Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam and Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Musselburgh, UK.
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1083-1091. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx012.
Maternal death reviews (MDRs) are part of the drive to increase accountability for maternal deaths and reduce their occurrence by identifying barriers to effective, quality care. However, conducting MDRs well is difficult; staff commitment and establishing a blame free environment are key challenges. By examining the communication strategies used in MDRs this study sought to understand how MDR members implement policy imperatives (e.g. 'no blame, no name') and manage the inevitable sensitivities of discussing a client's death in a multidisciplinary team. We observed and recorded four MDRs in Nigerian teaching hospitals and used conversation and discourse analysis to identify patterns in verbal and non-verbal interactions. MDRs were conducted in a structured way and had multidisciplinary representation. We grouped discursive strategies observed into three overlapping clusters: 'doing' no-name no-blame; fostering participation; and managing personal accountability. Within these clusters, explicit reminders, gentle enquiries and instilling a sense of togetherness were used in doing no-name, no-blame. Strategies such as questioning and invoking protocol were only partially successful in fostering participation. Regarding managing accountability, forms of communication which limit personal responsibility ('pass the buck') and resist passing the buck were observed. Detailed, lengthy eye witness accounts of dramatic events appeared to reduce staff's personal accountability. We conclude that interactional processes affect the meaningfulness of MDRs. In-depth, critical analysis depends on resisting 'passing the buck' by practitioners and chairs especially, who are also key to fostering participation and extracting value from multidisciplinary representation. Our innovative methods provide detailed insights into MDRs as an interactional process, which can inform design of training aimed at enhancing MDR members' skills. However, given the multitude of systemic challenges we should also adjust our expectations of MDRs and the individual practitioners tasked to perform them in the name of enhancing accountability for maternal death reduction.
产妇死亡评审(MDR)是提高产妇死亡问责制和减少死亡发生率的措施之一,其通过确定有效、高质量护理的障碍来实现这一目标。然而,要做好 MDR 工作并不容易;工作人员的承诺和建立无责环境是关键挑战。通过研究 MDR 中使用的沟通策略,本研究旨在了解 MDR 成员如何实施政策要求(例如“无责、无名”),并管理在多学科团队中讨论客户死亡时不可避免的敏感性。我们观察并记录了尼日利亚教学医院的 4 次 MDR,并使用会话和话语分析来识别口头和非口头互动中的模式。MDR 以结构化的方式进行,具有多学科代表性。我们将观察到的话语策略分为三个重叠的集群:“不指名、不指责”;促进参与;和管理个人责任。在这些集群中,通过明确的提醒、温和的询问和灌输团结感来实现不指名、不指责。在促进参与方面,询问和援引协议等策略只是部分成功。关于管理责任,我们观察到了一些沟通形式,这些形式限制了个人责任(“推卸责任”)并抵制了推卸责任。详细、冗长的目击者对戏剧性事件的描述似乎减少了工作人员的个人责任。我们的结论是,互动过程会影响 MDR 的意义。深入、批判性的分析取决于从业者,尤其是主席,他们要抵制“推卸责任”,这也是促进参与和从多学科代表中获取价值的关键。我们的创新方法为 MDR 作为一个互动过程提供了详细的见解,这可以为旨在提高 MDR 成员技能的培训设计提供信息。然而,鉴于存在大量的系统挑战,我们还应该调整我们对 MDR 和负责执行 MDR 的个人从业者的期望,以提高减少产妇死亡的问责制。