Mcharo Solomon Kasha
University of Saskatchewan.
J Holist Nurs. 2018 Sep;36(3):282-290. doi: 10.1177/0898010117716854. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Spiritual care has been recognized as an integral component to holistic health care promotion. Several middle-range theories in the recent years have been developed in an attempt to promote spiritual care in nursing practice and to guide research in spiritual nursing. However, there is still reluctance from nurses in addressing spiritual care needs for their patients. Fear of intrusion and a lack of technical know-how are among the reasons for this dilemma. The development of the T.R.U.S.T. Model for Inclusive Spiritual Care is to provide caregivers with a relevant, nonintrusive mode of care in their approach to spiritual nursing practice. The T.R.U.S.T. model provides guidelines to help address and accommodate different spiritual worldviews with the aim of promoting optimum healing. The following article is a critique of the T.R.U.S.T. Model for Inclusive Spiritual Care using Fawcett's criteria for evaluation.
精神护理已被视为促进整体医疗保健的一个不可或缺的组成部分。近年来，人们发展了几种中层理论，试图在护理实践中促进精神护理，并指导精神护理方面的研究。然而，护士们在满足患者的精神护理需求方面仍然存在抵触情绪。害怕侵犯患者隐私以及缺乏专业技能是造成这一困境的部分原因。包容性精神护理的信任模式（T.R.U.S.T.模式）的发展旨在为护理人员在精神护理实践中提供一种相关的、非侵入性的护理方式。T.R.U.S.T.模式提供了指导方针，以帮助应对和适应不同的精神世界观，旨在促进最佳康复。以下文章是使用福西特的评估标准对包容性精神护理的信任模式（T.R.U.S.T.模式）进行的批判。
