Suppr超能文献

乳腺体格检查中不同技术的验证

Validation of Different Techniques in Physical Examination of Breast.

作者信息

Sultania Mahesh, Kataria Kamal, Srivastava Anurag, Misra Mahesh Chandra, Parshad Rajinder, Dhar Anita, Hari Smriti, Thulkar Sanjay

机构信息

Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg. 2017 Jun;79(3):219-225. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1470-5. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

Abstract

The majority of patients attending breast clinics are found to be suffering from benign conditions. The detailed investigations of every patient would add to the cost of care and burden the laboratories. A detailed clinical evaluation might limit the use of thorough investigations for suspicious lesions only. This cross sectional study involved the patients with various benign and malignant conditions of breast, who attended outpatient clinic and surgical ward at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi from June 2009 to May 2011. The study started with a training of the resident (observer 2) in various breast examination techniques by a professor of surgery (observer 1), who was well trained in the discipline of breast surgery by internationally renowned breast experts. The different techniques of breast examination were validated after calculation of intra and inter-observer variation. Excellent agreement was observed between both the observers. The diagnostic accuracy ratio for most variables ranges from 0.9 to 1. The dimpling of skin on inspection had a low kappa (coefficient of agreement = 0.48) and consistency of lymph node on palpation had a kappa 0.38. All other variables showed high agreement. The present study was successful in training the resident and validating the different techniques in physical examination of breast.

摘要

到乳腺门诊就诊的大多数患者被发现患有良性疾病。对每位患者进行详细检查会增加护理成本并给实验室带来负担。详细的临床评估可能会将全面检查仅局限于对可疑病变的检查。这项横断面研究纳入了2009年6月至2011年5月在新德里全印度医学科学研究所门诊和外科病房就诊的患有各种乳腺良性和恶性疾病的患者。该研究首先由一位外科教授(观察者1)对住院医师(观察者2)进行各种乳腺检查技术的培训,这位教授曾受到国际知名乳腺专家在乳腺外科领域的良好培训。在计算观察者内和观察者间差异后,对不同的乳腺检查技术进行了验证。两位观察者之间观察到了极好的一致性。大多数变量的诊断准确率在0.9至1之间。检查时皮肤出现酒窝征的kappa值较低(一致性系数=0.48),触诊时淋巴结的一致性kappa值为0.38。所有其他变量显示出高度一致性。本研究成功地培训了住院医师并验证了乳腺体格检查的不同技术。

相似文献

1
Validation of Different Techniques in Physical Examination of Breast.乳腺体格检查中不同技术的验证
Indian J Surg. 2017 Jun;79(3):219-225. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1470-5. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
5
Triple assessment of breast lump.乳腺肿块的三联评估
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Sep;17(9):535-8.
6
Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.延时注释的组内和组间变异性。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Dec;28(12):3215-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det366. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Clinical breast examination.临床乳房检查。
West J Med. 1996 Apr;164(4):355-8.
6
Breast cancer: getting the diagnosis right.乳腺癌:正确诊断
Med J Aust. 1995 Nov 6;163(9):494-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124701.x.
9
Increased proficiency of search in breast self-examination.乳房自我检查中搜索能力的提高。
Cancer. 1986 Dec 1;58(11):2531-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861201)58:11<2531::aid-cncr2820581128>3.0.co;2-j.
10
Physician breast examination and breast self-examination.医生乳房检查和乳房自我检查。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Dec;32(4):761-7. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198912000-00019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验