Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Neurooncol. 2017 Oct;135(1):119-127. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2556-z. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that is seeing increasing use in neuro-oncology and offers an alternative to contrast-enhanced perfusion techniques for evaluation of tumor blood volume after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). To date, IVIM has not been validated against contrast enhanced techniques for brain metastases after SRS. In the present study, we measure blood volume for 20 brain metastases (15 patients) at baseline, 1 week and 1 month after SRS using IVIM and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI. Correlation between blood volume measurements made with IVIM and DCE-MRI show poor correlation at baseline, 1 week, and 1 month post SRS (r = 0.33, 0.14 and 0.30 respectively). At 1 week after treatment, no significant change in tumor blood volume was found using IVIM or DCE-MRI (p = 0.81 and 0.41 respectively). At 1 month, DCE-MRI showed a significant decrease in blood volume (p = 0.0002). IVIM, on the other hand, demonstrated the opposite effect and showed a significant increase in blood volume at 1 month (p = 0.03). The results of this study indicate that blood volume measured with IVIM and DCE-MRI are not equivalent. While this may relate to differences in the type of perfusion information each technique is providing, it could also reflect a limitation of tumor blood volume measurements made with IVIM after SRS. IVIM measurements of tumor blood volume in the month after SRS should therefore be interpreted with caution.
体素内不相干运动(IVIM)是一种磁共振成像(MRI)技术,在神经肿瘤学中应用越来越广泛,为立体定向放射外科(SRS)后评估肿瘤血容量提供了一种替代对比增强灌注技术的方法。迄今为止,IVIM 尚未针对 SRS 后脑转移瘤的对比增强技术进行验证。在本研究中,我们使用 IVIM 和动态对比增强(DCE)-MRI 测量了 15 例患者的 20 个脑转移瘤在 SRS 前后的基线、1 周和 1 个月的血容量。IVIM 和 DCE-MRI 测量的血容量之间的相关性在基线、1 周和 1 个月后 SRS 时显示出较差的相关性(r 分别为 0.33、0.14 和 0.30)。在治疗后 1 周,IVIM 或 DCE-MRI 均未发现肿瘤血容量的显著变化(分别为 p=0.81 和 0.41)。1 个月时,DCE-MRI 显示血容量显著降低(p=0.0002)。相比之下,IVIM 则表现出相反的效果,1 个月时血容量显著增加(p=0.03)。本研究结果表明,IVIM 和 DCE-MRI 测量的血容量并不相等。这可能与每种技术提供的灌注信息类型不同有关,但也可能反映了 SRS 后 IVIM 测量肿瘤血容量的局限性。因此,SRS 后 1 个月内 IVIM 测量的肿瘤血容量应谨慎解释。