The Centre for Health and Social Change (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place London, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Dept. of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(suppl_4):iv13-iv26. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw149.
Integration of services for patients with more than one diagnosed condition has intuitive appeal but it has been argued that the empirical evidence to support it is limited. We report the findings of a systematic review that sought to identify health system factors, extrinsic to the integration process, which either facilitated or hindered the integration of services for two common disorders, HIV and chronic non-communicable diseases. Findings were initially extracted and organized around a health system framework, followed by a thematic cross-cutting analysis and validation steps. Of the 150 articles included, 67% (n = 102) were from high-income countries. The articles explored integration with services for one or several chronic disorders, the most studied being alcohol or substance use disorders (47.7%), and mental health issues (29.5%). Four cross-cutting themes related to the health system were identified. The first and most common theme was the requirement for effective collaboration and coordination: formal and informal productive relationships throughout the system between providers and within teams, and between staff and patients. The second was the need for adequate and appropriately skilled and incentivized health workers-with the right expertise, training and operational support for the programme. The third was the need for supportive institutional structures and dedicated resources. The fourth was leadership in terms of political will, effective managerial oversight and organizational culture, indicating that actual implementation is as important as programme design. A fifth theme, outside the health system, but underpinning all aspects of the system operation, was that placing the patient at the centre of service delivery and responding holistically to their diverse needs. This was an important facilitator of integration. These findings confirm that integration processes in service delivery depend substantially for their success on characteristics of the health systems in which they are embedded.
服务整合对患有多种诊断疾病的患者具有直观吸引力,但有人认为,支持这种做法的经验证据有限。我们报告了一项系统评价的结果,该评价旨在确定除整合过程之外的卫生系统因素,这些因素可以促进或阻碍两种常见疾病(艾滋病毒和慢性非传染性疾病)的服务整合。最初是围绕卫生系统框架提取和组织发现结果,然后进行主题交叉分析和验证步骤。在纳入的 150 篇文章中,67%(n=102)来自高收入国家。这些文章探讨了整合一种或多种慢性疾病服务的问题,研究最多的是酒精或物质使用障碍(47.7%)和心理健康问题(29.5%)。确定了与卫生系统相关的四个交叉主题。第一个也是最常见的主题是有效协作和协调的要求:整个系统内提供者之间以及团队内、工作人员和患者之间的正式和非正式的有益关系。第二个是需要足够数量的、具备适当技能和激励的卫生工作者——具备该方案所需的正确专业知识、培训和业务支持。第三个是需要支持性的体制结构和专用资源。第四个是领导力,包括政治意愿、有效的管理监督和组织文化,这表明实际执行与方案设计同样重要。第五个主题虽然不在卫生系统内,但却是系统运作各个方面的基础,即把患者置于服务提供的中心位置,全面满足他们的多样化需求。这是促进整合的一个重要因素。这些发现证实,服务提供方面的整合过程在很大程度上取决于其所处的卫生系统的特点。