Suppr超能文献

一项 III 期研究,评估了在早期类风湿关节炎患者接受一年治疗后继续、逐渐减少和停用培塞利珠单抗的情况。

A Phase III Study Evaluating Continuation, Tapering, and Withdrawal of Certolizumab Pegol After One Year of Therapy in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;69(10):1937-1948. doi: 10.1002/art.40196. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had achieved sustained low disease activity (a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate of ≤3.2 at both week 40 and week 52) after 1 year of treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP) at a standard dose (200 mg every 2 weeks plus optimized methotrexate [MTX]), we evaluated whether continuation of CZP treatment at a standard dose or at a reduced frequency (200 mg every 4 weeks plus MTX) was superior to stopping CZP (placebo plus MTX) in maintaining low disease activity for 1 additional year.

METHODS

A total of 293 patients from period 1 of our study were re-randomized 2:3:2 in period 2 to CZP at a standard dose (n = 84), CZP at a reduced frequency (n = 127), or placebo plus MTX (CZP stopped) (n = 82). The primary end point was the percentage of patients who maintained low disease activity throughout weeks 52-104 without flares. We used a hierarchical testing scheme, comparing CZP at a standard dose with CZP stopped. If P < 0.05 was achieved, then CZP at a reduced frequency was compared with CZP stopped (nonresponder imputation).

RESULTS

The 293 patients from period 1 represented 36% fewer patients than projected, yielding a smaller number of patients eligible for period 2. Higher proportions of patients treated with the standard and reduced frequency regimens maintained low disease activity than those who had stopped CZP (48.8% and 53.2%, respectively, versus 39.2% [P = 0.112 and P = 0.041, respectively; nominal P value, first hierarchical test not significant]). Similar trends were observed for radiographic nonprogression (change from baseline of ≤0.5 in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score; 79.2% and 77.9% of patients, respectively, versus 70.3%) and normative physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index score of ≤0.5; 71.4% and 70.6% of patients, respectively, versus 57.0%). Safety profiles were similar between all groups, with no new safety signals identified for continuing CZP to week 104. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

The study failed to meet its primary end point. However, there were no clinically meaningful differences between the standard and reduced frequency doses of CZP plus MTX; both controlled RA more effectively than stopping CZP.

摘要

目的

在接受培塞丽珠(CZP)标准剂量(每 2 周 200mg 联合优化甲氨蝶呤[MTX])治疗 1 年后达到持续低疾病活动度(第 40 周和第 52 周红细胞沉降率<3.2 的疾病活动评分 28 关节[DAS28-ESR])的初治早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,我们评估了在另外 1 年中继续使用 CZP 标准剂量(每 2 周 200mg)或降低频率(每 4 周 200mg 联合 MTX)治疗与停止 CZP(安慰剂联合 MTX)相比,哪种方案在维持低疾病活动度方面更具优势。

方法

在本研究的第 1 阶段的 293 例患者中,293 例患者被重新随机分配至第 2 阶段,按 2:3:2 的比例分别接受 CZP 标准剂量(n=84)、降低频率剂量(n=127)或安慰剂联合 MTX(CZP 停药)(n=82)。主要终点为无疾病活动度恶化的患者比例(52-104 周)。我们采用了分层检验方案,比较了 CZP 标准剂量与 CZP 停药的差异。如果达到 P<0.05,则比较 CZP 降低频率与 CZP 停药的差异(非应答者推测值)。

结果

第 1 阶段的 293 例患者较预计人数减少了 36%,导致符合第 2 阶段标准的患者数量减少。与 CZP 停药相比,接受标准和降低频率方案治疗的患者维持低疾病活动度的比例更高(分别为 48.8%和 53.2%,而 CZP 停药组为 39.2%[P=0.112 和 P=0.041,分别;名义 P 值,第一次分层检验不显著])。在影像学无进展(改良 Sharp/van der Heijde 评分从基线的变化≤0.5;分别为 79.2%和 77.9%的患者,而 CZP 停药组为 70.3%)和规范身体功能(健康评估问卷残疾指数评分≤0.5;分别为 71.4%和 70.6%的患者,而 CZP 停药组为 57.0%)方面也观察到了相似的趋势。所有组之间的安全性特征相似,未发现继续使用培塞丽珠至第 104 周的新的安全性信号。无死亡报告。

结论

该研究未能达到其主要终点。然而,培塞丽珠标准剂量和降低频率剂量加 MTX 之间没有具有临床意义的差异;两者均比停止 CZP 更有效地控制 RA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa13/5656933/7e16999581d3/ART-69-1937-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验