• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cancer and Race: What They Tell Us about the Emerging Focus of Health Equity.

作者信息

Wailoo Keith

机构信息

Princeton University.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Oct;42(5):789-801. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3940441. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-3940441
PMID:28663175
Abstract

This article examines the history of concepts and frames (such as "equity" or "disparities") and how these frames have guided public policies and explanations about differences in health across the population. Considering the emblematic case of cancer, which has stimulated long and heated debate over social, economic, and biological causes, the article argues that the vocabularies of health reform are both semantic and also deeply political-framing different reform agendas. The article describes the evolving US debate over the biological, social, or environmental origins of differential cancer mortality along lines of social difference and race, tracing important shifts and reversal over time. Through this analysis, the article explains how and why equity concerns have figured (sometimes implicitly, sometimes explicitly) in health reform discussions, often in tension with other frames. It examines how Americans have used these frameworks to justify different kinds of action and inaction, concluding with a discussion of how these frameworks of "disparities" and "equity" should be understood today in scientific, political, and policy discourse..

摘要

相似文献

1
Cancer and Race: What They Tell Us about the Emerging Focus of Health Equity.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Oct;42(5):789-801. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3940441. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
2
[Equity and health sector reform in Latin America: a necessary debate].[拉丁美洲的公平与卫生部门改革:一场必要的辩论]
Cad Saude Publica. 2002;18 Suppl:23-36. Epub 2003 Jan 21.
3
How does whole of government action address inequities in obesity? A case study from Australia.政府整体行动如何解决肥胖方面的不平等问题?来自澳大利亚的案例研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 14;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0913-6.
4
Policy Approaches to Advancing Health Equity.促进健康公平的政策方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;22 Suppl 1:S50-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000365.
5
Framing Health Equity: US Health Disparities in Comparative Perspective.构建健康公平:美国健康差异的比较视角
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Oct;42(5):803-839. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3940450. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
6
Scoping review: national monitoring frameworks for social determinants of health and health equity.范围审查:健康的社会决定因素和健康公平性的国家监测框架
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 5;9:28831. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.28831. eCollection 2016.
7
Examining Whether The Health-In-All-Policies Approach Promotes Health Equity.考察健康全融入政策方法是否促进健康公平。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Mar;37(3):364-370. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1292.
8
Relieving the tension between national health equity strategies and global health equity.缓解国家卫生公平策略与全球卫生公平之间的紧张关系。
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Aug;47(6):608-610. doi: 10.1177/1403494819860742.
9
Towards a global monitoring system for implementing the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health: developing a core set of indicators for government action on the social determinants of health to improve health equity.建立实施《关于社会决定因素的健康问题的里约政治宣言》全球监测系统:制定一套核心指标,供政府采取行动改善健康公平,应对社会决定因素对健康的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 5;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0836-7.
10
An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries.对四个欧洲国家体育活动政策中的公平性和平等性的评估。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 24;15(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0481-y.