Rosenbaum Sara, Schmucker Sara
George Washington University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Oct;42(5):771-788. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3940423. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
Enacted as part of the watershed Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI prohibits discrimination by federally assisted entities on the basis of race, color, or national origin. Indeed, the law is as broad as federal funding across the full range of programs and services that affect health. Over the years, governmental enforcement efforts have waxed and waned, and private litigants have confronted barriers to directly invoking its protections. But Title VI endures as the formal mechanism by which the nation rejects discrimination within federally funded programs and services. Enforcement efforts confront problems of proof, remedies whose effectiveness may be blunted by underlying residential segregation patterns, and a judiciary closed to legal challenges focusing on discriminatory impact rather than intentional discrimination. But Title VI enforcement has experienced a resurgence, with strategies that seek to use the law as a basic compliance tool across the range of federally assisted programs. This resurgence reflects an enduring commitment to more equitable outcomes in federally funded programs that bear directly on community health, and it stands as a testament to the vital importance of a legal framework designed to move the nation toward greater health equity.
作为具有分水岭意义的1964年《民权法案》的一部分,第六章禁止联邦援助实体基于种族、肤色或国籍进行歧视。事实上,该法律涵盖范围与影响健康的各类项目和服务中的联邦资金一样广泛。多年来,政府的执法力度有起有落,私人诉讼当事人在直接援引其保护措施时也面临障碍。但第六章仍然是国家拒绝在联邦资助的项目和服务中进行歧视的正式机制。执法工作面临证据问题、补救措施的有效性可能因潜在的居住隔离模式而减弱,以及司法机构对关注歧视性影响而非故意歧视的法律挑战持封闭态度等问题。但第六章的执法工作已经复兴,出现了一些策略,试图将该法律用作各类联邦援助项目的基本合规工具。这种复兴反映了人们对在直接影响社区健康的联邦资助项目中实现更公平结果的持久承诺,它证明了一个旨在推动国家实现更大健康公平的法律框架的至关重要性。