Sacco Emilio, Bientinesi Riccardo, Gandi Carlo, Palermo Giuseppe, Pierconti Francesco, Bassi Pierfrancesco
"Agostino Gemelli" Universitary Hospital Foundation, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):485-495. doi: 10.1002/nau.23335. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
To objectively assess and enhance the appropriateness of continence products provision to sufferers from urinary incontinence (UI) managed with containment strategies.
Incontinent patients of five Italian continence care services were included in this industry-supported study from 01/2012 to 03/2016. All patients/carers have been invited to perform a 48-h home-based pad test and to fill in a diary. The primary outcome was the product appropriateness defined as the use of a pad with maximum absorbent capacity (MAC) from 30% to 50% higher than the individually measured urine load. Pads provision was corrected accordingly. Meaningful factors affecting products appropriateness and patient's satisfaction with the new products were also assessed.
The study included 14 493 subjects (mean age 78 years; 26% males, 74% females) using overall during the study days 98 362 pads. Sixty percent of the products were found to be not appropriate. In most of cases, (75%) products were inappropriate because too large. Age and pad weight gain, followed by gender, body weight, waist circumference, level of autonomy and mobility, pad wearing time, skin health status, and health district were independently associated to the propensity to inappropriateness. After correction of products prescription, a significant reduction (-31%) of the use of largest products was observed. At 6 months evaluation, 88% of evaluable participants were satisfied with the new prescription.
Most of patients are provided with not appropriate containment products. The use of the 48-h pad test allows improving on an individual basis the appropriateness of products provision.
客观评估并提高为采用包容策略管理的尿失禁(UI)患者提供失禁用品的适宜性。
2012年1月至2016年3月,来自意大利五个失禁护理服务机构的失禁患者被纳入这项由行业资助的研究。所有患者/护理人员均受邀进行为期48小时的居家尿垫测试并填写日记。主要结局是产品适宜性,定义为使用吸收能力最大值(MAC)比个体测量的尿量高30%至50%的尿垫。相应地对尿垫供应进行了调整。还评估了影响产品适宜性和患者对新产品满意度的重要因素。
该研究纳入了14493名受试者(平均年龄78岁;男性26%,女性74%),在研究期间共使用了98362片尿垫。发现60%的产品不合适。在大多数情况下(75%),产品不合适是因为尺寸过大。年龄、尿垫重量增加,其次是性别、体重、腰围、自主和活动能力水平、尿垫佩戴时间、皮肤健康状况以及健康区域与不合适倾向独立相关。在调整产品处方后,观察到最大尺寸产品的使用量显著减少(-31%)。在6个月的评估中,88%的可评估参与者对新处方感到满意。
大多数患者使用的包容产品不合适。采用48小时尿垫测试有助于根据个体情况提高产品供应的适宜性。