Suppr超能文献

大脑中非符号数字加工过程中累积的非数值证据:一项 fMRI 研究。

Accumulation of non-numerical evidence during nonsymbolic number processing in the brain: An fMRI study.

机构信息

The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Oct;38(10):4908-4921. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23703. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

Abstract

Behavioral evidence has shown that when performing a nonsymbolic number comparison task (e.g., deciding which of two dot arrays contains more dots), participants' responses are sensitive to affected by both numerical (e.g., number of items) and non-numerical magnitudes (i.e., area, density, etc.). Thus far it is unclear what brain circuits support this process of accumulating non-numerical variables during nonsymbolic number processing. To investigate this, 21 adult participants were asked to engage in a dot comparison task. To measure the neural correlates of accumulating numerical and non-numerical variables, we manipulated the number of the non-numerical magnitudes that were congruent (correlated with number) or incongruent (anticorrelated with number). In a control task, participants were asked to choose the darker of two gray rectangles (brightness task). The tasks were matched in terms of their difficulty. The results of a whole brain analysis for regions sensitive to the congruity of numerical and non-numerical magnitudes revealed a region in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). Activation in this region was found to be correlated with the relative congruency of numerical and non-numerical magnitudes. In contrast, this region was not modulated by difficulty of the brightness control task. Accordingly in view of these findings, we suggest that the rIFG supports the accumulation of non-numerical magnitudes that are positively correlated with number. Therefore taken together, this study reveals a brain region whose pattern of activity is influenced by the congruency between numerical and non-numerical variables during nonsymbolic number judgments. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4908-4921, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

行为证据表明,当执行非符号数字比较任务(例如,判断两个点数组中包含的点更多)时,参与者的反应会受到数值(例如,项目数量)和非数值大小(即,面积、密度等)的影响。到目前为止,尚不清楚哪些大脑回路支持在非符号数字处理过程中积累非数值变量的过程。为了研究这一点,21 名成年参与者被要求参与点比较任务。为了测量在积累数值和非数值变量时的神经相关性,我们操纵了与数量一致(与数量相关)或不一致(与数量相反)的非数值大小的数量。在控制任务中,参与者被要求选择两个灰色矩形中较暗的一个(亮度任务)。这些任务在难度上是匹配的。对敏感于数值和非数值大小一致性的大脑区域进行全脑分析的结果显示,右侧下额叶回(rIFG)中存在一个区域。该区域的激活与数值和非数值大小的相对一致性相关。相比之下,该区域不受亮度控制任务难度的调节。因此,鉴于这些发现,我们认为 rIFG 支持与数量呈正相关的非数值大小的积累。因此,综上所述,这项研究揭示了一个大脑区域,其活动模式受到非符号数字判断中数值和非数值变量之间一致性的影响。人脑映射 38:4908-4921,2017。©2017 威利期刊公司

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Predictions Shape Confidence in Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus.预测塑造对右下额叶回的信心。
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 5;36(40):10323-10336. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1092-16.2016.
5
Neural foundations and functional specificity of number representations.数字表征的神经基础与功能特异性
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar;83:257-273. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
9
Comparing performance in discrete and continuous comparison tasks.比较离散和连续比较任务中的表现。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 May;67(5):899-917. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.837940. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验