• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
People learn other people's preferences through inverse decision-making.人们通过反向决策来了解他人的偏好。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:46-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
2
Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone.人类仅凭决策速度就能推断出社会偏好。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun 20;22(6):e3002686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002686. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.关于他人选择推理的决策网络解释
Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:12-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 23.
4
A rational model of people's inferences about others' preferences based on response times.基于反应时间的人们关于他人偏好推断的理性模型。
Cognition. 2021 Dec;217:104885. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104885. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
Learning the Structure of Social Influence.学习社会影响的结构。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41 Suppl 3:545-575. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12480. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
6
The child as econometrician: a rational model of preference understanding in children.作为计量经济学家的儿童:儿童偏好理解的理性模型
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092160. eCollection 2014.
7
Sensitivity to the Sampling Process Emerges From the Principle of Efficiency.对抽样过程的敏感性源于效率原则。
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 1:270-286. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12596. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
Is social decision making for close others consistent across domains and within individuals?个体在不同领域和情境下对亲密他人的社会决策是否一致?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Aug;149(8):1509-1526. doi: 10.1037/xge0000719. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
9
Learning What to Want: Context-Sensitive Preference Learning.学习想要什么:上下文敏感偏好学习
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0141129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141129. eCollection 2015.
10
Decision-makers are resilient in the face of social exclusion.决策者在面对社会排斥时具有韧性。
Br J Psychol. 2018 Aug;109(3):604-630. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12294. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rational Framework for Group-Based Selective Social Learning.基于群体的选择性社会学习的理性框架。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 May 9;9:677-708. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00205. eCollection 2025.
2
Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.人类在奖励存在个体差异的情况下,仍能灵活地整合社会信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2404928121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404928121. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone.人类仅凭决策速度就能推断出社会偏好。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun 20;22(6):e3002686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002686. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The Emerging Science of Interacting Minds.互动心智的新兴科学。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):355-373. doi: 10.1177/17456916231200177. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
5
From brain to worksite: the role of fNIRS in cognitive studies and worker safety.从大脑到工作场所:近红外光谱在认知研究和工人安全中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 25;11:1256895. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256895. eCollection 2023.
6
Active Iterative Social Inference in Multi-Trial Signaling Games.多轮信号博弈中的主动迭代社会推理
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Apr 5;7:111-129. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00074. eCollection 2023.
7
Emotion prediction as computation over a generative theory of mind.情绪预测作为一种生成心智理论的计算。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Jul 24;381(2251):20220047. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0047. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
8
Quantitative mental state attributions in language understanding.语言理解中的定量心理状态归因
Sci Adv. 2021 Nov 19;7(47):eabj0970. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0970. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
9
The computational challenge of social learning.社会学习的计算挑战。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Dec;25(12):1045-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
Machine Teaching for Human Inverse Reinforcement Learning.用于人类逆强化学习的机器教学
Front Robot AI. 2021 Jun 30;8:693050. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.693050. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Infants' Understanding of Preferences When Agents Make Inconsistent Choices.当主体做出不一致选择时婴儿对偏好的理解
Infancy. 2017 Nov;22(6):843-856. doi: 10.1111/infa.12194. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology.朴素效用演算:常识心理学的基础计算原则。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):589-604. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
3
Cue Integration: A Common Framework for Social Cognition and Physical Perception.线索整合:社会认知与物理知觉的通用框架。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):296-312. doi: 10.1177/1745691613475454.
4
Affective cognition: Exploring lay theories of emotion.情感认知:探索外行的情绪理论
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:141-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
5
A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.关于他人选择推理的决策网络解释
Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:12-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 23.
6
The child as econometrician: a rational model of preference understanding in children.作为计量经济学家的儿童:儿童偏好理解的理性模型
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092160. eCollection 2014.
7
Young children's use of statistical sampling evidence to infer the subjectivity of preferences.幼儿使用统计抽样证据来推断偏好的主观性。
Cognition. 2011 Sep;120(3):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
8
Young children use statistical sampling to infer the preferences of other people.幼儿会使用统计抽样来推断其他人的偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1134-40. doi: 10.1177/0956797610376652. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
9
Action understanding as inverse planning.作为反向规划的动作理解
Cognition. 2009 Dec;113(3):329-349. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
10
Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error.损失厌恶是一种情感预测错误。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):649-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01760.x.

人们通过反向决策来了解他人的偏好。

People learn other people's preferences through inverse decision-making.

机构信息

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, United States.

School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:46-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.017
PMID:28662485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5572562/
Abstract

People are capable of learning other people's preferences by observing the choices they make. We propose that this learning relies on inverse decision-making-inverting a decision-making model to infer the preferences that led to an observed choice. In Experiment 1, participants observed 47 choices made by others and ranked them by how strongly each choice suggested that the decision maker had a preference for a specific item. An inverse decision-making model generated predictions that were in accordance with participants' inferences. Experiment 2 replicated and extended a previous study by Newtson (1974) in which participants observed pairs of choices and made judgments about which choice provided stronger evidence for a preference. Inverse decision-making again predicted the results, including a result that previous accounts could not explain. Experiment 3 used the same method as Experiment 2 and found that participants did not expect decision makers to be perfect utility-maximizers.

摘要

人们可以通过观察他人的选择来学习他人的偏好。我们提出,这种学习依赖于反向决策——反转决策模型以推断导致观察到的选择的偏好。在实验 1 中,参与者观察了 47 次他人的选择,并根据每个选择对决策者对特定项目的偏好的强烈程度对其进行了排序。反向决策模型生成的预测与参与者的推断一致。实验 2 复制并扩展了 Newtson(1974)的先前研究,其中参与者观察了一对选择并对哪个选择提供了更强的偏好证据进行了判断。反向决策再次预测了结果,包括之前的解释无法解释的结果。实验 3 使用与实验 2 相同的方法,发现参与者并不期望决策者是完美的效用最大化者。