Matoori Simon, Thian Yeeliang, Koh Dow-Mu, Sohaib Aslam, Larkin James, Pickering Lisa, Gutzeit Andreas
Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom; Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 3, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland; Clinical Research Group, Hirslanden Clinic St. Anna, St. Anna-Strasse 32, 6006 Luzern, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
Transl Oncol. 2017 Aug;10(4):679-685. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
The first-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), sunitinib, exhibits an objective response rate of approximately 30%. Therapeutic alternatives such as other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, VEGF inhibitors, or mTOR inhibitors emphasize the clinical need to predict the patient's response to sunitinib therapy before treatment initiation. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of pretreatment portal venous phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) mean tumor density on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor growth in 63 sunitinib-treated mRCC patients. Higher pretreatment CECT tumor density was associated with longer PFS and OS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.968, P=.002, and HR=0.956, P=.001, respectively], and CECT density was inversely correlated with tumor growth (P=.010). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified two CECT density cut-off values (63.67 HU, sensitivity 0.704, specificity 0.694; and 68.67 HU, sensitivity 0.593, specificity 0.806) which yielded subpopulations with significantly different PFS and OS (P<.001). Pretreatment CECT is therefore a promising noninvasive strategy for response prediction in sunitinib-treated mRCC patients, identifying patients who will derive maximum therapeutic benefit.
转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的一线治疗药物舒尼替尼的客观缓解率约为30%。其他酪氨酸激酶抑制剂、VEGF抑制剂或mTOR抑制剂等治疗选择凸显了在开始治疗前预测患者对舒尼替尼治疗反应的临床需求。在本研究中,我们评估了63例接受舒尼替尼治疗的mRCC患者治疗前门静脉期对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)的平均肿瘤密度对总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和肿瘤生长的预后价值。治疗前CECT肿瘤密度较高与更长的PFS和OS相关[风险比(HR)分别为0.968,P = 0.002,以及HR = 0.956,P = 0.001],且CECT密度与肿瘤生长呈负相关(P = 0.010)。受试者工作特征分析确定了两个CECT密度临界值(63.67 HU,灵敏度0.704,特异性0.694;以及68.67 HU,灵敏度0.593,特异性0.806),这产生了PFS和OS有显著差异的亚组(P < 0.001)。因此,治疗前CECT是一种很有前景的非侵入性策略,可用于预测接受舒尼替尼治疗的mRCC患者的反应,识别将获得最大治疗益处的患者。