• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

矽肺病相关意大利语网站的信度与可读性分析:对职业健康的启示

A reliability and readability analysis of silicosis-related Italian websites: implications for occupational health.

作者信息

Dini Guglielmo, Bragazzi Nicola Luigi, D'Amico Beatrice, Montecucco Alfredo, Igwe Stanley C, Brigo Francesco, Toletone Alessandra, Durando Paolo

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Postgraduate School in Occupational Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Med Lav. 2017 Jun 28;108(3):167-173. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i3.6083.

DOI:10.23749/mdl.v108i3.6083
PMID:28660869
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Silicosis represents a "classical" occupational disease characterized by a renewed interest. New risk factors are emerging, such as sandblasting in the jeans industry or hydrofracking, leading to clusters of acute or massive cases.

OBJECTIVES

Given that the Internet could represent a worker education and empowerment tool, and considering the increase in popularity of silicosis-related information, we aimed at systematically analyzing the reliability and readability of online silicosis-relevant information.

METHODS

The search term "silicosi" was used to query 5 top search engines. The first 3 pages of results were screened using two validated readability tools: namely, the Gulpease and the ReadIt DyLanLab grade level scores.

RESULTS

Seventy sites were analyzed. The Gulpease score differed among the types of websites: academic websites differed from institutional websites, as well as encyclopedia/dictionary pages from institutional sites. The Lexical Model - ReadIt DyLanLab grade level differed among the types of websites. Encyclopedia/dictionary pages differed from academic, commercial, health-related, institutional and news sites. Approximately, half of the websites were intended/designed for workers. Only the Global Model - Read-It DyLanLab grade level differed according to the intended/designed target. Only 1.4% of websites adhered to Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may have important practical implications for occupational physicians and health agencies/authorities. They should make efforts in strengthening their online presence, and producing appropriate material. This could lead to positive outcomes in term of occupational health promotion, potentially enabling workers to increase and to improve their work-related health and its determinants.

摘要

背景

矽肺病是一种具有新关注度的“典型”职业病。新的风险因素不断出现,如牛仔裤行业的喷砂作业或水力压裂,导致急性或大量病例的聚集。

目的

鉴于互联网可以成为工人教育和赋权的工具,并且考虑到与矽肺病相关信息的关注度不断提高,我们旨在系统分析在线矽肺病相关信息的可靠性和可读性。

方法

使用搜索词“silicosi”查询5个顶级搜索引擎。使用两种经过验证的可读性工具筛选结果的前3页:即Gulpease和ReadIt DyLanLab年级水平得分。

结果

分析了70个网站。Gulpease得分在网站类型之间存在差异:学术网站与机构网站不同,百科全书/词典页面与机构网站也不同。词汇模型 - ReadIt DyLanLab年级水平在网站类型之间存在差异。百科全书/词典页面与学术、商业、健康相关、机构和新闻网站不同。大约一半的网站是为工人设计的。只有全球模型 - Read-It DyLanLab年级水平根据预期/设计的目标而有所不同。只有1.4%的网站遵守了网络健康基金会行为准则。

结论

我们的研究结果可能对职业医生和卫生机构/当局具有重要的实际意义。他们应努力加强在线形象,并制作合适的材料。这可能会在职业健康促进方面产生积极成果,有可能使工人增强并改善与工作相关的健康及其决定因素。

相似文献

1
A reliability and readability analysis of silicosis-related Italian websites: implications for occupational health.矽肺病相关意大利语网站的信度与可读性分析:对职业健康的启示
Med Lav. 2017 Jun 28;108(3):167-173. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i3.6083.
2
Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections.评估玻璃体腔内注射的在线网站的可靠性、问责制、可读性、可及性和翻译质量。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Dec;4(12):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
3
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
4
Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.在线健康信息的可读性:对健康素养的影响。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2011 Dec;36(4):173-89. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2010.542529. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
5
Your patient information website: how good is it?你的患者信息网站:质量如何?
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):e90-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02792.x.
6
Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.互联网上以患者为导向的甲氨蝶呤信息网站:完整性、准确性、格式、可靠性、可信度和可读性综述
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):41-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080430.
7
Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.脊柱相关患者教育资料的易读性:来自专业组织和脊柱医生网站的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c.
8
Readability of online material related to skin cancer.在线皮肤癌相关资料的可读性。
Public Health. 2018 Oct;163:137-140. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
9
Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.包含牙种植体信息的网站的可读性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Dec;25(12):1319-24. doi: 10.1111/clr.12285. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.在线气管造口护理资源的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):272-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599814560338. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children.意大利关于儿童扁桃体切除术适应症家长指导网站的质量。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;25(3):e446-e452. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716569. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
A reliability and content analysis of Italian language anorexia nervosa-related websites.意大利语神经性厌食症相关网站的信效度与内容分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Aug 1;12:145-151. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S193088. eCollection 2019.
3
Big Data in occupational medicine: the convergence of -omics sciences, participatory research and e-health.
职业医学中的大数据:组学科学、参与式研究与电子健康的融合
Med Lav. 2019 Apr 19;110(2):102-114. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i2.7765.
4
Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.维基百科上自身免疫性疾病页面的可读性:系统定量评估
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 18;19(7):e260. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8225.