• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

"团队的一部分":为健康研究和规划中的新角色培训患者的结果映射。

"Part of the Team": Mapping the outcomes of training patients for new roles in health research and planning.

机构信息

Patient and Community Engagement Research (PaCER) Program, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1428-1436. doi: 10.1111/hex.12591. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12591
PMID:28660732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5689226/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A patient research internship (Patient and Community Engagement Research program-PaCER) was created to support a provincial commitment by Alberta Health Services' Strategic Clinical Networks to find new ways to engage patients in a new interdisciplinary organization to support evidence-informed improvements in clinical outcomes across the health system.

OBJECTIVE

Implement and test a new research method and training curriculum to build patient capacity for engagement in health through peer-to-peer research.

DESIGN

Programme evaluation using Outcome Mapping and the grounded theory method.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one patients with various chronic conditions completed one year of training in adapted qualitative research methods, including an internship where they designed and conducted five peer-to-peer inquiries into a range of health experiences.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were continually monitored and evaluated using an Outcome Mapping framework, in combination with grounded theory analysis, based on data from focus groups, observation, documentation review and semi-structured interviews (21 patient researchers, 15 professional collaborators).

RESULTS

Key stakeholders indicated the increased capacity of patients to engage in health-care research and planning, and the introduction and acceptance of new, collaborative roles for patients in health research. The uptake of new patient roles in health-care planning began to impact attitudes and practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient researchers become "part of the team" through cultural and relationship changes that occur in two convergent directions: (i) building the capacity of patients to engage confidently in a dialogue with clinicians and decision makers, and (ii) increasing the readiness for patient engagement uptake within targeted organizations.

摘要

背景

为了支持艾伯塔省卫生服务战略临床网络的一项省级承诺,即寻找新方法让患者参与一个新的跨学科组织,以支持整个卫生系统中基于证据的临床结果改善,创建了一个患者研究实习计划(患者和社区参与研究计划-PaCER)。

目的

实施和测试一种新的研究方法和培训课程,通过同行研究来增强患者参与健康的能力。

设计

使用成果映射和扎根理论方法进行方案评估。

设置和参与者

21 名患有各种慢性疾病的患者完成了为期一年的适应性定性研究方法培训,包括实习,他们在实习中设计并进行了五项针对各种健康体验的同行调查。

主要结果测量

使用成果映射框架,结合扎根理论分析,根据焦点小组、观察、文件审查和半结构化访谈(21 名患者研究人员,15 名专业合作者)的数据,持续监测和评估结果。

结果

主要利益攸关方表示,患者参与医疗保健研究和规划的能力有所提高,以及在医疗研究中为患者引入和接受新的、协作角色。新的患者角色在医疗保健规划中的采用开始影响态度和实践。

结论

患者研究人员通过文化和关系的变化成为“团队的一部分”,这些变化朝着两个方向同时发生:(i)增强患者与临床医生和决策者进行自信对话的能力,以及(ii)增加目标组织内接受患者参与的准备程度。

相似文献

1
"Part of the Team": Mapping the outcomes of training patients for new roles in health research and planning."团队的一部分":为健康研究和规划中的新角色培训患者的结果映射。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1428-1436. doi: 10.1111/hex.12591. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
3
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Development, implementation and evaluation of a clinical research engagement and leadership capacity building program in a large Australian health care service.澳大利亚一家大型医疗服务机构中临床研究参与和领导力能力建设项目的开发、实施与评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 14;16:13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0525-4.
7
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
8
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.面向患者、医疗保健提供者、决策者和研究人员的健康患者导向研究能力(PORCH):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0762-1.
9
10
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.

引用本文的文献

1
Seeing the Invisible Resiliency (STIR): Chronic Autoimmune Conditions and Post-Secondary Education Experiences in Young Adulthood.洞察无形的复原力(STIR):青年期的慢性自身免疫性疾病与高等教育经历
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70332. doi: 10.1111/hex.70332.
2
Attitudes and perceptions regarding knowledge translation and community engagement in medical research: the PERSPECT qualitative study.关于医学研究中知识转化与社区参与的态度和认知:PERSPECT定性研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 3;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01306-y.
3
Key ingredients for successful collaboration in health research: perspectives of patient research partners.健康研究中成功合作的关键要素:患者研究伙伴的观点
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 5;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00590-2.
4
Ten health policy challenges for the next 10 years.未来十年的十大卫生政策挑战。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad010. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad010. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement in Health Research: An Exploratory Study Using Multiple Survey Tools.衡量患者参与健康研究的影响:一项使用多种调查工具的探索性研究。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 2;7(2):177-187. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad045. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Studying How Patient Engagement Influences Research: A Mixed Methods Study.研究患者参与如何影响研究:一项混合方法研究。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):379-395. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00685-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Exploring the outcomes of research engagement using the observation method in an online setting.探索在在线环境中使用观察法进行研究参与的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 21;13(11):e073953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073953.
8
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
9
The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient-oriented kidney health research network: Perspectives of researchers and patient partners.加拿大以患者为导向的肾脏健康研究网络中患者参与的动态性质:研究人员和患者伙伴的观点。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):905-918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13716. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
10
What are the reasons for unfinished nursing care as perceived by hospitalized patients? Findings from a qualitative study.住院患者认为未完成护理的原因是什么?一项定性研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):256-267. doi: 10.1111/hex.13652. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research.构建研究中的新角色与关系:患者参与研究的模式
Qual Life Res. 2015 May;24(5):1057-67. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0845-y. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
2
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.患者和家属参与:理解要素、制定干预措施和政策的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
3
Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.告知、教育患者并让患者参与其中的策略的有效性。
BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80.
4
From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning.从言辞到现实:让患者声音融入癌症支持性护理规划
Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):195-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00334.x.
5
Mapping health in the Great Lakes areas of concern: a user-friendly tool for policy and decision makers.绘制五大湖关注地区的健康状况:为政策制定者和决策者提供的便捷工具。
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Dec;109 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):817-26. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s6817.
6
Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?慢性病管理:改善慢性病护理需要付出什么?
Eff Clin Pract. 1998 Aug-Sep;1(1):2-4.
7
Consumer health informatics.消费者健康信息学
Healthc Forum J. 1995 Jan-Feb;38(1):28-33.