• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用重新获取的乳腺钼靶图像进行局部乳腺密度评估。

Local breast density assessment using reacquired mammographic images.

作者信息

García Eloy, Diaz Oliver, Martí Robert, Diez Yago, Gubern-Mérida Albert, Sentís Melcior, Martí Joan, Oliver Arnau

机构信息

Computer Vision and Robotics Institute, University of Girona, Spain.

Tokuyama Laboratory GSIS, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2017 Aug;93:121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.033
PMID:28668405
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the spatial glandular volumetric tissue distribution as well as the density measures provided by Volpara™ using a dataset composed of repeated pairs of mammograms, where each pair was acquired in a short time frame and in a slightly changed position of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 99 pairs of repeatedly acquired full-field digital mammograms from 99 different patients. The commercial software Volpara™ Density Maps (Volpara Solutions, Wellington, New Zealand) is used to estimate both the global and the local glandular tissue distribution in each image. The global measures provided by Volpara™, such as breast volume, volume of glandular tissue, and volumetric breast density are compared between the two acquisitions. The evaluation of the local glandular information is performed using histogram similarity metrics, such as intersection and correlation, and local measures, such as statistics from the difference image and local gradient correlation measures.

RESULTS

Global measures showed a high correlation (breast volume R=0.99, volume of glandular tissue R=0.94, and volumetric breast density R=0.96) regardless the anode/filter material. Similarly, histogram intersection and correlation metric showed that, for each pair, the images share a high degree of information. Regarding the local distribution of glandular tissue, small changes in the angle of view do not yield significant differences in the glandular pattern, whilst changes in the breast thickness between both acquisition affect the spatial parenchymal distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that Volpara™ Density Maps is reliable in estimating the local glandular tissue distribution and can be used for its assessment and follow-up. Volpara™ Density Maps is robust to small variations of the acquisition angle and to the beam energy, although divergences arise due to different breast compression conditions.

摘要

目的

本文旨在使用由重复的乳房X线照片对组成的数据集,评估Volpara™提供的空间腺体体积组织分布以及密度测量值,其中每对照片在短时间内获取,且乳房位置略有变化。

材料与方法

我们对99名不同患者重复获取的99对全视野数字化乳房X线照片进行了回顾性分析。使用商业软件Volpara™密度图(Volpara Solutions,惠灵顿,新西兰)来估计每个图像中的全局和局部腺体组织分布。比较两次采集之间Volpara™提供的全局测量值,如乳房体积、腺体组织体积和体积乳房密度。使用直方图相似性指标(如交集和相关性)以及局部测量值(如差异图像的统计数据和局部梯度相关性测量值)对局部腺体信息进行评估。

结果

无论阳极/滤过材料如何,全局测量值均显示出高度相关性(乳房体积R = 0.99,腺体组织体积R = 0.94,体积乳房密度R = 0.96)。同样,直方图交集和相关性指标表明,对于每对图像,它们共享高度的信息。关于腺体组织的局部分布,视角的微小变化不会在腺体模式上产生显著差异,而两次采集之间乳房厚度的变化会影响实质的空间分布。

结论

本研究表明,Volpara™密度图在估计局部腺体组织分布方面是可靠的,可用于其评估和随访。Volpara™密度图对采集角度和束能量的微小变化具有鲁棒性,尽管由于不同的乳房压迫条件会出现差异。

相似文献

1
Local breast density assessment using reacquired mammographic images.使用重新获取的乳腺钼靶图像进行局部乳腺密度评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Aug;93:121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.评估 LIBRA 软件在乳腺癌风险预测中全自动乳腺密度评估的应用。
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):24-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192509. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.采用半自动和全自动方法及乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)评估乳腺癌风险和乳腺钼靶密度
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):348-355. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152062. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
4
Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.乳腺钼靶密度与乳腺磁共振成像估计的纤维腺体组织体积之间的相关性。
Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):933-42. doi: 10.1118/1.1668512.
5
A self-directed learning intervention for radiographers rating mammographic breast density.一项针对放射技师对乳腺钼靶图像乳腺密度进行评级的自主学习干预措施。
Radiography (Lond). 2017 Nov;23(4):337-342. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
6
Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.乳腺钼靶自动容积式乳房密度测量可能低估高密度乳房的乳房密度百分比。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Dec;24(12):1561-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach.乳腺体积密度测量:一种相对物理方法的敏感性分析
Br J Radiol. 2016 Oct;89(1066):20160258. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160258. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Multimodal Breast Parenchymal Patterns Correlation Using a Patient-Specific Biomechanical Model.多模态乳腺实质模式的相关性研究:基于患者特定的生物力学模型。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Mar;37(3):712-723. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2749685. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
9
Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.BI-RADS第五版时代的乳腺密度自动容积测量:与视觉评估的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 May;206(5):1056-62. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15472. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.处理后的数字乳腺钼靶图像与原始数字乳腺钼靶图像中的乳腺实质模式:一项针对评估不同图像表现形式下定量测量差异的大规模人群研究。
Med Phys. 2016 Nov;43(11):5862. doi: 10.1118/1.4963810.

引用本文的文献

1
A virtual imaging study of microcalcification detection performance in digital breast tomosynthesis: Patients versus 3D textured phantoms.数字乳腺断层合成中微钙化检测性能的虚拟成像研究:患者与三维纹理体模对比
Med Phys. 2025 Jun;52(6):3800-3814. doi: 10.1002/mp.17873. Epub 2025 May 8.
2
New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Imaging: The Rise of AI.乳腺癌成像的新前沿:人工智能的崛起
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 2;11(5):451. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050451.
3
Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging.
虚拟临床试验比较二维乳房 X 光摄影、数字乳腺断层合成和合成二维成像在癌症检测中的应用。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):806-814. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08197-x. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma.基于乳腺 CT 数据的乳腺摄影和断层合成术中的纤维腺体组织分布:基于患者的乳腺实质特征化。
Med Phys. 2021 Mar;48(3):1436-1447. doi: 10.1002/mp.14716. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer.自动容积式乳腺密度测量:乳腺癌患者与非乳腺癌患者双侧乳腺的差异变化。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Oct 28;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1198-9.
6
Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.自动化和临床乳腺成像报告和数据系统密度测量预测筛查和间期癌症的风险:病例对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 5;168(11):757-765. doi: 10.7326/M17-3008. Epub 2018 May 1.