Department of Oncology,McMaster University,Ontario,Hamilton,Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences,McMaster University,Ontario,Hamilton,Canada.
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Aug;16(4):421-431. doi: 10.1017/S147895151700058X. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
Despite the increasing prominence of residential hospices as a place of death and that, in many regards, this specialized care represents a gold standard, little is known about the care experience in this setting. Using qualitative survey data, we examined the positive and negative perceptions of care in hospices and in other prior settings.
Qualitative comments were extracted from the CaregiverVoice survey completed by bereaved caregivers of decedents who had died in 16 residential hospices in Ontario, Canada. On this survey, caregivers reported what was good and bad about the services provided during the last three months of life as separate open-text questions. A constant-comparison method was employed to derive themes from the responses.
A total of 550 caregivers completed the survey, 94% (517) of whom commented on either something good (84%) and/or bad (49%) about the care experience. In addition to residential hospice, the majority of patients represented also received palliative care in the home (69%) or hospital (59%). Overall, most positive statements were about care in hospice (71%), whereas the negative statements tended to refer to other settings (81%). The hospice experience was found to exemplify care that was compassionate and holistic, in a comforting environment, offered by providers who were personable, dedicated, and informative. These humanistic qualities of care and the extent of support were generally seen to be lacking from the other settings.
Our examination of the good and bad aspects of palliative care received is unique in qualitatively exploring palliative care experiences across multiple settings, and specifically that in hospices. Investigation of these perspectives affirmed the elements of care that dying patients and their family caregivers most value and that the hospices were largely effective at addressing. These findings highlight the need for reinforcing these qualities in other end-of-life settings to create comforting and supportive environments.
尽管临终安养院作为死亡场所的地位日益凸显,而且在许多方面,这种专业护理代表了一个黄金标准,但人们对这种环境中的护理体验知之甚少。本研究使用定性调查数据,考察了临终安养院和其他先前环境中的护理的积极和消极方面。
从加拿大安大略省 16 家临终安养院的死者护理人员完成的 CaregiverVoice 调查中提取定性意见。在这项调查中,护理人员分别在单独的开放式问题中报告了在死者生命的最后三个月中所接受的服务的优缺点。采用恒定比较法从答复中得出主题。
共有 550 名护理人员完成了调查,其中 94%(517 人)对护理体验的好坏(84%)发表了评论。除了临终安养院,大多数患者还在家庭(69%)或医院(59%)接受姑息治疗。总体而言,大多数积极的评价都是关于临终安养院的护理(71%),而消极的评价则倾向于指向其他环境(81%)。临终安养院的护理经验被认为是充满同情心和整体性的,在舒适的环境中,由有人情味、专注和提供信息的提供者提供。这些护理的人文品质以及支持的程度普遍被认为在其他环境中缺乏。
我们对姑息治疗所接受的好坏方面的考察在定性上是独一无二的,它在多个环境中探索姑息治疗体验,特别是在临终安养院。对这些观点的调查肯定了临终患者及其家属护理人员最看重的护理要素,而且临终安养院在很大程度上有效地解决了这些要素。这些发现强调了在其他临终环境中加强这些品质的必要性,以创造舒适和支持性的环境。