Yashwant Aniruddh V, Dilip S, Krishnaraj R, Ravi K
Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College Campus, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry, India.
Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):ZC17-ZC20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25774.9808. Epub 2017 May 1.
Mini implants form a valuable source for absolute anchorage thereby helping in achieving ideal treatment outcome. Stability of the mini implant is one of the important factors affecting the success of mini implants. Thread shape is a critical factor in the engineering design of mini implant, which affects the primary stability.
To evaluate the effects of thread shape on the pull out strength of mini implants.
Mini implants of five different designs in thread shape (reverse buttress, buttress, 75° joint profile with flutes, trapezoidal and trapezoidal fluted) were used with 10 screws in each group. The mini implants were loaded on to the polyurethane foam block (Sawbones pacific research lab, USA) perpendicular to the surface and the pull out strength was tested using the Instrom testing machine. The control group consisted of mini implants with reverse buttress thread shape. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to compare the pull out strength of the mini implants within as well as between the different groups.
The mean in the pull out tests ranged from 13.45 N (trapezoidal) to 61 N (trapezoidal fluted). The tukey post-hoc tests showed a statistically significant difference of 34.5 N between the control group and the trapezoidal fluted group. The level of statistical significance showed p< 0.05.
Trapezoidal fluted mini implants showed the highest pull out strength when compared to mini implants with other thread designs used in this study. Further studies with the use of Finite Element Method (FEM) and foam blocks of higher density would be required to evaluate the performance of this new thread design.
微型种植体是绝对支抗的重要来源,有助于实现理想的治疗效果。微型种植体的稳定性是影响其成功的重要因素之一。螺纹形状是微型种植体工程设计中的关键因素,会影响初期稳定性。
评估螺纹形状对微型种植体拔出力的影响。
使用五种不同螺纹形状设计的微型种植体(反牙合支抗、牙合支抗、带凹槽的75°联合轮廓、梯形和梯形带凹槽),每组10颗螺钉。将微型种植体垂直于表面加载到聚氨酯泡沫块(美国Sawbones太平洋研究实验室)上,并用Instron测试机测试拔出力。对照组由反牙合支抗螺纹形状的微型种植体组成。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验比较不同组内及不同组间微型种植体的拔出力。
拔出试验的平均值范围为13.45 N(梯形)至61 N(梯形带凹槽)。Tukey事后检验显示,对照组与梯形带凹槽组之间的统计学显著差异为34.5 N。统计学显著性水平显示p<0.05。
与本研究中使用的其他螺纹设计的微型种植体相比,梯形带凹槽微型种植体的拔出力最高。需要进一步使用有限元方法(FEM)和更高密度的泡沫块进行研究,以评估这种新螺纹设计的性能。