. Epub 2004 Jul 21.
9
Spirometric reference values in a large Middle Eastern population.
Eur Respir J. 2003 Sep;22(3):529-34. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00003603.
10
Spirometric values in obese individuals. Effects of body position.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Sep;156(3 Pt 1):998-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.3.9609089.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验