McNett Molly, Moran Cristina, Janki Clare, Gianakis Anastasia
J Neurosci Nurs. 2017 Aug;49(4):229-234. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000290.
Automated pupillometry is emerging as a mainstay in neurocritical care primarily because it overcomes limitations of manual pupillary examinations. Although several recent studies show improved assessment accuracy with a pupillometer, few investigate clinical use, specifically how well parameters correlate with multimodality monitoring and outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to examine correlations between serial pupillometer readings and intracranial pressure (ICP) values among neurocritically ill patients.
Prospective cohort, repeated measures.
The study sample was composed of adult patients with neurological injury who were admitted to intensive care unit, requiring hourly neurological assessment and pupillary checks within a level I trauma, urban, academic medical center.
Hourly pupillometer readings and corresponding ICP values were consecutively recorded for 72 hours after intensive care unit admission.
Serial assessments resulted in more than 2100 pupillometer readings from 76 subjects. Mean age of the study sample was 55.4 years, with a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8.9. The mean pupillometer values for the enrolled subjects included left constriction velocity of 1.22, left neurological pupil index of 4.21, left pupil size of 2.69, right constriction velocity of 1.18, right neurological pupil index of 4.18, and right pupil size of 2.57. The mean ICP of the study sample was 12, with mean cerebral perfusion pressure of 77. Pupillometer values significantly correlated with ICP values in bivariate (P < .001, r = 0.13-0.23) and multivariate regression models (F(6) = 17.63, P < .001).
Automated pupillometry in neurocritical care is a valuable adjunct to traditional invasive monitoring. Integration of routine pupillometer assessments not only improves accuracy of examinations but also correlates with ICP values.
自动瞳孔测量法正在成为神经重症监护中的一项主要手段,主要是因为它克服了手动瞳孔检查的局限性。尽管最近的几项研究表明使用瞳孔测量仪可提高评估准确性,但很少有研究调查其临床应用,特别是参数与多模态监测及预后的相关性如何。本研究的主要目的是检查神经重症患者连续瞳孔测量仪读数与颅内压(ICP)值之间的相关性。
前瞻性队列研究,重复测量。
研究样本由入住重症监护病房的成年神经损伤患者组成,这些患者在一级创伤、城市学术医疗中心需要每小时进行一次神经评估和瞳孔检查。
在重症监护病房入院后连续72小时每小时记录一次瞳孔测量仪读数和相应的ICP值。
连续评估产生了来自76名受试者的2100多次瞳孔测量仪读数。研究样本的平均年龄为55.4岁,格拉斯哥昏迷量表平均评分为8.9。纳入受试者的平均瞳孔测量仪值包括左侧收缩速度为1.22,左侧神经瞳孔指数为4.21,左侧瞳孔大小为2.69,右侧收缩速度为1.18,右侧神经瞳孔指数为4.18,右侧瞳孔大小为2.57。研究样本的平均ICP为12,平均脑灌注压为77。在双变量(P <.001,r = 0.13 - 0.23)和多变量回归模型(F(6) = 17.63,P <.001)中,瞳孔测量仪值与ICP值显著相关。
神经重症监护中的自动瞳孔测量法是传统侵入性监测的一项有价值的辅助手段。常规瞳孔测量仪评估的整合不仅提高了检查的准确性,而且与ICP值相关。