Zoromba Mohamed Ali, Selim Abeer, Ibrahim Ateya Megahed, Elsehrawy Mohamed Gamal, Alkubati Sameer A, Abousoliman Ali D, El-Gazar Heba Emad
College of Nursing, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Egypt.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 16;10(16):e36257. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36257. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
Trauma is commonly understood as a psychological and emotional response to distressing events. The subjective nature of trauma experiences has led to ongoing debates about the best theoretical frameworks for understanding and addressing trauma. This review aims to comprehensively critique traditional biomedical and psychological models and advocates for more inclusive and culturally sensitive frameworks.
A narrative literature review was conducted, synthesizing data from 96 peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and authoritative reports from databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. The review focused on studies related to trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex trauma, and related disorders, emphasizing both individual and socio-cultural aspects.
The review identifies several key criticisms of trauma models. For biological models, critiques include the oversimplification of trauma experiences, insufficient developmental considerations, failure to capture diverse trauma responses, limited cultural sensitivity, and inadequacy of the categorical approach. For psychological models, criticisms encompass an overemphasis on internal processes, neglect of developmental impacts, limited focus on symptom diversity, challenges in addressing socio-cultural contexts, and incomplete integration of emotional and relational aspects. These findings underscore the need for more comprehensive, culturally sensitive, and developmentally informed trauma frameworks.
The findings emphasize the importance of adopting a holistic perspective in trauma research and treatment. By integrating individual, interpersonal, and socio-cultural dimensions, future research and interventions can better support trauma survivors. This approach necessitates ongoing interdisciplinary collaboration and the inclusion of diverse voices, including those of trauma survivors, to refine current methodologies and enhance therapeutic outcomes.
创伤通常被理解为对令人痛苦事件的心理和情绪反应。创伤经历的主观性引发了关于理解和应对创伤的最佳理论框架的持续争论。本综述旨在全面批判传统的生物医学和心理学模型,并倡导采用更具包容性和文化敏感性的框架。
进行了一项叙述性文献综述,综合了来自96篇同行评审期刊文章、书籍以及来自PubMed、PsycINFO和谷歌学术等数据库的权威报告的数据。该综述侧重于与创伤、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、复杂性创伤及相关障碍相关的研究,同时强调个体和社会文化方面。
该综述确定了对创伤模型的若干关键批评。对于生物模型,批评包括对创伤经历的过度简化、对发展因素的考虑不足、未能捕捉到多样的创伤反应、文化敏感性有限以及分类方法的不足。对于心理模型,批评包括过度强调内部过程、忽视发展影响、对症状多样性的关注有限、在应对社会文化背景方面存在挑战以及情感和关系方面的整合不完整。这些发现强调了需要更全面、具有文化敏感性且考虑发展因素的创伤框架。
研究结果强调了在创伤研究和治疗中采用整体视角的重要性。通过整合个体、人际和社会文化维度,未来的研究和干预措施可以更好地支持创伤幸存者。这种方法需要持续的跨学科合作,并纳入包括创伤幸存者在内的各种不同声音,以完善当前的方法并提高治疗效果。