Kinney Mary V, Ajayi Gbaike, de Graft-Johnson Joseph, Hill Kathleen, Khadka Neena, Om'Iniabohs Alyssa, Mukora-Mutseyekwa Fadzai, Tayebwa Edwin, Shittu Oladapo, Lipingu Chrisostom, Kerber Kate, Nyakina Juma Daimon, Ibekwe Perpetus Chudi, Sayinzoga Felix, Madzima Bernard, George Asha S, Thapa Kusum
Save the Children US, Washington, DC, United States of America.
University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0243722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243722. eCollection 2020.
Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) systems aim to understand and address key contributors to maternal and perinatal deaths to prevent future deaths. From 2016-2017, the US Agency for International Development's Maternal and Child Survival Program conducted an assessment of MPDSR implementation in Nigeria, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe.
A cross-sectional, mixed-methods research design was used to assess MPDSR implementation. The study included a desk review, policy mapping, semistructured interviews with 41 subnational stakeholders, observations, and interviews with key informants at 55 purposefully selected facilities. Using a standardised tool with progress markers defined for six stages of implementation, each facility was assigned a score from 0-30. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed from the 47 facilities with a score above 10 ('evidence of MPDSR practice').
The mean calculated MPDSR implementation progress score across 47 facilities was 18.98 out of 30 (range: 11.75-27.38). The team observed variation across the national MPDSR guidelines and tools, and inconsistent implementation of MPDSR at subnational and facility levels. Nearly all facilities had a designated MPDSR coordinator, but varied in their availability and use of standardised forms and the frequency of mortality audit meetings. Few facilities (9%) had mechanisms in place to promote a no-blame environment. Some facilities (44%) could demonstrate evidence that a change occurred due to MPDSR. Factors enabling implementation included clear support from leadership, commitment from staff, and regular occurrence of meetings. Barriers included lack of health worker capacity, limited staff time, and limited staff motivation.
This study was the first to apply a standardised scoring methodology to assess subnational- and facility-level MPDSR implementation progress. Structures and processes for implementing MPDSR existed in all four countries. Many implementation gaps were identified that can inform priorities and future research for strengthening MPDSR in low-capacity settings.
孕产妇和围产期死亡监测与应对(MPDSR)系统旨在了解并解决导致孕产妇和围产期死亡的关键因素,以预防未来的死亡。2016年至2017年期间,美国国际开发署的孕产妇和儿童生存计划对尼日利亚、卢旺达、坦桑尼亚和津巴布韦的MPDSR实施情况进行了评估。
采用横断面混合方法研究设计来评估MPDSR的实施情况。该研究包括案头审查、政策梳理、对41名国家以下层面利益相关者的半结构化访谈、观察以及对55个经过特意挑选的机构中的关键信息提供者的访谈。使用一个为六个实施阶段定义了进展标志的标准化工具,每个机构被赋予0至30分的评分。对47个得分高于10分(“有MPDSR实践证据”)的机构的定量和定性数据进行了分析。
47个机构的MPDSR实施进展平均计算得分在30分中为18.98分(范围:11.75 - 27.38)。研究团队观察到国家层面的MPDSR指南和工具存在差异,且在国家以下层面和机构层面MPDSR的实施不一致。几乎所有机构都有指定的MPDSR协调员,但在标准化表格的可用性和使用以及死亡审核会议的频率方面各不相同。很少有机构(9%)建立了促进无过错环境的机制。一些机构(44%)能够证明因MPDSR而发生了变化。促成实施的因素包括领导层的明确支持、工作人员的承诺以及会议的定期召开。障碍包括卫生工作者能力不足、工作人员时间有限以及工作人员积极性不高。
本研究首次应用标准化评分方法来评估国家以下层面和机构层面的MPDSR实施进展。所有四个国家都存在实施MPDSR的结构和流程。发现了许多实施差距,可为在低能力环境中加强MPDSR的优先事项和未来研究提供参考。