Thothathiri Malathi, Evans Daniel G, Poudel Sonali
Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180580. eCollection 2017.
How do speakers choose between structural options for expressing a given meaning? Overall preference for some structures over others as well as prior statistical association between specific verbs and sentence structures ("verb bias") are known to broadly influence language use. However, the effects of prior statistical experience on the planning and execution of utterances and the mechanisms that facilitate structural choice for verbs with different biases have not been fully explored. In this study, we manipulated verb bias for English double-object (DO) and prepositional-object (PO) dative structures: some verbs appeared solely in the DO structure (DO-only), others solely in PO (PO-only) and yet others equally in both (Equi). Structural choices during subsequent free-choice sentence production revealed the expected dispreference for DO overall but critically also a reliable linear trend in DO production that was consistent with verb bias (DO-only > Equi > PO-only). Going beyond the general verb bias effect, three results suggested that Equi verbs, which were associated equally with the two structures, engendered verb-specific competition and required additional resources for choosing the dispreferred DO structure. First, DO production with Equi verbs but not the other verbs correlated with participants' inhibition ability. Second, utterance duration prior to the choice of a DO structure showed a quadratic trend (DO-only < Equi > PO-only) with the longest durations for Equi verbs. Third, eye movements consistent with reimagining the event also showed a quadratic trend (DO-only < Equi > PO-only) prior to choosing DO, suggesting that participants used such recall particularly for Equi verbs. Together, these analyses of structural choices, utterance durations, eye movements and individual differences in executive functions shed light on the effects of verb bias and verb-specific competition on sentence production and the role of different executive functions in choosing between sentence structures.
说话者如何在表达特定意义的结构选项之间进行选择?众所周知,总体上对某些结构的偏好超过其他结构,以及特定动词与句子结构之间先前的统计关联(“动词偏向”)会广泛影响语言使用。然而,先前的统计经验对话语规划和执行的影响,以及促进具有不同偏向的动词进行结构选择的机制尚未得到充分探索。在本研究中,我们操纵了英语双宾语(DO)和介词宾语(PO)与格结构的动词偏向:一些动词仅出现在DO结构中(仅DO),另一些仅出现在PO结构中(仅PO),还有一些在两种结构中出现的频率相同(同等)。随后自由选择句子生成过程中的结构选择揭示了总体上对DO的预期偏好,但关键的是,DO生成中也存在可靠的线性趋势,这与动词偏向一致(仅DO > 同等 > 仅PO)。除了一般的动词偏向效应外,三个结果表明,与两种结构同等相关的同等动词会引发特定动词的竞争,并且需要额外的资源来选择不太受欢迎的DO结构。首先,使用同等动词而非其他动词生成DO与参与者的抑制能力相关。其次,在选择DO结构之前的话语持续时间呈现二次趋势(仅DO < 同等 > 仅PO),同等动词的持续时间最长。第三,在选择DO之前,与重新想象事件一致的眼动也呈现二次趋势(仅DO < 同等 > 仅PO),这表明参与者特别针对同等动词使用了这种回忆。总之,这些对结构选择、话语持续时间、眼动以及执行功能个体差异的分析,揭示了动词偏向和特定动词竞争对句子生成的影响,以及不同执行功能在句子结构选择中的作用。